M9

>>32943020
It's an excellent gun for what it is but I can understand why the army chose the M17.

>>32943020
The safety is in kind of a dumb place, but other than that great gun. The sig is pretty much a direct upgrade tho.

>>32943020
Is the 90-two same as 92/m9?

I shot 92 and wasn't very fun.

>>32943020

its a perfectly fine pistol

the m9s were all shot out so instead of rebarreling them they bought glocks because hammer fired automatics are retarded

>>32943178
Yeah its the same, just with a space face lift

File: 1452821753696.jpg (46KB, 550x620px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 550x620px

>>32943020

I like it because it's heavily based on the Walther P-38, and I like DA/SA, as well as non-tilting short recoil barrels. My bias aside, I think the M9 largely gets a bad rap due to idiots who think they know firearms simply because they're in the military, or the ones they used we beat-to-shit 30-year-old handguns.

The P320 is an okay enough handgun, I guess, I'm just not personally a fan and think the Army should have gone with a Glock if they needed a polymer frame.

but that's just my personal feelings, so who gives a shit

It's heavy, huge, fires a wimpy round, and overly complicated. If you find one for like $300 I can see it being worth it, anything more and just about any handgun is a better choice.

The trigger is annoying as fuck. My #1 issue. I shoot my brothers snub nose more accurately than what i could do with the m9.

>>32943271
muh second strike capability

>>32943271
Once you go hammer you never go back.

>>32943271
>because hammer fired automatics are retarded
unable to understand how to operate so it must be the pistol.

>>32943178
it has frame and recoil spring improvements from the 92a1 as well as a beefier slide. dead sexy too.