>buy glock >replace sights >replace springs >replace

>>33061260
This is something I have always found kind of funny. People replace every peace of a Glock until its a hollow shell of what came in that box from Austria. I don't see any issues with changing sights, but replacing all OEM parts with aftermarkets is retarded.

>>33061299
dubs confirm retardation. problem is, people need to replace OEM parts for them to work right, but glock apologists will deny.

>>33061299
Marketing 101. Damn they've got a good hustle going on.
>can't operate the most basic bitch of all the pistols
>despite the fact millions of others have no problems
>here, buy this shit so you change the machine instead of yourself
>turns out you're actually dogshit, but hey, thanks for your money

File: 20160723_183747_resized.jpg (1MB, 1725x969px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1725x969px

>>33061260
I'm not replacing anything other than getting night sights though. I like my Glock just how it is.

>>33061323
mine has night sights and extended controlls, i have around 3,000-4,000 rounds threw my g19.

oh and i installed a polished lightened trigger connector bar, big whoop.

ive had 3 failures, all FTE and it was due to shit ammo.

File: 1479347541388.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>>33061340
ayyyeee

>>33061439
>he points glocks at his arteries all day

>t. m&Pee owner
>t. Kahr
>t. Walther
>t. h&gay
>t. Croatian imports by Springfield

The list of asshurt faggots goes on ahahahahahahahah

>>33061518
you just named 3 (not inclusing springfield and s&w) manufacturers that do pistols better than glock

>>33061260
>Everyone that likes Glocks does one gorillion mods

Kill yourself. I don't even own a Glock, but I can tell you the people that hate on Glock fanbois are, at this point, worse than Glocksuckers.

>>33061260

How many times you going to make this retarded thread? I feel like that should be considered spamming, you should be ban. Either way, you're just a giant faggot.

Also, glock owner here, only thing I've change out is the sights, cause they got bent horribly. Plus who cares if some one buys a gun, does all that shit to it. It's not your gun, not your money, so why don't you just worry about yourself faggot.

>>33061504

How retarded are you?
Special ed by any chance?

CZ, now fuck off

>buy $540 gun
>spend $330 to make it not shit
>mock people for "overpaying" for a $750 USP
Glawk berfegshun.

>>33061260
>he's to autistic to understand marketing buzzwords
>actually believing that Glock fans believe in the 'perfection' meme

>buy best glock 19 gen 4
>first round fired stove pipes
>the next 400 or 500 rounds fire are flawless
>get home from range one day
>take glock out for cleaning but take down tabs are missing
>wut?
>turns out I lost the take down lever at the range somehow
>have to order new spring and take down
>CC Ruger LCP while waiting for parts to arrive

Thats about all the issues I had with Glock. I've owned many different models at one time or another but they all run fine (and kept their parts in the gun).

>>33061340
>poop colored
>like just how it is
do you live in certain asian country by any chance?

>>33061907
>I've never met a glock owner : the post

>>33061340
>>33061439
>perfection

>can't do FDE

and people trust their lives to this pile of shit gun

>>33061864
which one of us is retarded, you for pointing a striker fired plastic gun at your femoral artery every day, or me for pointing it out?

>>33062132
There is nothing unsafe about glock triggers if that's what you're implying.

>>33062148
>breaks cardinal rule of gun safety every day
>justifies it
It is no coincidence you have shit taste in guns, also.

>>33062148
>nothing unsafe about glock triggers

>cc gun has an aftermarket trigger on it

>>33062158
So by your definition carrying a gun is always unsafe
>>33062187
Mine is stock actually

>>33061260
Why is it that modularity is considered a good thing for every type of gun, but when it's applied to glock it's a bad thing? No one gets asshurt when someone buys a 6920 and then decides to change the handguard later down the road.

>>33061847
What I was thinking... OP sounds like a 400 pound liberal telling everyone else how to eat health.

>>33061260
what's BTF?

>>33061847
>t. Asshurt glawkfag with a niggergun

>bought a Glock.
>changed nothing
>spent all that money on ammo instead
>got gud

I love my G21.

>>33062247
Beat To Fuck, i would assume.

>>33062210
>so by your definition carrying a gun is unsafe
No. By definition, appendix carry is unsafe.

