This kills the carrier.

>>32899871
This starts world war III

>>32899871
Aegis and CWIS kill the missiles. But, before that:

The CSG notices the Chink potmetal boats.

The Prowlers shut down signals.

The Hornets kill the potmetal tubs.

>>32899894

you mean notice like the chinese diesel sub that penetrated the carriers screen undetected back in 2011?

sure saw that coming, well they knew it was there once it surfaced a mile from the carrier mocked the failure of the US navys defense, and submerged and disappeared.

>>32899916
>Thinking the US engages any random sub they pick up
>Unironically thinking that any sub is a threat to a CSG
>ESPECIALLY chinkshit

Potmetal props are loud.

File: 1486270038872.png (194KB, 1185x891px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1185x891px

>>32899871
This kills the DF-21

File: 1486270431340.jpg (156KB, 1132x800px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1132x800px

>>32899938

>>32899936
in an alternate universe

>US carrier group picks up random submarine
>it gets too close for comfort
>sub gets scuttled
>/k/ points out the US failure to identify who it belonged to
>US so stoopid they just shoot everythin then they wunder y evryone h8 them LOL!

>>32900033
>Chinese missiles rely on American GPS guidance
What did they mean by this?

>dong peng
>dong

How's it kill the carrier, spray high temperature cream of sum yung gai all over it?

File: 1437347429175.jpg (773KB, 3000x2041px) Image search: [Google]

773KB, 3000x2041px

>>32899871

Don't you dare touch that Nimitz, PAAMS will stop you

>>32900033
>He thinks a plane made of zinc castings can notice anything America has before they notice it, lock it, and send a missile up its ass it never knew existed

>>32900048
fuck off britshit with your malfunctioning AA frigate

>>32899916
>undetected
top kek

Sort of like those Russian jets that buzzed the US ship were "undetected."

>>32899871
Are those 9mm bullits? Pls respond.

>>32899871

RODS OF GOD!

>>32899941
>>32899938
Good. I was about to post these
>this kills the bait thread
>this kills the 50 cent brigade

anyone got that screen cap of the dude sperging out over this?

>>32900048

Nice engine you have there, shame if a little hot water kills it.

>>32900048

Still no Aster BMD yet. Close though.

>>32900060

Only happens under certain operating profiles, which aren't combat ones.

Last year, HMS Defender alone had spend over 100 days protecting US and French carrier groups.

>>32900113

The warm water meme is just a meme.

These ships have spend significant amounts of in the Gulf, often exciting 9 month deployments. Yes, the engines do not remain within their expected output, but all ships that run turbines in hot weather also experience this degrade in power output.

>>32900156
Wasnt the response to this
>What do you call 30 million dead chinese?
>A great leap forward

Also, charge your fucking phone you animal

File: 015-HMS-Duncan.jpg (121KB, 1400x743px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1400x743px

>>32900048

File: 1466788555910.jpg (63KB, 319x317px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 319x317px

>>32900434

File: sp02022017[1].png (282KB, 550x760px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 550x760px

>>32900403

>>32899871
A system dependent on satellite tracking and a long ballistic flight, when satellites are trivial to evade and the target can do this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4KnCqcTEOU

>>32899916
If they have the capability to detect a submarine being operated by a nation that we may one day be in conflict with, why would they tell everyone about it and give them a reason to improve their equipment?

>>32900156
>programme
It's just the bongs or upsidedowners shitposting again, nothing to see here

>>32900603
Fun. but today you use hypersonic projectiles with GPS guided flight - you even can correct the projectiles flight path during flight.

>>32899916
You have no idea if the US Navy tracked it or not.

>>32900792
Still need to be able to find the target in the first place. As I said, satellites are trivial as fuck to track and evade.

And get through the AEGIS.
http://www.cleveland19.com/story/34426822/next-gen-standard-missile-3-completes-first-intercept-test

File: 35011346.jpg (309KB, 600x533px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 600x533px

>>32900879
why would need a sat for finding a target? you use sat for guid it into to target.

