trying to decide between red and green for a tr24, seems like

>>33021829
Red is more useful in all environments. Doesn't it have both? What's going on anon?

>>33021829
Personal preference. Go to a gun store and with both and see which you prefer

>>33021829
red

>>33021829

I personally own the red. It's an excellent optic so good choice there. You'll probably appreciate the red more I think.

>>33021829
Red looks cooler, it literally doesn't matter.

thanks guys. unfortunately I've yet to encounter a gun store around me with a decent optics selection, I'll just hope I make the right call

>>33021996
>red looks cooler

Gaymer detected

red contrasts better with more possible backgrounds. Green might blend in on a bright day in the woods. Red is a pretty unnatural color so it stick out.

>>33021829
red lights do not deminish your night time visiblity in dark conditions as other spectrum of lights do.

>>33022346
I should say as much as other colors at the same brightness settings.

>>33022346
Fuck yeah brah.
I was just going to post this.
Red light night light

Man, what a fucking waste of amazing glass. Why does Trijicon make a bomb proof, amazing quality optic and then put in a shitty reticle?

it doesn't matter

but if you have to choose, go red. red light is better to keep night vision capability if your eyes are adjusted to the dark.

>>33022308
As opposed to what? Bright green?

>>33022821
It's not a long range optic and as such doesn't need a complex BDC stupid nigger

Doping with a 4.5 moa triangle is simple for intermediate and close range shots

>>33022884
Still, Primary Arms, Vortex, Leupold, SWFA, and God knows how many more have done the same thing (making a short range optic,) that can still be used to reach out at longer ranges. You and Trijicon can both get fucked.