ITT: assmad glocktards must justify why they favor shitty handguns

>>33062228
no other company is marketed as "perfection"

no other company has the same kind of fudd nu-gun faggot following that repeats it unironically while simultaneously dumping hundreds of dollars of mods into their "perfect" guns to make them better

I actually wouldn't mind owning a glock but fuck if they went out of business or all their fanboys were gassed I would also be fine.

>>33062228
>can't see the difference between modularity and inferiority
and this is why you make bad choices

>>33062415
That seems like a pretty stupid reason to be assmad over Glock. You could at least mention the shitty grip angle or ergos, but you instead choose to get pissy at a marketing decision that was made long before its aftermarket evolved to what it is today. Does HK make you upset with their "No Compromise" line, despite all HK handguns having a lower standard magazine capacity than their competitors?

File: 1460651277022.png (14KB, 166x166px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 166x166px

I've yet to find another gun that gets hated as much as a Glock.

And for no reason other than the fact people hate it because of people that like it.

And at no fault of the gun.

Glock is the BMW of the gun world.

It all makes sense now.

But seriously, if you hate a gun because of other people you're probably autistic.

>>33062525

>Glock is the BMW of the gun world.

You're obviously a retarded anime-posting defective gook adolescent male who has never done any wrenching around cars.

The BMW is expensive and unreliable. The Glock is cheap and reliable. Leave.

>>33062525
>Glock is the BMW of the gun world.

That is the most idiotic thing I have heard all day.

>>33061260
Glocks are trash, as is sig and CZ. Avoid avoid avoid.

File: 1470778525127.jpg (84KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 400x400px

>>33062552
>>33062564

Oh jeez, he equated the thing I like to something I don't, must make it untrue.

Try reading comprehension instead of the one part of the post you disagree with.

>>33061260
You know if you're going pretty much do that, why buy a glock at all and not just buy an entirely different gun that does not need all that to work?

>buy glock
Cool.
>replace sights
Unnecessary unless you want night or suppressor height sights.
>replace springs
Almost no one does this.
>replace trigger
3.5lb connector is nice but unnecessary.
>cerekote
No need.
>replace barrel
Only if you want to suppress.
>put talon grip on
>sticky glue mess
Confirmed for never using them.
>burn grip with soldering iron
>looks like shit
Only retards do this.
>replace frame
Why?
>replace extractor
Why?
>replace ejector
Why?

>>33062575

>reading comprehension

I think you should stop using terms you do not understand the meaning of. It makes you look like a fucking retart

>>33062525
>>33062552
>>33062564
Yeah this perhaps is a bad analogy. Most people compare Glock to Honda Civic for muh reliability. Personally, I've been shooting pistols for years and the funny thing is.. I've owned more Glocks than any other brand of hand gun, and I have had the most problems from Glocks, way more than any other. I can't even mention this to people who carry Glock, they dismiss it right away, every time, always.

>>33062594
>retart

Ironic.

>>33062596
I was speaking in terms of how it's hated because of other people , much like BMW's are hated because of the drivers/owners.

I don't have any ounce of my personality invested in glocks, it sucks yours didn't work, mine have been fine, but I don't carry them.

>>33062483
Let me explain, cunt. Modularity gives you the option to replace parts that you may consider "inferior". I have had HK, Sig, and FN guns as well, and if I needed/wanted something on them replaced, their aftermarket and ability to accept those parts paled in comparison to the glock. That's not to say glocks are better guns, but no one is going to say they wouldn't rather have glocks market for non OEM parts when compare to other handguns.

>>33061260
Yes the Glock platform is famously modifiable. Just like the AR15 platform that this shit board jacks off to.

>>33062593
>Unnecessary unless you want night or suppressor height sights.
or you just want steel sights...

>Almost no one (replaces springs)
there's a fucking huge aftermarket for trigger kits / spring kits bruh

>cerekote no need
finish comes off, people cerekote

>replace barrel only if you want supress
yeah or if you want to shoot handloads or lead

>talon grips dont leave a mess heu you never used one
are you a fucking retard?

