I want to get me a suppressor. I am 100% aware that I will be

File: FI9V3M6F9T3ZZJP.MEDIUM.jpg (58KB, 620x412px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 620x412px

>>33084529
GOAT suppressor incomin

>>33084529
>I am 100% aware that I will be getting it for pure novelty
You're an idiot.

>>33084596
What useful application do 99% of suppressor owners have?

I am being serious.

>>33084621
Are you a cuck or a retard? How are hearing safety and noise pollution novelties?

Get the Wolverine.

>>33084621
>hunting
>hearing protection
>reduction in noise pollution (mother nature thanks you, and so do nearby people)
>reduced recoil

its not a novelty, they really do help.

>>33084674
>>33084709
>hearing protection

Do you people not use ear plugs? Or is this to help legitimize the HPA, if the second I 100% understand.

>>33084621
>>33084674
>>33084709

Suppressors are novelty. On most of them you should still fucking wear protection so it's not like they help in that area as much as good ear muffs. Don't get me wrong I love mine, but saying it has a practical use for people who aren't operating is a lie.

>>33084789
>>33084926
>cherry pick from the answers given
>still need to strawman
Nobody said other forms of hearing protection don't work too. That STILL doesn't make suppressors a novelty.

>but saying it has a practical use for people who aren't operating is a lie.
I think you need to look up the word 'practical.'

>>33084789
The quieter you can get your rifles the better, anything over 100db is liable to cause hearing damage over time.

>>33084529
Hybrid
>>33084789
Even double earpro is insufficient to prevent hearing loss, especially with larger calibers and short barrels.
>>33084926
You are a small picture fucking retard. A suppressor is simply the civilized thing to do.
Say you have a nice half dozen acres to shoot on. Your AK is going to be heard a quarter mile away, do you really need to disturb your neighbors?
A suppressor makes an indoor range much more palatable. It's safer for the shooters, it's safer for the employees, and it's nicer for the neighbors.

There is no legitimate argument against them. In fact, there's a pretty good arguement for requiring them.

>>33084709

>hunting
lmao as if you need another fucking advantage
>hearing protection
yeah, just wear some
>reduction in noise pollution
nigga really, noise pollution?
>reduced recoil
yeah, but you're also getting gas and particles blown back in your face

>>33084529
The Wolverine is a good can, but it is not a good first can and it's a shitty multipurpose can. Get either the Hybrid or the Mystic X.

>>33085092
>requiring them

That's just as bad as banning them you fucking statist

>>33085092
>there's a pretty good arguement for requiring them.

.02 silencerco credits have been deposited into your account. thanks for suppressing the record!

>>33085114
for use on government land, not for possession,
even for possession that's literally just not true.
>a private range saying suppressors required is statist
k

>>33085114
>That's just as bad as banning them you fucking statist
>SHALL
That's objectively false, but I see what you're saying. Hypothetically if I were a /k/uck, I would rather pay a fine/tax for NOT having one than for having one, plus the inflated price, plus registration, plus wait times, plus having to notify the ATF when you cross a state border, plus...

>>33085221
You do know that you don't need to notify the ATF for taking your silencer to different states, right?

>>33085111
Hybrid is also another shitty multipurpose can, probably even more so than the WOlverine because it is rifle/handgun and the Wolverine is rifle only.

Can you put the wolverine on pistols?

>>33084529
>Dead Air Wolverine (PBS-1 copy)
Thing is a piece of shit and only superficially looks like a PBS-1.

>>33085759
Yes, however it is better in every way for functionality

>>33085693
No you need pistons to do that

File: dead-air-armament-wolverine-psb-1-001.jpg (117KB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 2048x1360px

you know what to get

>>33086464
thats ugly

>>33084529
NO REAL POINT UNLESS SUBSONIC

/THREAD

>>33086945
Can you buy/make subsonic 7.62?

>>33084596
Thanks for the valuable input anon

>>33086991
It exists but it's expensive. I bet you could buy modern reloadable brass case 762 and reload it to be subsonic.

>>33086991
>>33087199
I will say this. My friend has a suppressor for his yugo AK. Standing 10 feet behind him it was very, very quiet. Even just using regular wolf or whatever. Shooter still needs earpro but it is much more comfortable to shoot with just plugs in. I always double up my earpro unless I'm shooting suppressed, then I just use plugs.

He also turned the gas off and fired it single shot.
Much quieter. The action of an AK is very loud

>>33086945
you can't "/thread" yourself, newfag