Removing decocker from pistol

File: ss+(2016-11-08+at+02.24.14).jpg (67KB, 667x361px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 667x361px

>>32890893
There is certainly a way to do that, all you have to do is just remove the decocker

>>32890893
I wouldnt carry a modified firearm for self defense

File: SafetyDrumDecockShouldr-Wearanot.jpg (53KB, 480x330px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 480x330px

>>32890893
OP here, i found some pictures

File: Screenshot_2017-02-05-12-38-18.png (340KB, 480x800px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 480x800px

>>32891143

>>32890893
>Is it possible? I want to carry a P64 cocked and locked, but the P64 has a decocker/safety. How would i go about removing the decocker part?

It would not be cocked and locked, it would just be cocked

carrying it around cocked when it was not designed for that is about the stupidest thing you could possibly do

File: Screenshot_2017-02-05-12-38-41.png (323KB, 480x800px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 480x800px

>>32891150

>>32891157
It would be locked if i can remove/modify the bit that decocks it while still keeping the safety part

Or did you not understand the question

File: SovietPistols.jpg (2MB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2592x1936px

>>32890893
My guess is that you'd be better off buying an ATI 1911 for 400 bucks than bubbaing a cheaper gun that wasn't designed for it.

Plus, if you fuck up a P-64, you'll have better luck buying a new one than finding parts.

File: IMG_6590.jpg (446KB, 1547x1051px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 1547x1051px

>>32891175
>It would be locked if i can remove/modify the bit that decocks it while still keeping the safety part

not a good idea anon, the safety was not meant to be engaged with the hammer back and carried that way, this could cause several things one being a safety not designed to be strong enough to keep the hammer back in the case of the firearm being dropped because it was not designed for that

get one of those little sig 1911 type carry guns if you want to carry something designed to be carried cocked and locked

i get where you are coming from but modifying a carry firearm in this way is a really really horrible idea, sorry

>>32890893
Don't do that. Buy a real gun for self defense and stop Sucking so much cock. Youre going to shoot yourself with that p64.

>>32890893
Why not just carry DA/SA like it was intended for?

File: 1471503558076.gif (2MB, 470x339px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 470x339px

enjoy the value of your firearm dropping to $0

enjoy ur accidental discharge

>>32891175
>It would be locked if i can remove/modify the bit that decocks it while still keeping the safety part

the safety only engages with the hammer forward, the notch is in the wrong place with the hammer back

think about what you are talking about

File: tips ushanka.png (292KB, 416x424px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 416x424px

>>32890893
>carrying anything but a 9mm

>>32891283

it is 9mm anon

>>32891231
B-because i don't want to carry like that

>>32891215
>the safety might not be strong enough
An interesting thought, but the safety is more for the trigger than anything

>>32891279
>literally what is 'modify'
You're acting like it's impossible to make a SA gun

>>32891093
You're implying the brain dead fucktards looking at it will know the difference?

>>32891304
>You're acting like it's impossible to make a SA gun

it's easy as fuck

and just as dumb

you couldn't do this right because of the way that the P64's safety functions

the decocker part is also the part that disengages the trigger
there is also a hammer block, but there'd be nothing preventing you from pulling the trigger and dropping the hammer on that block

if you want to carry cocked and locked, I'd advise finding a different firearm

if you're just unhappy with the weight of the first round trigger pull, get a spring kit from Wolff Gunsprings
you can drop the 24 lbs hammer spring down to 18 lbs
improves bother the DA and SA trigger pulk

File: taxedenoughalready.jpg (261KB, 959x632px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 959x632px

let's be unsafe and retarded

the thread

>>32891283
9mm makarov is still a 9mm/

>>32890893
Waltherfag here: Three important things happen when you engage the manual safety:
First: The sear is locked. If the hammer was cocked then you will be able to pull the trigger to no end. If the hammer was seated then you will not be able to pull the trigger.
Second: The hammer is decocked. I do not need to explain this.
Third: The firing pin is physically blocked.

You cannot disable the decocker (#2), without disabling the trigger/sear lock (#1). However, with #2 and consequently #1 disabled the firing pin block (#3) is still functional.

While a manual safety that does not lock the trigger is an unusual device, it is still a fully fledged safety that would be accurately classified as Condition 1: Cocked and Locked. Instead of locking the hammer or trigger, it locks the firing pin.
This is especially important considering that like the PP(K), the P-64 rape baby is NOT drop safe with the manual safety off.

>>32891394
Where the fuck is a single parent pulling 6 figures? Also, paying an extra 3 grand is a drop in the bucket if you are pulling 260K.

Fucking hell, that's only a few thousand under 10 times what I made last year.

>>32891394
>tfw everyone excluding the retired couple is in the top 2%
>tfw the retired couple is in the top 3%

at least anon is staying on point and is posting retarded shit

>>32891446
>Also, paying an extra 3 grand is a drop in the bucket if you are pulling 260K.

she can barely afford it, look at her sad face

>>32891408
Sounds interesting.