>only retards stipple glocks
so, a huge majority of glock ownership

>why replace frame?
because you fucked up your stipple job, because the talon isn't good enough, because the original frame texture was inadequate. learn to deduce shit faggot

>why replace extractor?
learn to fucking read

>why replace ejector?
learn to fucking read

>>33062594
>It makes you look like a fucking retart

>>33061907
>I somehow miss the daily "IF YOU BUY ANYTHING BUT A GLOCK YOU SHOULD KILL YOURSELF" threads.

>>33062593
>why?
>why?
>why?

Because OP had to set the stage for his absolutely retarded argument because he's emotionally invested in what guns other people carry.

>>33062621
I wouldn't rather have Glock's aftermarket parts availability.

File: 1486262543078.jpg (37KB, 435x459px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 435x459px

OP checking in,

My "SET IT AND FORGET IT" bait thread is doing really well. Well, they sure do seem mad...

>>33062641
Funny, I see the opposite far more often.

>>33062552
Glock is more like the Toyota Corolla. It's a cheap workhorse. H&K and Walther would be like Audi A4 or BMW 3-Series.

>>33062729
best analogy right here
(especially because I dislike walther and the 3-series)

File: f48dd02cef5ba96b66143153fda668fdf295d13f4d0da96abe31869675e7434a_1.jpg (71KB, 744x533px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 744x533px

lol Glockfags, amiright?

>>33061323
I've never had any issues from my 17 or 34 and both are all OEM.

File: 1486708281986.gif (919KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

919KB, 480x270px

>>33062975
>what is anecdotal evidence

>>33062132
U serious?

>>33063021
yes

Just got my G20 gen 4. Only thing i dislike is the finish used om the slide; feels cheap and not durable compared to gen 3. I will say the trigger break and reset feel a little crisper than the gen 3.

>>33061260
>buy glock
>add nightsights

Gun is fine now.

>>33063217
>FTE
>brass to face
>FTE
>brass to face
>everything is fine

File: 1479169116517.jpg (77KB, 542x722px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 542x722px

>>33061260
>glock fags use a dremal tool to cut under the trigger guard so it doesn't hurt their hands
>mfw

File: free shrugs.jpg (100KB, 500x715px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 500x715px

>>33061260
>buy Glock
>replace sights, just like you would with literally any other service auto
>replace slide release with Glock OEM extendo-release
>if you bought a compact or subcompact, replace serrated "target" trigger with Glock OEM smooth trigger from a full-size
>done
>it just works

>>33061260
>custom slide finish
>TLR-1
>standard slights
>left handed
>poor grip
3/10
>>33061299
>>33061323
>replace the trigger to be able to use OEM magazines without being in violation of 922(r)
>get called a snowflake
pls
>>33061326
^

>>33062261
Got a used gen3 17...
I have had literally have 0 problems with the gun. About 2k rounds in. Not my favorite thing to shoot being honest, but reliable as a brick fershure.

File: Ergonomic-Similarities.jpg (244KB, 923x689px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 923x689px

I love my Glock. Perfect ergonomics, perfect grip angle, perfect accuracy, perfect part fit, it's just perfect. Here's a pic I took of 'er, and daaaamn aint she just PURDY

>>33064558
>922r
>pistols

No

File: 20170123_213722.jpg (897KB, 2235x1764px) Image search: [Google]

897KB, 2235x1764px

>>33061867
Ive seen USPs for as low as $404 + transfer.

>>33062636
>cerekote no need
finish comes off, people cerekote

Glock factory does inexpensive slide refinishing. <$75(?)

>>33066996
i bet those were all in 40.

I bought a $1000 USP Expert on the weekend. I might not even shoot it.

>>33062525
Pretty sure the Makarov gets more hate than the Glock on /k/.

File: 1484356291254.jpg (15KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 320x320px

>>33061260
>being so unoriginal you need a copy pasta for a non-containment post

Kys

>>33067823
Correct.

File: Glock 17 MOS.jpg (998KB, 1980x1125px) Image search: [Google]

998KB, 1980x1125px

>>33061260
You've got it all wrong. I didn't replace any of these parts because I had to, or because I wanted it to perform better. I did it to make it look cooler. I wanted steel accents against all the boring black, but I didn't want a shit brown Glock.

