Am I the only one who thinks that the Ausf. L was a good tank?
>>33074673
You can think all you want but it doesn't change reality.
>>33074673
opinion=/=fact
>>33074673
It would be amazing '35-'40...
If it's turret ring had been large enough to mount the long 75 the PzIII would have undoubtedly been used late into the war over the PzIV
>>33078827
It essentially did as the stug 3
>>33074673
>no slanted armor
Yeah... no. Honestly if that was implemented, the tank would've improved plenty.
>>33078865
Bit strange how they never got around to it but I guess "we can't halt production" is a good enough reason as any.
>>33074673
>designed 35-37
It would have been good enough back then
>>33078865
Sloped armor wouldn't have fixed the limited turret ring size, or the steadily increasing weight, or the complexity of the design and the associated man-hours to build them.
It'd make it a bit less vulnerable, but there are more glaring issues than the frontal armor.