>>32900710
bongs are just jelly they have 0 real carriers so they have to constantly rationalize why theyre not a good asset. pathetic bongs

>>32901115

That doesn't even make sense.

>>32900687
This

>TAO, SONAR, we have a possible underwater contact bearing 228, requesting permission to go active
Can you identify what sub it is?
>We are getting good sound from it but cant identify the Sub Class or origin
Pentagon says new chinese sub is somewhere in the area, Stay passive, keep tracking and record the sounds
>Record sounds, aye aye

Oh man China, you sure got us, no idea you were there, your sub sooo quiet we looky looky for it long time.

>>32899871
so?

File: diehl42.jpg (7KB, 299x186px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 299x186px

you also could use GPS-guided supercavitation torpedos (223 Mile/Hour (mph).

>>32900792
>Using GPS
>When at war with the US
good luck.
Here's a list of just a few things the US could have installed on their sattelites to make GPS useless to anyone else:
1. Have a few of them transmit nonsense. The US would know which sats to ignore, everyone else doesn't. As usually 5 are visible, the US can get a good fix, you can't.
2. Total/selective phase offset- all satellites have a war mode wherein they offset their outputs by a given quantity. US recievers countercompensate, and know which sats are doing this, good luck compensating that without the exact value- which can change.
3. Selectively deactivate certain sats when needed- spy sats detect your weapons launch, all GPS over the Pacific gets shut down for 20 minutes until you're completely off target.
4. Coded transmissions.
5. This would require significantly more complex sats: transmitting on a different freq. US recievers get built to use both, until they use it for the first time you can't know exactly what it is or tune any of your antennas.
6. Any combination of the above.
TLDR any hostile foreign country planning on using GPS is in for a nasty shock.

>>32901098
>you use sat for guid it into to target.
Nice self portrait.

How are you going to achieve that when the CBG knows exactly when and where satellites that could do the guidance will be and just not be in the coverage area?

File: ameriball.png (94KB, 1000x518px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1000x518px

>>32901160
>>32901149

>>32901174
why would you even start a attack when this would be possible? it is not posisble. because this is not your verzione or AT&T.

plus: you could guide the weapon also with a high altitude flight or with an (hypersonic) drone. or in combination wiht sats.

plus: you dont need a 1:1 guideance for such an big target. you will hit it even if it does its funny walfish maneuvers.

File: 1122.jpg (457KB, 1000x514px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 1000x514px

>>32901160
>>Using GPS
>>When at war with the US

>>32901262
20 RMB have been deposited into your account.

File: geo_orbit1[1].gif (19KB, 551x276px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 551x276px

>>32901262
Holy shit you're an idiot.

The satellites able to find a CBG have an orbital period of 88-127 minutes, and it shifts each time. And we know exactly where every single satellite is in orbit.

>plus: you could guide the weapon also with a high altitude flight or with an (hypersonic) drone. or in combination wiht sats.
Good luck getting that close enough to a CBG with the AEGIS and Air Wing coverage.

>plus: you dont need a 1:1 guideance for such an big target. you will hit it even if it does its funny walfish maneuvers.
Dumbass. You can't adjust a ballistic missile's trajectory that much. Especially if it's hypersonic.

>>32901149
basically just pretending to be retarded

File: big_miss_many_such_cases.jpg (57KB, 490x314px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 490x314px

>>32899871
You did not sink my battleship

>>32901333
you still stick in the 1980's bro

>>32901333
plus you never use a single warhead. even a indirect hit will sunk this shit.

YOU LOST

>>32901448

Sink. It's sink my dude. Not sunk.

