Beretta thread

File: 20170225_142125.jpg (844KB, 1400x1050px) Image search: [Google]

844KB, 1400x1050px

>>33156220
92s

Surplus m9 mag cut with an angle grinder for euro release.

File: Beretta6.jpg (206KB, 962x745px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 962x745px

Now D-spring equipped.

I don't know if I want to do more shit with it or get another handgun.

File: image.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

92A1 here. Hello friends

File: E3 Inox barrel.jpg (194KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 640x480px

>>33156220
My .40 90-Two with a 9mm Inox conversion barrel.

I posted this in a thread earlier and got no response but..

I'm looking into possibly buying an M9 just what the hell is the difference between these two?

https://www.botach.com/beretta-m9-9mm-pistols-w-3-magazines/


https://www.botach.com/beretta-92fs-police-special-9mm-pistols-w-3-magazines

>>33156220
I don't have pics of my Beretta's yet. But I would be interested in shooting the APX. Just one more modern polymer striker to leave the Glock in the dust.

>>33156800
been seriously contemplating one on consignment at my LGS. Ergos are damn near perfect. how goes it?

File: 1485846111741.jpg (102KB, 1089x1200px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1089x1200px

Anybody know anything about gunsmithing on the 92 platform?

Looking to get a match barrel and fit it myself, which area(s) on the barrel need to be fitted in order to center the muzzle end left/right?

>>33156960
Irrelevant. You will get whatever you buy from botach in literally 25 years because they ship fucking slow.

And I mean dead fucking slow. Avoid.

>>33156960
Well one is a 92FS and the other is an M9.

They are basically the same. Slight difference in the sights. The "Police Special" has, at different times, come with different sights. So read the description and see if they talk about the sights.

The police special also at different times was sold in a cardboard box and not a plastic one, since police stations don't use plastic storage boxes.

>>33156960
>M9
>92FS

M9's are built here in the US, where as the 92FS is made elsewhere.

>Both are almost $200 less than I paid for mine
I feel like a fucking failure now btw.

>>33157011
I've bought stuff from them before it's not that bad.
>>33157017
>>33157029
Thanks.

>>33156984
Yeah the ergos are great, it's super comfy. I like it a lot. It points nicely and is very soft shooting, very easy to keep on target. The trigger is nothing to write home about but it isn't terrible. If you can find one for a good price I highly recommend it.

>>33157029
92FS are also made in the US.

File: cRRO10E.jpg (165KB, 750x420px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 750x420px

>>33156984

Not him but I have a PX4 Compact Carry MOD 0, picked it up last week and shot 150 rounds through it a few days back, genuinely surprised as to how good the PX4 is.

Shit shoots flat as fuck, the sights Ameriglo makes for them are amazing and everything just feels quality.

I may buy a PX4 fullsize if I see a police trade in crop if they do crop up. Missed my chance on one for $300 a few months back.

>>33157096
how comfortable are you using 124 +p ammo for regular shooting?

not judging, just curious as to what you like to run through it.

>>33156721
upgrade the guide rod.

>>33157000
Dont, it's really not worth the effort. Aside from going full AMU M9, the only thing you're going to see that makes a lick of difference for mechanical accuracy on the 92 series is having a conical bushing fitted. A better trigger and sights may help YOU but a match barrel will mean fuck all to the gun.

>>33157158
Not that anon, but when I had mine it's mostly ate a steady diet of 124gr winchester ranger and nato spec contract overruns. Still have all my fingers and both eyes

>>33157316
Completely pointless aside from looking better. Going back to steel would be a functional downgrade

>>33156220
>As if anyone cares about it.
I do.
I want to shoot one.

>>33157139
Not sure how easy to convert but Arms Unlimited has some good prices on them plus free shipping. Buy 'em all

>>33157000
Fuck that, send it to Bill Springfield. Save money and get tuned how you want

>>33157029
I know that feel anon, I paid 600 and some change for my M9. I feel like a fucking fool now.

>>33157451
Maybe, if bill isn't losing his fucking mind that day.

>>33157691
Meh...~$600 is about the going rate for NIB 92 w/ 3 mags

Unless you but your shit used with wear on the finish and missing/defective magazines, $600 is not so bad.

File: IMG_20170216_125931.jpg (2MB, 2160x3840px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2160x3840px

>home defense

File: 22-kit-and-92.jpg (42KB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 650x650px

>>33156960
92 fs has a slight sloped dust cover. Get M9 for straight dust cover and it has no warning on the frame.