>>33061260
this is what, the tenth anti glock thread this week.

>>33068978
>cares about aesthetics

>buys glock

this why people think glock owners are retarded... because they are

>>33061549
neither of those make better pistols

>>33062729
Guess that makes Sig Sauer Mercedez-Benz

>>33071034
>Guess that makes Sig Sauer Lexus, a rebadged Toyota Corolla
ftfy

>>33061260
>buy Glock
>do a bunch of janky mods to it in my bedroom
>don't work right
>Glock sucks

>>33061549
Dude, only H&K and Walther make better pistols out of the provided list.

File: WP_20161220_012[1].jpg (799KB, 2517x1728px) Image search: [Google]

799KB, 2517x1728px

>Get Glawk 19 for $499
>Spend $80 on OEM trit sights
>$15 on a drop-in trigger bar from GHOST.INC
>Have a markedly better pistol less than $100 later that is complimented perfectly by a Surefire XC1
>Anons accuse you of dropping $500 on replacement parts in a fit of autistic shitposting
I always find more reasons to love this thing.

>>33061260
>Hate Glocks because of memes
>Post this pasta weekly to let other NEETs on a Nepalese Goat Cheese Making Board know you hate Glocks
>Continue to be a noguns.

>>33067846
Makarovs are great, though. What's not to like?

>>33062729
More like a Honda Accord.
It's pricier for the same reliability that could be had for less with the Corolla.
Glocks are honestly $350 guns that get sold for $550.

>>33071442
The cartridge, and being made by Slavs.

>>33071650
So nothing, then.

>>33061866
P-07fag here, I usually tell people to get a glock 19 if they don't have one already.

>>33067823
Every
Fucking
Time

>>33062525
The only I gun that I hate is the Ruger LCP. And that's because I hate the trigger, I hate how it feels, I hate how it shoots, I hate the bruise it left in the web of my hand, and it jammed with every magazine.

I'm sure glad it wasn't my gun.

>>33068978
What slide release is that?

>>33072602
Aro-Tek

>>33062405
Hello there noguns

File: 16465161_258353297909775_5172667584041975808_n.jpg (250KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 1080x1080px

I hated Glocks until I learned how to shoot. 1911s, CZs, and pistols with good triggers are immensely forgiving of sloppy marksmanship/trigger control.

Once I could hit with the Glock... the benefits of a lightweight, accurate, CHEAP, easy to maintain pistol became obvious.

Glocks are for poor people, or people who shoot a lot. No other gun is so purely focuses on value and performance like the Glock.

I will admit people who try to turn Glocks into "custom" pistols remind me of high school kids slamming junk onto their Honda Civics.

>>33074736
>Doesn't like custom Glock
>Goes full fauxland special

>>33074736
once was told a story about a shooting class a friend of mine was at, instructor takes out a glock and says something along the lines of "THIS, IS A TOOL."

Drops it on the ground.

Half the class wonders what the fuck hes doing, the other half are visibly disturbed, a few actually shuddering when it hit the ground. not out of fear, mind you.

Guess which ones shot glocks, and which ones shot 1911's.

>>33074769
>friend

bullshit

>>33074736
>for poor people

are you kidding a new glock costs the same as a new CZ. i dont know where the notion that glock is cheap came from. You glockfags are rediculous for always claiming this bullshit.

>>33074799
czs are cheap too.

>>33074799
This implies CZs are nice or expensive.

File: Cqm7ZmW.jpg (103KB, 1341x1252px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1341x1252px

>>33074760
Articulate a definition of "custom" that includes a Glock with a muzzle device, optic, and weaponlight but not an AR with a muzzle device, optic, and weaponlight.

>>33074799
>i dont know where the notion that glock is cheap came from.
Probably from people hearing urban youths using it as a genericized trademark and getting the wrong idea.

>>33074799
i can buy a ppq for the same price as a g19. i can buy a shield performance center cheaper than the g42.