File: 316834.jpg (28KB, 494x342px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 494x342px

>>32899871
>>32901396
/thread

File: 45wb74.png (322KB, 524x376px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 524x376px

>>32901396

>>32901460
https://youtu.be/L7fgO0VTOgY

>>32901415
>>32901448
>I don't have a fucking clue what I'm talking about, and actually buy the Chinese propaganda about ballistic anti-ship missiles

We know where the sats you can use to target are. Anything inside the atmosphere to track and target is easy to shoot down. US carriers are one of the fastest ships on the sea thanks to nuclear power. We have effective anti-ballistic missiles. This fucking meme is tiresome.

>>32901496
Must be that Chinese manufacturing again.

>>32901536
No gwailo, you forget missile super maneuver while hypersonic to hit stupid american carrier. China number 1!

>>32900687
Lol at the level of delusion ahahah
And Germany lost the war on purpose just to hide its real power level in case of war with aliums

>>32899871
>not realizing that the rest of the CSG picked that shit up and is shooting it down
>implying two battleshit shells could kill a carrier entirely
>implying this doesn't start the falloutification of the world
fuck off

>>32901448
Unless you're using nukes, you need to get multiple hits to sink a carrier. If you're using nukes, you still need to get to within a quarter mile abeam to have a chance of doing enough hull damage to sink a carrier.

If you fire a nuke at a US carrier, you just started a nuclear war with an opponent who has 20 or 30 times as many warheads as you do. That is not a wise thing to do.

You forget, the US invented nuclear warfare and used it on an Asian country that attacked our naval forces.

>>32901721
>You forget, the US invented nuclear warfare and used it on an Asian country that attacked our naval forces.
And our current CiC is just itching for an excuse to nuke somebody.

>>32899871
>Dong Peng

Peng means pew in German. Dong. Pew.

>>32899871
>This baits /k/

FTFY

>>32901629
Go back to high school.

File: 1482856725787.jpg (170KB, 483x713px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 483x713px

daily reminder that chinamens steal anything and everything.

>>32902714
>Spend billions of dollars and decades building worlds most advanced space-weapon
>Total war breaks out in Europe
>Shoot the Shetland Islands

File: World of BRRRRT.jpg (125KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 960x720px

>>32902714
Sometimes they improve it, though.

>>32899916
Parking a sub, and killing all systems, and waiting on the seafloor is what they did.

>>32899916
How often are US carriers not escorted by a US submarine.

>>32906089
Never. Subs are part of the carrier battle group. At least 2 usually.

>>32899871
>US goes to war with China
>Deploys THAAD on Taiwan + the PAC 3 missiles that are already deployed there

This kills the DF-21

>>32906449
Don't forget SM-3 Block IIA.

>>32900048
The HMS Buttplug

>>32902764
How many A-10s would it take to win world war II?

An even dozen?

File: ioncannon_1024.jpg (167KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1024x768px

>>32902714
semi-annual by fiscal year reminder that tom clancy steal anything and everything

>>32902730
underrated post

>>32907371

literally one

granted they can develop even shitty GAU-8 ammo for its cannon, dropping a fuckload of 500lb bombs and being literally unkillable would be pretty handy m8

>>32902714
>Steal tech
>Save billions on R&D
>Spend said saved billions on production
Sounds good to me

>>32907972
>literally one
>a single a-10 can control an entire theater of war

>>32908526
Yeah, they would need a load of pilots and techs to keep that sucker airborne for most of the time.

File: 1483400771008.png (533KB, 459x612px) Image search: [Google]

533KB, 459x612px

>>32899936
>WOOSHWOOSHWOOSHWOOSH
Pakmai itta so stirnky inna here. Lettas ahsurferse to get breh of fresha air

>>32901547
>projectile rusts mid flight

>>32899916
Fuck off, statistic. Also, Taiwan is independent just like Tibet.

>>32908330
Yeah that only works when you can properly copy it. I recognize the fact that you have unlimited shit metal by harvesting it from the illegal second children via cremation, but in order to actually save money you need to have something that works. Doesn't matter if you copy off your friends math homework if you write it in the wrong order and the answer is just a bunch of letters instead of numbers.

