Project Harp

>>32879400
>250+KM

did you just pull that out of your ass?
Also, km is spelled with small letters.

>>32879400
Fuck off with your false-flag bb-treads.
This board is full enough with shitty treads as it is

File: 1.jpg (139KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1024x576px

>>32879400
>bringing back the battleship

Why not just build a gun in the US big enough to shell anywhere on the planet?

>>32879400
cheaper, ye, more effective, no

until we have railgun, plane with missiles will always have vastly longer range

>>32879418
I kinda pulled it out of my ass, but if you shoot a projectile fast enough and itskip across the atmosphere and glide when it reenters the atmosphere you can get long range artillery.

>>32879400
>with Trump considering bringing back the battleship
Can you not make shit up?

>>32879451

Guns are more difficult for the enemy to to disable if you can move them.

>>32879400
>question then becomes how much would it cost.
Did the math and it comes up to 486 821 705$

>>32879400
The Long Range Land Attack Projectile (LRLAP) before it was canceled reached whoping cost of $4500000, x10 times of JDAM. ""cheaper alternative""
>lang range gun bombardment
>cheap
Pick one.

Now Zumwalt battleships built around LRLAP have none of them. Is this most useless ship ever build or most useless ship ever build?

File: Chandalier.jpg (24KB, 600x337px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 600x337px

>>32879400
Fucking Canadians had Belkan levels of crazy scientists.

>>32879400
The range is also 279 875 m

File: 1479961717677.jpg (37KB, 540x431px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 540x431px

>>32879400
>Bring back the [RETARDED PROJECT FROM THE 1940S]!!!
Fuck off forever.