when is this shit going to be declassified?

x47b

Those are of Russian origins that America cannot stop from flying over American land. It will not be declassified due to American National Embarrassment.

>>32909944
Vatnik plz. Russian satalites go over head every damn day. Like it would be an embarrassment.

File: IMG_1059.jpg (31KB, 604x246px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 604x246px

It will show its true face this year

>>32909882
>Declassified.
I don't see anything in that image to declassify, citizen.

It's already been declassified anon.
It's swamp gas.

>>32909889
no way it is

>>32909990
REEEEEEEEEEEE

never ever

>>32909882
it was a weather baloon, there is nothing to be declassified

B2. Photos are too bad to tell it's anything else.

File: NG-STV-1.jpg (480KB, 1200x1157px) Image search: [Google]

480KB, 1200x1157px

>>32909889
>x47b
>two contrails

;^)

which purposes unfulfilled by current aircraft are likely to be fulfilled by black aircraft?

>high speed ISR
>dedicated electronic warfare
>strike/interdiction (i.e. F-117/F-111). seems like a drone would be better for this

less likely
>SOCOM stealth VTOL transport

>unlikely
>air to air tanker
>interceptor
>cargo plane

File: 9D59E019-C8A0-4ABE-B90D-4ADD94B55D62-2592-000002441B4CFD30_tmp.png (26KB, 633x623px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 633x623px

>ssp
>igblying anything that isnt trandemensional should be of any concern.

When China shoots one down.

we dont talk about it.

>>32909990
What image?

>>32909882
DELETE YOUR ACCOUNT!

Shut it down!
The Goyim know!

>>32910165
Saved.

Too bad we'll never know what Lockheed's looks like.

Supposedly one of the 2014 sightings was one of the subscale demonstrators, while the other one was something VERY classified.

>>32911368
the wichita one is kind of sp00ky desu

File: not fbi.png (86KB, 283x283px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 283x283px

>>32909882
Weather balloon.

>>32909882
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_wing

You're an idiot.

why wouldn't this be the b21?

>>32911368
Yeah, that's what I've heard.

>>32909882

Cause they're prototypes and models being tested, utilizing secret tech?

>>32910096
This.

>>32909882
OP dont be a spaz. This is just a routine exercise.

>>32909944
what is it 1959? we can shoot down the moon you fucking idiot, why would we not be able to shoot something down in low orbit. Fuck dude we even shot pluto with a satellite recently

>>32911497

B21 has a similar profile to the B2.

These are clearly different designs.

>>32911442
Alright. So you can see that it's shaped like a triangle. Now tell what aircraft it is.

>>32911727
Wichita, KS looks like a B2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Grumman_B-2_Spirit
Amarillo, TX looks like a F-117
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_F-117_Nighthawk

If you're insinuating that these planes are top secret alien technology being flown from Jefferson AFB, I can't help you.
David Icke comes on late at night, maybe he can.

Wichita doesn't look like a B2. There's no tail. It's a triangle.

The same with Amarillo and a F117. No tail.

>>32911886
Hey, if you want to believe that grainy ass picture taken from that angle is inclusive of all forensically important data, be my guest.

File: 1479961717677.jpg (37KB, 540x431px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 540x431px

>>32911857
How dumb can you be? Neither of those shapes are right and there is literally no reason why an F117 would be flying around.

Newsflash autismo, the future isn't static and the Air Force has been working on stealth flying wing UAVs for literally decades now

File: 1478788909053.gif (932KB, 245x245px) Image search: [Google]

932KB, 245x245px

>>32911923
>When will the kids go back to school?

Sure thing, little buddy.

>>32911442
Yes, clearly it's an F-106 Delta Dart on the left. Because delta wings are the same as flying wings. Fucking idiot, why pretend you have a clue? Do you expect to be praised?

>>32911928
>haha I'm obviously wrong and mentally stuck in the 1980s but here's an ebin reaction image xD
Stop.

>>32911902

It's feasible that they're test birds, whether scale models or full sized.

Flying triangles aren't anything knew, and their shape seems to be the chosen design for low observable craft, so testings of classified craft of that shape isn't really "out there".

File: 1479699312093.jpg (95KB, 720x831px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 720x831px

>>32911940
Why are you still talking. I don't care about you're crackpot theories.
I said what I thought they looked like, I did not give an affirmative answer because no one can.
Go cry somewhere else. No one here cares.

>>32909882
Those are obviously a b2 and sr71..

>>32911956
>surely the Air Force doesn't test new aircraft! reeeeeeeeeee! help!!!

>>32911953
But where they're being flown sort of is.
Jefferson AFB is known for being a testing ground of development aircraft.
Security around J-AFB is extremely high, whereas anyone can take a picture in the places mentioned above. Also, those are pretty old pictures. There's no guarantee they still are classified.
This is an obvious bait thread and OP is persistent in being a little bitch.

Probably long range stealth UAV.

>>32911972
>Jefferson AFB is known for being a testing ground of development aircraft.
Fuck off. USAF procurement ended in 1985. Picture on left is an F-16 and pic on right is a C-130.

>>32911971
see
>>32911972
Quit being a little bitch and stay in school.

>>32909944
That's just smog.

>>32911978
>USAF procurement
>http://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/saf_fm/publication/afman65-604/afman65-604.pdf

Please end yourself

File: 3rd one.png (187KB, 750x422px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 750x422px

Looks like Amarillo