When people talk about drop safe, how safe is that? Would a cond 0 p64 go off after a particularly hard pothole, or do you actually have to drop the thing?

>>32891476
>>tfw everyone excluding the retired couple is in the top 2%
>>tfw the retired couple is in the top 3%

they are barely scraping by anon, Obama nearly bankrupted them with his tax hikes

>>32891446
This

Fuck outta here with this "wah, i only made half a million dollars last year after taxes" bullshit

>>32891314
You're implying no one can have an expert look at it.

>>32891490
You likely would have to drop it directly on the hammer or maybe on the muzzle to get it to go bang. Basically the hammer is just sitting on the firing pin, and just needs a good wack.

>>32891530
>You likely would have to drop it directly on the hammer or maybe on the muzzle to get it to go bang. Basically the hammer is just sitting on the firing pin, and just needs a good wack.

>british design

>>32891530
this is not true of the P64
the P64 is drop safe
you'll hear about how it isn't, but it's fuddlore

>>32891507
>>32891481
Her post tax earnings are almost 5 times as much as I made before taxes. If you can't live on 200k take home pay with only 3 people in the family, you have nigger tier budgeting skills.

>>32891530
I was thinking cocked, actually

>>32891490
I don't mean to sound rude, but drop safe is a large-scope term that encompasses all sorts of impulse tests. The most basic of these is a hammer that rests on an unlocked firing pin will fire when dropped.
>>32891530
or you get hit by a car,
or you get in a car accident,
or you trip and fall,
et cetera
>>32891545
>the P-64 is drop safe
ONLY with the safety on
t. have actually tested this

>>32890893
I actually just finished re-assembling the slide on a p-64 today, not sure if it's possible to do what you're asking but I'd implore you not to take that fucking slide apart, putting it back together was hell

>>32891550
>Her post tax earnings are almost 5 times as much as I made before taxes. If you can't live on 200k take home pay with only 3 people in the family, you have nigger tier budgeting skills.

tell that to her starving children

>>32891551
I wouldn't advise carrying in single action with the safety off (because you're retarded if you think you can nigger rig it to be cocked and locked). The trigger on mine is way too light on single action for a safety free carry.

>>32891560
how, pray tell, did you test this?
because as far as I can tell on mine, it has a rebounding hammer which should be drop safe

>>32891561
I saw a pdf of taking the thing apart, so many little pins and shit

Almost just easier to cc a slapgun

>>32891577
>t. didn't answer the question

>>32891589
The absolute worst part was the loaded chamber indicator, needed my wife to help me since I don't have three fucking hands, required me having a long pokey thing in both hands as well to hold that fucking spring back. I actually took her shooting today for the first time (gun,not wife) and couldn't believe how uncomfortable shooting it was. I have those nice wood grips on it and absolutely love how it looks though

If you do this OP you will never be able to resell the firearm

>>32891605
>needed my wife to help

post pics of gun helpful wife for me to jerk to

>>32891589
Except you only strip the slide for replacing parts. Field stripped, they break down into 3 parts (not counting the magazine). Slide, recoil spring, and receiver.

>>32891626
haha she wasn't happy about it anon, she puts up with my gun shit but if she knew I keep all my guns loaded in the closet she'd flip. She also thinks I have ~4 when I have 7 and spend all of our money on gun shit

>>32891605
...the p64 has a loaded chamber indicator? Gross
>>32891609
>what is swapping out the modified pieces before selling

>>32891652
Have you seen how they do it? The LCI is cooler than shit on the p-64, just don't ever take it out

File: BabyBrowning.jpg (1MB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x1936px

>>32891605
Before I bought mine, everyone bitched about how snappy they are, but I've never really had trouble with it.

The only pistol I have with ridiculous recoil is my baby browning. You would think that tiny thing had that much kick.

>>32891652
>...the p64 has a loaded chamber indicator? Gross
It's really just an unobtrusive little nub.

>>32891581
>at workbench
>pull bullet and dump powder
>insert earpro
>pull back slide
>push up the slide lock lever inside
>insert primed empty case into the chamber
>run the slide
>drop hammer via trigger, not decocker
>slam pistol against workbench on the hammer

>>32891645
>haha she wasn't happy about it anon, she puts up with my gun shit but if she knew I keep all my guns loaded in the closet she'd flip. She also thinks I have ~4 when I have 7 and spend all of our money on gun shit

we still need pics, crop face

>I know a guy whose wife thinks he just has a 1911
> he has like 10 1911s and she thinks they are all the same gun, she would flip if she knew he's got over $6000 in firearms

>>32891686

absolute madman

>>32891686
Did you try smacking it muzzle first? I'd be curious if the hammer would move hard enough via inertia.

>>32891733
I did not and do not intend to. However, the discharge proves that it could happen with a sudden enough deceleration.

>>32891567
Her kids look pretty fat to me