Tell me why I shouldn't get one. >Inb4 bullpup a shit

But you should, faggot.

>>32863096
It's a good gun but the Lithgow might make more sense.

>>32863096
You're really not going to get much, if any, better performance compared to a cheaper AR.

Not that it will perform poorly mind you. The AUG is a fantastic rifle.

>>32863096
You should.

If you're going to get one, get the white one. It's sexy. Also, skip the factory optic they're not that great.

>>32863096
An AR-15 will do pretty much the same thing but cheaper. However, it won't look as sexy.

bullshit a pup

>>32863096
Get the A1 pussy.

>>32863096
The way I look at it, anon, is this:
Do you want it? Is buying it an irresponsible financial decision?
If you want the rifle, and can afford it, go for it! You know what they say sweetheart, if you know how many guns you have, you don't have enough

Any AUG that isn't the OG AUG is a fucking mistake.

>>32863096
>Special snowflake mags
>No left-handed ejection
>No adjustable LOP
>Limited options for handling
>Gross trigger
>They look stupid

>>32863450
>plenty of models that accept standard AR mags
>$200 replacement bolt (don't cry southpaw, it's the same cost as a cuck stamp) and you can have your sinister ejection
>having freaky long arms that can't get a snug fit on the AUG
>it's different from an AR therefore it's handling options are 'limited'
>alright, the stock trigger sucks, but you can fix it and it's not unusable
>having shit taste

I'm sorry you're a creepy left-handed weirdo with shit taste and spindly arms, maybe you wouldn't need to lash out on a Filipino Scrapbooking forum if God had make you right.

File: RFB.jpg (202KB, 1280x852px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1280x852px

>>32863096

more expensive than an RFB/RDB and worse

but if you just think they are rad and you want one it's your money.

>>32863621
>Worse than a RFB or RDB
No, it isn't.

>>32863508
>By plenty of models, you mean a conversion kit for the A3 that disables left-hand ejection and the bolt stop and conveniently costs 300 bucks
>"Gee, let me throw even more money at this snowflake rifle to make it usable "
>Defending a rifle for manlets
>8+ inches of handguard on a conventional rifle with multiple ways to place your your hands, ability to mount handstops, afgs, vfgs of all sizes, gripods, or just grip the magwell vs gripping the trigger guard or Chicken-choking the afg

>>32863621
>Buying Meme-Tec anything.

It's like a fastener bukkake

>>32863096

Not much reason not to, it's pretty good.

>>32863096
git it

>>32863417
Fuck off

>>32863126
>Lithgow
>aug
these are completely different types of guns

>>32864248
Lithgow Atrax completely different from the AUG? I mean, yes it's fairly heavily modified, but completely different is a stretch.

File: IMG_2059.jpg (408KB, 1620x1080px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 1620x1080px

Errr you should

File: finalaug.png (210KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 800x533px

>>32863096

Get the AUG A3 if you can, the A3 M1's have a little narrower aftermarket and the top rails aren't long enough to use iron sights on.

But it's got a CHF/CL barrel made by FN, I believe the receivers are made by VLTOR. It has a forward assist and adjustable gas. It can either take AR/Stanag mags or Steyr mags which are arguably some of the best 5.56 magazines every devised by man.

You can not lose with the AUG. It's been weighed and measured for decades, and they're still filling military orders. The only reason you don't see more of them in the US is Steyr doesn't even have to fucking care about the US civilian market because of all the military contracts and license deals they get from that one rifle.

Nobody here - that isn't a literal queerbait - is going to try and dissuade you from getting one.

>>32863096
dont bother
trigger in AUG is plastic shite
lithgow is bringing out the f90 soon.
its way better ergo wise.

File: AUG Carriers.jpg (38KB, 500x359px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 500x359px

>>32863096

I always thought the bolt carrier design on the AUG was wicked smaht. It's "updside down" - below the bore axis. Pic related. So the reciprocating weight is kept low, which in a rifle as squat as the AUG is a good thing for muzzle rise.

Whereas rifles like the Tavor, Bren, and SCAR etc. have a much larger top-heavy design and you can definitely feel the difference. I dunno, I just thought it was cool the first time I shot the AUG how much different it felt than the Tavor especially.

>>32863508
>>32863793
OP here.
I've never held one. I am a literal giant at 6'7". Carbine length ARs feel like squirt guns. Am I going to hate my Austrian space blaster?

>>32864507

Hmmmm, that's definitely something to take into consideration. It's not incredibly short on the LOP, but I'm 6" shorter than you. You could also get an aftermarket (20/20, Suarez, or Steyr has one also I think) lower rail and just move a VFG out further if you wanted a little more space. I think you'd be fine though.

What are you giving for it?

>>32864318
>Nobody here - that isn't a literal queerbait - is going to try and dissuade you from getting one.

