The weapon that won the 21st Century.

>>33124559
>The weapon that won the 21st Century.
Shitty CGI propaganda pictures?

>>33124559
The aircraft carrier? Yeah, they're pretty neat.

>>33124559
Nukes deffo changed war forever. Since their esablishment on a widespread level anyways.

>>33124559
>first you have t reduce AOU
>then you have to launch
>then bypass area defense
>then terminal sensors need to work
>then bypass point defense

Standards have shot down their equivalents. It's a good economic posturing weapon, but a shitty one for fighting a real war.

>>33124632
>nukes
>real
pick one, fucko

>>33124643
How can nukes be real if our eyes aren't real?

Checkmate atheists.

>>33124641
>you can only launch one missile at a time
This isn't some fragile multi-billion dollar American weapon.

>>33124641
Well, it's hard to say for certain what real effect a nuke would have on a battle where nukes are given the go-ahead. But nobody can deny their ability to shut-down invasions and the like

>>33124655
>AEGIS can now kill ballistics in exoatmosphere
>Trivial for CBGs to evade satellites for targeting
>Implying we won't erase those if you decide you want a war within a day

>>33125209
>>AEGIS can now kill ballistics in exoatmosphere
only if it's right above them. Mid-course intercept doesn't mean shit when the warhead is already diving towards you

>>33125751
>only if it's right above them. Mid-course intercept doesn't mean shit when the warhead is already diving towards you
F-35s can spot for SM-3s outside AEGIS's range, allowing for intercept well before that point.

SM-3 Block IIA is rated for intercept in space before it can release.

And again, you need to be able to acquire the target in the first place.

>>33125751
SM-3 has done irbm midcourse, sm-6 has done mrbm termimal

File: Great leap.png (129KB, 1660x238px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1660x238px

>>33124559

>>33124559
>chinks honestly belive this
an aircraft carrier can detect threats from 4 nautical miles
an aircraft carrier has defenses that can shoot down missiles
and the shitty chink missile will break up in flight anyways because chinks dont know what quality control is

File: 1488137600109.png (146KB, 642x554px)

146KB, 642x554px

>>33124559
>The weapon that won the 21st Century.
Yeah, I can see carriers going 2 for 2.

>>33124559
>implying nukes would ever get that close to a carrier
>implying it wouldnt have exploded in midair to maximize damage
>implying that nukes still matter

day/k/are at its finest
This is just below all the "USA lost the vietnam war" threads the cucks keep posting

/pol/ is seriously ruining this board

>>33129060
i can guarantee that any chink dick sucker is from /leftypol/

>>33124559

Thats not the fuzed AA-shell.

>>33129093
>i can guarantee that any chink dick sucker is Canadian

FTFY

File: the phone calls that saved the world.png (324KB, 500x387px)

324KB, 500x387px

>>33124559

>>33125751
>I don't know the difference between mid course and terminal interception.

>>33129060
>He thinks ASBMs have nuclear warheads
You must be 18 to post here.

File: DO NOT LEARN MANDARIN.png (946KB, 1400x5552px) Image search: [Google]

946KB, 1400x5552px

>>33128288
Holy shit, that's a hell of a burn.

As a reward, have the funniest explanation of small-medium business practices in China I've ever seen.

>>33128995
I don't understand the reference.

>>33130126
Saved for future reposts as needed.