Glocks are not cheap. I dont understand where that came from

>>33074835
CZs are far better quality.

not to mention walther makes pistols for the same price. my p99as was the same as a g19 and the quality is far better

When I was looking to purchase my first handgun I tried a bunch at the range. Now these would have been beaten up range mules and all but the Sig 229, the M&P I forget the name of, FNX 9mm, never had any trouble. Glock stovepipped every other shot. It was probably just because of being a range mule but if not then it meant how I held every other gun or limp wristed them didn't cause a problem but it did for the glock.

It clearly works for a lot of people but it seems clear that the glock has a big issue with limp wristing that no other handgun comparable does. "That's the fault of the user" - if these users never experience the problem with any other gun but do with glocks, then the glock is at fault.

>>33074799

Confusing used glock with new glock probably. For used prices I'd say glocks are very good, it's a case of >>33071632

>>33074877
new glocks are not cheap.

I personally dont buy used weapons (unless vintage or discontinued) I dont like the fact that another person fondled my trigger hole.

>>33074875
>CZs are far better quality.
hahaha
>not to mention walther
HAHAHAHAHA

>>33074902
are you retarded?

File: image_zpsc2244493 (1).jpg (36KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 800x600px

>>33074875
The delusion is strong with this one.

>>33074923
i don't own CZs or Walthers, so no.

>>33074926
that picture literally does not prove anything at all.

>>33074937
being retarded has nothing to do with that.. since you think one is correlated with the other its safe to assume that you are fucking retarded.

File: 2014-11-01133547_zps03f5e3d6.jpg (46KB, 1024x392px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 1024x392px

>>33074942
I think you're just stupid, sorry.

File: 1362540452943.png (12KB, 429x410px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 429x410px

>It's another "buttblasted povertyfags with cheap shit swear they don't have cheap shit because it's not a GLAWK but it's actually cheap shit" episode

>>33074901

Yeah I'm saying we confuse 'new glock' with the used glocks in the 300s range.

I can dig that if it's an CCW or gun you're looking to trust your life to. I like a sense of history and continuity, even as simple as "Kristof the podunk cop had it and never shot anyone with it". I like my 226 but if I were doing it over I'd get (besides a 229 for smaller size) a used one for cheaper if I could find it.

>>33074969
are you trying to point out that there is no striker safety?

bc there is one.. its that little pin on the bottom left.. You are a moron if that is what you were trying to show.

>>33074760

Anyone could slam together something like that in less than 10 minutes.... so it's really not custom at all. Just mass produced excellence.

An actual "custom" gun should be a 2011 or 1911 where actual expert fitting and real gunsmith work is REQUIRED to increase performance and reliability.

>>33074799

Glocks are cheap compared to Sigs, HKs, etc. They are cheap for adults with real jobs.

Factoring cost of ownership, ie, maintenance, support equipment, and money spent per reliable round fired... Glocks are a fantastic deal.

I will admit there Glocks do require a bit more user skill to get maximum value out of... people with limp wrists and low skills would definitely benefit from shooting a steel framed pistol with a good trigger like a BHP, CZ-75, 1911 etc... no denying that.

>>33075003

I assume the point is the very rough machining.

>>33062596
If you have had more Glocks than any other hand gun, wouldn't having more problems with said Glocks be logical?

>>33075003
are you fucking dense on purpose?

File: 20170220_152630.jpg (2MB, 2004x1384px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2004x1384px

>>33062636
Talon Grips don't leave a mess. I just put some on my Px4, it took about 15 minutes. I don't know how you could mess them up. It is without a doubt one of the best upgrades you can give to a handgun that doesn't have rubber grips as an option already.

>>33075016
that doesnt really mean anything as that really doesnt effect performance.

on another note that machining runs in the direction of the movement further adding to the point that it will not effect performance.


i will reiterate again that he is a moron.

>>33062596

What were your problems? I hated Glocks, but went full circle and decided Glocks are the best value by far after 10 years.

Tried every major brand and type of pistol... I can see why the Glock is the best selling pistol in America still. Basically the iPhone of the gun world: most support and adoption.

>>33061260
An aftermarket targeting the most commonly found firearm in North America. Wow, there must be something wrong with it, couldn't be that some people are trying to make some money off of the special snowflakes out there. I bet AR15's are inferior as well following your logic, we should trash those to!

>>33061439
What kind of trigger shoe is on that 43?

