Is chinese type 55 destroyer most powerful warship?
Though some specifications especially radar and sensors aren't disclosed, Zumwalt doesn't seem any better than Type 55 except stealth.
>>33035115
No.
Next retarded question?
The important stuff is not told to you by those stats
Like will it burn to the water line & sink if hit
If it can intercept inbound missiles
And if its radar is good enough to spot F-35's, or if its missiles are good enough to shoot them down
13000 ton ship with a 280 crew sounds a little wonky too
>>33035115
>Is chinese type 55 destroyer most powerful warship?
Yes. You can't find a single warship that can go one on one with a type 55.
>>33035115
>only one CIWS
Yeah, no.
Enjoy eating shit when you run out of PD missiles in a prolonged engagement.
>>33035253
>13000 ton ship with a 280 crew sounds a little wonky too
Sounds like they're depending heavily on automation and high tech chink space magic. Which means that these ships can't take a punch.
>>33035835
>>33035124
This.
Not even 60+ year old designs are more powerful.
What a shitty thread even for a chicom.