Is there such a thing in the modern market? I sure haven't heard of it.
Other than the modern M1 Carbines of course.
>>33145140
Your best bet is hitting up the used racks at your lgs
Aside from .22lr and sometimes 22mag you're not gonna find a pistol caliber carbine with wood furniture made within the last decade.
Marlin camp carbine? Or ruger 10/22s.
>>33145206
Pretty much this. There really isn't a market.
>>33145188
Unless you count the Chiappa M1-9s but that might be what OP meant. I haven't heard good things about those anyway.
>>33145332
Op here. Used to work at afagemy. These were returned a shit load.
>>33145563
What was wrong with them? I used to want one until I saw how much they jammed, anything worse than that?
>>33145206
didnt ruger make something similar to the camp?
Pretty sure the Linda Carbine here is what you want. Sexy little fucker but the price tag is pretty steep.
>>33145140
Why not a levergun in 357 or 44 mag?
>>33145140
Here's what you do OP
>Buy used Hi-point carbine for $200
>Find a way to get wood furniture for it from the massive Hi point modding community
>Be amazed that you still spent less than the next available option
>be amazed that your 2nd hand modded gun still has a rock solid life time warranty
Seriously, buy a fucking Hi point.
>>33146260
Ruger made the 44 carbine years ago.
Kinda like a 10/22 beefed up to take 44 magnum.
An old fudd who shoots at my range has one. Nice handy gun and pretty accurate out to 150 yards or so.
>>33146816
>Kinda like a 10/22 beefed up to take 44 magnum.
Other way around. The 10/22 was a 44 rechambered in .22lr
>>33146849
>>33146816
dont forget the mini14 .44mag
>>33146295
Cousin has one of the older versions. It stopped working one day and the local gunsmith is retarded and didn't notice the broken firing pin. Glad they're making a comeback
>>33146816
Think he means the PC9
>>33146816
They made 2. The 10/44 in your pic and the Deerfield, which was super aesthetic.
>>33145332
I recently picked up a Chiappa M1-9 and it works pretty good. However, I stuck with my rule that I would let someone buy theirs and test it first, then buy a working one off of them. I'm pretty happy with it so far, I'll see how well it does in the future. I really like the sights.
Ultimately if anyone was to ask me seriously: "Should I buy a new one of these?" I'd say no. But picking up a used one that someone's already tested isn't the worst idea, especially in Canada where the PCC market tends to be pricey to buy into. In the US there's probably 10x better options.
>>33146169
Not him, but they also have plastic sights you can squeeze and bend and stuff. Sad, because that would have been a cool gun if it worked well.
>>33145140
Some company used to make M1 carbines in .357 and .44 magnum.