File: 213.jpg (14KB, 300x100px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 300x100px

>>33075050
>hehe my experience is the only experience
Found the fucking retard.

>live in arizona
>110F summers
>glock pressed against body all day
>interior of car is 130F when you get in
>talon glue heated up every fucking day
>just regular draw / dry fire practice makes has the talon grip losing position
>smearing talon grip around on frame of pistol
>hrur durrr there's no glue mess

also, you're a faggot for not buying the rough texture talon.

>>33075143
>didn't read or comprehend the OP before replying
how mad are you on a scale from 1 to 10 right now, be honest

File: glock9od_all_680.jpg (159KB, 720x479px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 720x479px

>buy Glock 19
>go shooting
>constant FTF and FTE with 115 grn ammo
>holding it as tightly as possible, still jamming harder than Jimi Hendrix
>look online
>apparently its a common issue for Glocks to fail with light ammo loads
>especially new ones
>sell Glock 19
>never touch Glocks again

>>33075189
The instructions very clearly state not to heat the grips up that much. If your climate is too hot for them, bummer.

If I lived somewhere where there was no night, then complained that my flashlight didn't do anything, am I the idiot or is the flashlight company the idiot?

>>33075235

What ammo?

Also, did you have a Gen 4? Early Gen 4 definitely had issues. I bought my first (3) Gen 4 Glocks this year, 2017, like a smart person haha

>>33075332
Wolf, Blazer, wwb and Fiocchi.
Bought it about 2 years ago. Gen 4

>>33075273
>the instructions say
who the fuck reads instructions on a $10 piece of grip tape? you, nigger

>>33075235
same here. I went through several different 19s and 17s, like the op said "fanboys tell me I'm dropping calls because I'm holding my iPhone wrong"

>>33075358

Aside from Fiochhi those are all famously bad ammo, and from the sounds of it you got one of the Gen 4 pistols that had ejector issues. The Gen 4 launch was as predicted, spotty.

I have had nothing but good luck with Blazer Brass and PMC with my newest production Gen 4s.

Sucks that yours was a lemon

>>33075405
I get that you're upset that you messed up, but you don't need to take your aggression out on me.

>>33071045
top kek, Sig owner here, somewhat true

>>33075235
I've never had any problems running Magtech 115 gr FMJ in my Gen4 19.

>>33075358
>Wolf, Blazer, wwb
Hahaha holy shit

>>33075185

ZEV possibly.

>>33077822
spotted the newfag

back you go >>>>>>/b/

>>33075235
>>apparently its a common issue for Glocks to fail with light ammo loads

I run dogshit Perfecta 115 through my third gen 17 weekly and it functions perfectly fine.

Dirty as a miner's ass crack, but it cycles 100%.

>>33075235
>>apparently its a common issue for Glocks to fail with light ammo loads

This is a common issue for many guns.

>>33077829

Huh?

>>33077855
its a common issue for glocks though, that's something that happens with them

>>33062368
it would be unsafe if you were a dumb faggot and ND into yourself.

there are plenty of videos of people dusting themselves on youtube using a traditional carry.

not being stupid is a factor in not shooting yourself.

>>33077882
I'm going to point out why you are wrong. Ready?

With appendix carry you break one of the 4 rules intentionally.

With traditional carry you only break that rule if you fuck up.

>>33077875
And I've had it happen with a berreta and a sig p320 (granted, they were rentals that the range was too lazy to clean)

>>33062368
not that guy, but how else are you going to carry a firearm concealed where it isnt pointed at a part of your body? i agree with you that appendix is more dangerous, but id be more worried about draw and reholster than anything

>>33077895
it's a common issues for glocks

>>33077896
you're not flagging yourself with traditional carry.

>>33077898
I've never had trouble with glocks

Don't shoot crappy ammo.

>>33077910
>my personal experience is everyone's experience

stop being butthurt and leave, faglord. common issue for glocks common issue for glocks common issue for glocks

>>33077894
the gun will not go off unless you pull the trigger

as long as you dont do this, you will be fine.

If you want to be a safety autist dont do it. I come from a place where we used to point our weapons at each other all the time and used blanks to conduct training, same thing applies there, as long as you arent fucking stupid you wont get hurt even if you are violating MUH RULES.

