.22 genenral

File: 88197435c83c18ef8e7a9616c404a4f6.jpg (256KB, 700x744px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 700x744px

>Best looking
I'd vote for the Ruger MKII Slabside

File: Ruger-22-45-Lite-Review-1.jpg (338KB, 1000x592px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 1000x592px

I really want this. Do I start the process of waiting for a suppressor? or wait for the HPA?

File: CMMG-AR-15-22-Convervsion-Kit-all-bolts.jpg (97KB, 700x464px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 700x464px

>>33093411
>What is the best .22

>>33093835
>Just a normal BCG with a 223 shaped bolt
I didn't think it'd be so easy...But now that I think about it it makes sense. Neat.

>>33093411
there's a couple old mk I and IIIs at the stores around here and i've been resisting the urge to snap one up. best plinker imo.

File: DSC06713.jpg (179KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 1600x1200px

>>33096022
sure mk1 and 2 are pretty good but the problem with them is that they are hard to disassemble to clean.
Mk.IV does not have that problem and I would rather spend money on mark.IV where the design is updated

The Mark IV being so easy to clean really makes it finally a true innovation over the Mark II.

I know people hate the mag disconnect, but it's not a defensive handgun, it's a target pistol. It wasn't worth it on the Mark III, but I think it's well worth it for the new ease of take down.

>>33093756
If you already gave up your prints then just do it. If not then buy the suppressor and just don't do the Form 4.
>>33094660
chamber insert, but yeah
I really want one for 5.45