I, an actual Austrian, am going to. I would never get an AUG when I can have

https://www.atlanticfirearms.com/component/virtuemart/shipping-rifles/radical-firearm-16-5-56-m4-1-7-complete-rifle-with-12-fgs-round-rail-detail.html?Itemid=0

for less than third the price.

UAG was nice in 77 but this is 2017...

File: Autism_awareness_ribbon_fi.jpg (77KB, 630x485px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 630x485px

>>32864571

>Radical Firearms

>>32864609
Yes, I'd take 3-4 of those ARs over one AUG any day.

File: seh6p.gif (916KB, 245x285px) Image search: [Google]

916KB, 245x285px

>>32864638

Yeah they look real high quality. Bet your life on Radical Firearms.

https://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1837188_Please_do_not_support_Radical_Firearms__Everything_coming_loose___.html

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_3_118/670987_Problems_with_Radical_Firearms.html

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2016/08/25/breaking-radical-firearms-steps-line-makes-things-personal/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTCXtdGOlgE

https://www.reddit.com/r/ar15/comments/2t08x5/radical_firearms_barrel_issue/

I'll take the one functioning AUG over your 4 broken AR's.

>>32864565
I have a modern Gucci AR15 as a go to, looking to branch out but skip slavaboo shit. So in a $1800 price bracket, I'm eyeballing the AUG and a DSA FAL. I know the FAL will make me buy new ammo, but I don't have a battle rifle and C'mon its a FAL..

>>32864691
>https://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1837188_Please_do_not_support_Radical_Firearms__Everything_coming_loose___.html

I've had to change my AUG's bolt twice btw. - lugs love to shear off on those things.

>>32864507

It's pretty bulky and wide, and like the other anon said, it also has a slightly longer length of pull compared to other rifles.

But I would have no idea what it would feel like for a 6'7" person.

File: ZfoYBVa.jpg (65KB, 853x640px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 853x640px

最好

>>32864739
>I've had to change my AUG's bolt twice btw. - lugs love to shear off on those things.

said the man on the internet, lacking evidence.

>>32864699

Honestly if your AR is setup exactly how you like it, the AUG will be a big fit change for you. And if you're used to an upgraded AR trigger, you're in for a surprise with the AUG trigger - especially if it's a NATO version.

>>32864796

I should have put "potentially unpleasant surprise".

A Neutrigger helps a bit, but it's kind of a janky fix imo

>>32864834
Please elaborate on "janky".
Also I know both guns are larpy but that what I'm going for. And that the aesthetics are at a price.

File: WP_20160227_003[2].jpg (2MB, 3072x1728px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3072x1728px

>>32863893
How about you suck my cock after I yank it out of your spasming boipussy.

>>32864873

It's just a piece of polished spring steel you wrap and bend around your sear. The result is good but the though of just having a bent piece of steel in my trigger pack always made me wonder when it was going to fly off and jam the gun - but I've got a few thousand rounds through it and a couple carbine classes and it never went anywhere.

The "Trigger Tamer" is a little more solid option. I used both simultaneously with the Steyr stock and it was fine, but for some reason on the Nato stock it doubled up a couple shots and I said fuck that and ripped it out. Not sure why.

>>32864904
I have heard that the trigger is dogshit. Are there other options out there beside what you've mentioned? Or that Lithgow some other guy mentioned.. Is that any better.

>>32865091

It's not as dogshit as the Tavor factory trigger, but they do have the Geissele option. Honestly the neutrigger was enough to make me happy with it, but the trigger tamer works great too and you can get them both for under $100 total IIRC.

The lithgow I'm not sure about...they're making some big promises but it's all reminiscent of what I was hearing about the MSAR back then...If it winds up being good, great. But I feel like it's akin to saying the Galil ACE is better than an AK. You're talking about comparing a relatively new gun standing in the shadow of a gun with a massive track record of proven combat worthiness. Maybe it's a better gun, it very well could be, but personally I feel the guaranteed money is on the AUG.

I asked IV8888's crew when they were doing the Lithgow video if they took the same trigger pack and I never got an answer. Lithgow was suggesting that Geissele was working on a trigger pack for them. If it's compatible with an AUG trigger pack that would be great news.

File: FAL2.jpg (393KB, 679x1200px) Image search: [Google]

393KB, 679x1200px

>>32865176
Thanks for the info bro. You don't know anything about sa58s do you?
Pic semi related

>>32865308

I do not unfortunately know dick about FAL's. I went the SCAR route after falling for the PTR meme.

File: Screenshot_2017-02-02-21-11-20-1.png (281KB, 1080x358px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 1080x358px

Not OP but I have a question.
I want to buy an AUG and start a rifle collection (have an m16A2 clone)
But I want one that looks like the original A1

What civilian model could I buy?

File: 20161108_193506.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

>>32863096
> Tell me why I shouldn't get one.
You should get 2, one with NATO stock and one AUG stock for LULZ

>>32865489
http://www.pjs-steyraug.com/STG77.html

This one.

