Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Anonymous
Is Robotech plausible 2017-02-10 06:35:31 Post No. 32943074
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Is Robotech plausible 2017-02-10 06:35:31 Post No. 32943074
[Report] Image search: [Google]
>>>/m/15191355
>>>/m/15191367
Is he right /k/?
For a trillion dollars, can we make a fighter jet that can transform into a bipedal robot?
>>
>>
>>32943074
No.
Also die.
>>
>>32943074
>Robotech
>>
>>32943103
All
Laughing
>>
>>32943074
This looks like a copy of Gundam
>>
File: destroid-monster.gif (167KB, 1000x777px) Image search:
[Google]
167KB, 1000x777px
>>32943074
dunno but this is surely
>>
>>32943074
No he's talking shit.
>>
>>32943948
Please. Most people don't even know that square part of the Gundam is a detachable jet.
>>
>>32943074
>For a trillion dollars
ten years and a trillion dollars? yes, you can have your bipedal transforming jet of fuckery and it can even be good.
it will at least be better and cheaper than the F-35
>>
>>32943074
>can we
Maybe.
>should we
Hell fucking no.
>>
>>32943074
a trillion dollars can make anything plausible, if you have a decade or two to develop it.
question is why would you put a trillion dollars on that.
>>
>>32943074
battletech is with current technology. I mean, ffs they call it the ATLAS project for christ's sake.
Thread posts: 13
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2