Also has anyone tried this?

File: WAEQ3.jpg (132KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 800x600px

shame we will never see compensator like this

>>33157139
I have a PX4 Full Size and enjoy it. Very easy to shoot. Feel like I could EDC it too.

File: m9a1.jpg (533KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

533KB, 1280x720px

Still one of my favorite weapons...

>>33157983
>plum grips
Anon my dick can only get so hard

File: 2016-12-31 22.17.44.jpg (389KB, 959x741px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 959x741px

Muh only beretta

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>33157895
Muh nigga

I was looking a product list for retailers from Beretta and the only INOX 92FS I saw available was the US made one. Is the INOX 92FS still made in Italy??

>>33156220
Is 400 dollars a good price for a beretta 85f?

>>33159119
What could is it in? What does it come with?

>>33158875
Koppelia no hitsugi...

>>33157911
yes. It is kinda good but i had trouble with the rear sights not going low enough, so i had to see a gun smith.
>yeye i know i could do it myself
but i would consider this instead
http://www.beretta.com/en-us/m9-22lr/

>>33159119
That's a steal for a Cheetah.

File: IMG_20170217_153007~3.jpg (2MB, 2808x1858px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2808x1858px

DeRosa was greatly concerned about someone else having his pistol

File: ARX100 1.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

Should I feel bad for putting the shittiest Tula I could possibly find through my ARX?

>>33160490
sexy

post more, slut

File: Fish Out Of Water 2.jpg (4MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4032x3024px

>>33161318
Here's another.

File: tanfoglio-gt-380-left-side.jpg (846KB, 1600x1115px) Image search: [Google]

846KB, 1600x1115px

hey guys can I play?

>>33158899
its full of 1000 rounds of tulammo

>>33162445
Unf. Work it, girl.

>>33162483
Only the best ;)

File: 1477759864617.gif (21KB, 455x364px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 455x364px

>>33162445
I actually like this..

>>33162496
That's the last time you'll ever see that side of the rifle in that pristine of a condition; HK sling hooks ruined it :^

>>33156984
>been seriously contemplating one on consignment at my LGS. Ergos are damn near perfect. how goes it?

Whittaker Guns has every PX4 including a $75 mail in rebate if you want in on a PX4. Prices on them are actually pretty low as it is not including the rebate

>>33156220
I want to get a Beretta tip-up barrel pistol. There's a bunch of versions and I'm not entirely sure which I should get.

File: beretta 86.jpg (54KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 640x480px

>>33162577
The Beretta 86 is in .380ACP so ammo would be more common and it can be used for defense.

>>33157000
>Anybody know anything about gunsmithing on the 92 platform?
I recently put a bunch of Wilson combat shit in my 92s so I'm practically as expert

>>33159598
It's a police trade in chambered in .380 acp. Comes with one magazine and that's it.

>>33163132
That thing is actually pretty sexy

>>33163565

...Are you the guy who had two punches and a drill bit stuck in his 92s?

>>33157332

Well the current barrel rubs on the slide so I'd say that's not doing wonders for accuracy

>>33157451

How is that cheaper than doing it myself?
I'm a machinist so I'd have no problems doing it myself, but I'm pretty unfamiliar with the platform and I can't find any online reading material on the subject

>>33157029
92FS is also made in the US.

>>33156784
Consider me jealous

>>33165881
To reply to both of your posts yeah skip tell Bill Springfield shit. If you're a machinist that opens up a lot more possibilities. If you want to keep the basic Beretta look sure, get a KKM or Barsto or a Jarvis barrel. If not, you can look into a weigand nose piece, wedged compensators or building your own Beretta Combat/Steel bushing or a WAL bushing

How much are you planning on tightening the gun up. Like just improving it or going full NM?

File: 1487397333597.jpg (147KB, 1200x932px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1200x932px

>>33167537

I'm thinking of doing a conical WAL-type bushing myself in the future, but probably on a different 92.

For this one I just want to swap the factory barrel out for a KKM barrel and see how that improves groups. Right now this gun is getting 6" groups at 25 yds even though it's near-new (had it basically gifted to me from a friend, barely shot safe queen).

I believe this is because the barrel rubs against the slide at the muzzle end. Barrel is crooked to the right from the factory.

I couldn't find anything dimensionally off with the slide locking cutouts or frame rails so I'm guessing it's the barrel.

But before I drop the cash on the KKM barrel I want to know how to fit it, especially centering the barrel left/right at the muzzle