Is Hudson H9 the SCAR of handguns?

>>33012896
You mean the same thing as competitors only more expensive for being a slightly different flavor?

Probably.

dumb memegun

>>33013082
This.

File: 1484868020074.gif (2MB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x300px

>>33013069
>more reliable than any AR derivative to date
>more accurate than any AK derivative to date
>S-Stupid overpriced m-meme gun.
Oh, I forgot, neither matters to you because you'll never shoot anywhere but a range and couldn't shoot MOA to save your life.

Literally not even released yet, it's not the anything of anything

>>33013160
And like clockwork the butthurt the SCAR owner jumps out.

>>33013167
Voice of reason

>>33013167
That's what I thought, but I questioned if a few years have passed and I didn't notice.

>>33013168
Prove he wasn't talking about the H9.
Protip: You can't.

The SCAR is a good rifle, with a proven track record. There isn't anything wrong with the SCAR. It's expensive, yes. And for many people the features on the SCAR aren't worth the cost. But it's a quality product. This Hudson H9 is an unknown. I hope it's extremely successful, though.

>>33015864
>Comparing accuracy of a handgun to a rifle.
>HeCantBeSerious.jpg

It was obvious, I can't believe it's summer already