>>33077898
what is "traditional carry"

>>33077912
Common issue for all semi-autos.

Semi-autos BTFU, revolver master race.

(also, post stats or STFU)

>>33077918
This is why there's like 1 ND a month on /k/

>>33077918
>following the four rules of gun safety is autistic
>discarding them when you feel like pointing a gun at your femoral artery and balls is not
hey I noticed that you're wrong

>>33077930
good question. let's say 3:00

>>33077949
3:00 the gun is pointed at your outer thigh

>>33077960
There aren't any arteries there.

>>33077960
It should not be, you must not be using properly fitted equipment. Also, anyone can plainly see that someone with a sloppy 3:00 or 4:00 carry at most might sweep the surface of their ass cheek, compared to intentionally pointing a gun directly at your femoral artery and balls, a shot to either of those being a 99% chance to win a trip to the morge

>>33077976
>>33077973
i already conceded that appendix carry was more dangerous you autistic fuck, but youre still "violating the four basic gun laws" by carrying concealed in any manner. ho about you just be a little more careful reholstering so you dont shoot your dingus off

>>33077995
Hey greenhorn, not all of us have shitty muzzle discipline like you. Your inexperience is showing when you say obnoxious shit like "any concealed carry means muzzle sweeping"

I carry 3:00 OWB, and my muzzle is pointed safe, thanks very much.

>>33078015
what happens if you spread your feet to shoulder width? is your muzzle still "pointed safe"? and to clarify i was referring to iwb. i suppose i wansn't considering owb for concealed carry.

>>33078044
you're really grasping at straws here my dude. *manspreads legs out* well look at that, still pointed at the ground. I don't know, I'm not a fat slob, perhaps if I had huge rolls of fat hanging off my frame I could flag myself.

>>33075235
>apparently its a common issue for Glocks to fail with light ammo loads
The fuck? No, it isn't.

>>33074769
Righto, Buck Angel.

Been carrying a G26 for three years now, Literally left it stock,
>I hit targets
>goes bang every time
>only expense I put into it other than ammo are mags

>>33078080
Do you have a huge callus in the middle of your index fingertip from the serrated trigger?

>>33078070
surely some anontard on 4chan using a picture of Glocks that aren't his own, posting in a I Hate Glocks thread, wouldn't make up a story about how awful his experience with Glocks were...

>>33078139
>.t buttmad glocktard

>>33077918
Failing to follow such basic fucking principles on the grounds of "but I wouldn't make a mistake :^]" makes you a literal nigger. If you have to draw in a panicked situation, no matter how extensive your training, there remains the real possibility that you could fuck up and squeeze one off as you're drawing. Do you want your gun to be pointed at your arteries when that happens?

>>33078552
I think they are much more likely to remove themselves from the gene pool while re-holstering but yea this

>>33075235
This happened to me with a usp .45 I rented at the range. Every other shot jam jam jam. Sad! Looked online. Many such cases!

>>33061260
hahaha I always get a kick out of those fuckers

>buy glock
>fuck it up with 3rd party shit
>no long functions correctly
>HURR DUUR GLOCKS SUCK

>>33078552

Not the guy you're arguing with, but I'm a 32 year old army vet who's been shooting since I was 10.

I have never once, in my life, had a negligent or accidental discharge. Ever. If you somehow manage to "squeeze one off" as you draw, you don't know what the fuck you're doing.

Your finger only goes in the trigger guard when you're ready to shoot. not before. if you're finger is in that trigger guard before your weapon is oriented on target, you're an idiot and shouldn't be allowed to carry a gun.

manual safety is completely unnecessary for a carry gun. it's good to have on a longarm, simply because your AR15 or shotgun isn't in a holster, so their's nothing covering the trigger.... but a pistol that sits in a holster doesn't need a safety. at all.

you're wrong, and you're stupid.

>>33078826
More like
>buy glock
>it's shit
>try to fix it with 3rd party shit
>not really working
>keep it because you are poor
>later explodes and kills you
>eye witness tries to warn people online

>>33078106
Nope, guess I have the skin of a man and not of a 6 month old babies ass.