How practical would be the Sovensky Soyuz class?

>>33005818
No

>>33005824
I mean back in WW2

>>33005818
Not at all. The Red Navy got butchered to fuel the red army. Most it would've done is shell a port or just get left in port or most likely get ripped apart to make more T-34's.

Not very, the ruskies were not known for great use of naval assets and when they did they fucked up.

>>33005865
So the Soviets had no navy?

>>33006038

They had a few destroyers and a few small cruisers. That's about it.

>>33006084
they have a battlecruiser.

>>33006104
>>33006038
They "had" a largely WWI tier navy that was pretty much completely blockaded in port via intensive mining campaigns. Most was regulated to AA defense of ports they were stuck in. Soviet subs escaped and they got a lot of lend lease destroyers that helped escort runs and harass German ships. Overall though majority of the Soviet Navy manpower was diverted to land forces along with most of their smaller caliber guns.

>>33005850
Still no. There's nothing it could contribute to the Soviet war effort. Soviet Navy needed destroyers, minesweepers, sub chasers and submarines.

>>33006104
They had a couple of aging dreadnoughts; no battlecruiser.

>>33006147
>>33006633
https://c1.staticflickr.com/7/6086/6094601117_f5878a953c_b.jpg

>>33006752
WW2 retard.

>>33006752

Are you being purposefully dense or something? The fact that the OP started with a battleship should be a pretty solid clue that we're not talking about the era of missiles.