>>32899871
Also a sure fire way to have nukes hitting your mainland within 30 minutes, try it faggot.

I really wish any nation that talks shit about American's military might would try to fight them but they don't they talk shit because they're afraid and without the use of nukes they would get raped.

>>32909648
Touché

>>32901158
gps, torpedo

underwater...

think brother.

>>32909811
You must be 18 to post here.

>>32905138
finally someone that even has a sliver of naval combat knowledge. id almost given up hope as i was reading down.

>>32901158
>GPS
>Guiding Chinese weapons
wew

File: laughing operator.jpg (25KB, 480x220px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 480x220px

>>32899916
>undetected

>>32910605

aaayep, thinking ain't in the cards for this fella

>>32910720
http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/news/a18094/a-chinese-submarine-stalked-an-american-aircraft-carrier/

>>32910720


has happened multiple times.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-492804/The-uninvited-guest-Chinese-sub-pops-middle-U-S-Navy-exercise-leaving-military-chiefs-red-faced.html

File: 1486288423897.gif (1MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x240px

>>32910746
>Same article from 2007 posted for the 1000th time.

You're either a 50 cent nigger who ran out of material or a newfag.

>>32907972

no. WWII fighters would rip an A-10 to shreds the second it slowed down for any sort of attack run. You don't seem to realize that the A-10 is a big, slow target. The auto cannons on german planes, even with ammunition available during that period, would punch fist sized holes through the air frame. You're also talking about 8-10 fighters at least, considering german tactics at the time and german air power. it would get swarmed and shot to pieces. is it not a dog fighter. it wouldn't stand a chance.

>>32910804
>He thinks German props can match an A-10 in energy

>>32910743
>>32910746
If they were that good we would never have known about it.

>>32909648
They seemed to have their shit together when they copied French high-speed train. And that's the one example.

>>32911661
They don't need to.

>ITT asshurt americucks

Nice superiority complex there, shartinmarts.

>>32911762
bootlicker

>>32902714
>Americans
>Fire space laser at some fucking dolphins in the Moray Firth
>Chinese
>Fire space laser at Frankfurt
Honestly the chinks have the more sensible poster here.

>>32900879
>aegis
>saving you from hypersonic reentry vehicles cruising along mach 20+
Do you people even know what aegis is designed for?

>>32912504
http://www.scout.com/military/warrior/story/1677991-new-sm-3-iia-missile-hits-first-space-target

>>32912404
>being this mad

>>32908526

Lets consider that since they now have an A-10, they're going to reverse engineer at least a shitty version of it. Throw 12 M2 .50's in the nose instead of a GAU-8.

Hell they basically had WW2 A-10s in the form of those B-25s that had fucking 75mm cannons strapped inside.

>>32910804

Why would they slow down for an attack with enemy air power in the vicinity ? They could easily wait for other fighters to deal with them while completely out powering and outclimbing all of them.

Then it would have free reign to literally rape the ground and everything on it.

I'd love to see what a GAU-8 would do to a bomber group of Ju-88s...

File: 1479814518362.gif (1MB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x250px

>>32912585
>GAU-8
>firing at an air target

>>32912612

I obviously just fucking around, but really what would be the problem with that ? I'm aware the A-10 is a ground attack aircraft. Has an A-10 ever needed to fire its cannon at an aircraft ?

Couldn't it come from an angle above the bombers ?

File: IMG_0186.jpg (42KB, 601x429px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 601x429px

>>32910746
what the fuck do you chinks expect us to do? Fire upon every submarine we detect belonging to a nation we have peace with? A Chinese cold-war era submarine surfacing in the middle of an American naval formation is not valid grounds for an act of war, and if you think otherwise, you're retarded. Literally no reason not to just sit back and let them think we can't detect them, then can the little shits if real war ever breaks out.

>>32912660
I just had the thought that firing the thing while in any sort of climb would slow the aircraft to below stall speed.

>>32906236
I was asking our PRC OP. Who apparently had no clue.