>>32865521
>http://www.pjs-steyraug.com/STG77.html

This is what gets me. Swarovski should have made this scope an option for the M1 in the first place, but nope. "Limited edition, gib us shekels!"

>>32865573
The stock optics on AUG rifles are dated. There are a lot better options now.

>>32865387
You made the right choice.

File: IMG_5647.jpg (2MB, 3628x3456px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3628x3456px

>>32865511

I just went with a spare stock, would love the spare AUG.

>>32865579

That's what I mean. The only reason people would want the stock scope is to make a retro build. The current scope is nothing like it, and it's not even the same one the Austrian military uses.

>>32863508
Manlet spotted.

Mine works great but I shoot left and I really don't like how close the rounds eject to my face.

>>32863096
Because they offer it in white faggot. Get the white one. Besides that good to go.

>>32863096
It's expensive as fuck.

>>32865635
People like me want a retro build though.
I want the rifle to look and feel Exactly like the military version.

File: lithgow_02-720x478.jpg (81KB, 720x478px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 720x478px

You're seriously much better off waiting for the Atrax to release.

Lithgow been in the business longer than most, and you're getting a civie version of a modern, yet proven platform.

File: aug_m1_grn_scope_fl_r.jpg (17KB, 600x265px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 600x265px

>>32866591

When I mean "the current scope," I mean this.

The Austrian AUG A3s in service now have similar looking scopes, but are much lower in height. So even this isn't faithful to the military ones.

>>32863137
>The AUG is a fantastic rifle.

Stop posting that. It is not. The Tavor, M17S, and RDB are significantly better rifles if for nothing but the trigger. The only thing the AUG has going for it is quick change barrels, which they've neglected to put to a good use like caliber changes.

>>32863664
>>Worse than a RFB or RDB
>No, it isn't

Yes, it is. Without the NATO stock they're terrible. With the NATO stock they're passable rifles.

File: mormon assault bullpup.jpg (184KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1920x1080px

>>32863096

>>32867473
>Yes, it is. Without the NATO stock they're terrible. With the NATO stock they're passable rifles.
>he said, without providing a single valid argument as to why.

Does anyone still make AUG clones?

File: SAM_0003.jpg (1MB, 2304x1728px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2304x1728px

>>32864888
>>32863893
>>32863417
>what is spraypaint
literally who cares.

>>32867041
The A3 scopes are mounted via picatinny rails, of course it sits lower. The A3 M1 is just for people who wanted a style of scope similar to the old A1's. Two entirely different concepts you're making comparisons to for some reason.

>>32867473
You're retarded. The NATO stock does nothing but let you use your stupid AR mags and removes several features from the rifle. I'm getting sick and tired of cry babies calling anything that's not an AR-15 magazine "proprietary."

>>32863096
Used one in the army, ambidex design is strange to me, and definitely focused on military style shooting (front on, plates forward, wide stance) instead of traditional civilian styles (accuracy).

I wouldn't buy one desu, AR and AK are both better in my experience.

>>32867884
Modern "civillian" shooting is identical to what you describe "military" shooting to be.

>>32867878
>You're retarded. The NATO stock does nothing but let you use your stupid AR mags and removes several features from the rifle. I'm getting sick and tired of cry babies calling anything that's not an AR-15 magazine "proprietary."

You're tired of people calling things that use a proprietary mag instead of a standard stanag Mag, proprietary?

Are you this dumb about everything?

File: 1411914435994.jpg (112KB, 600x701px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 600x701px

>>32867473
>Tavor
Built around aesthetics, no forward assist, no adjustable gas, worst trigger in the bullpup game, world's worst mag release position, "improved" version is 4moa at best. Next.

>Keltec
I mean really.

>Hurr durr Nato stock
I have both stocks and they're both fine, but Steyr mags are better than AR mags period.

>I'm not the biggest stupid noguns faggot in the world
The answer is yes, yes you are.

>>32867473
The AUG had 9mm variant swap kits. They got banned because no sporting purpose. I sincerely want Steyr to revive them and use the Colt style Uzi mags, but dreams are not often answered.

>>32868514
Should shotguns use stanag as well?

>>32868514
Basically everything used proprietary mags until recently. I don't know why people talk about it like it's a reason to discount a weapon completely. So it uses its own mags, like basically everything, big deal. The only reason this came up as a valid con is because
>Ruger thinking it's OK to charge 60$ for 5 and 10 rounders in the 90's, early 2000's
>people needing something to harp on to justify why they dislike something

If you're buying a 1700 dollar rifle, why the fuck would you care about spending 40 dollars a mag rather than 30 anyway?

>>32868514
If there's a copy of a magazine design, and there is of the AUG magazine, it's not proprietary. People really need to learn what that fucking word means. AR magazines are not a NATO standard and thus are not STANAG. Even if it were proprietary, the AR-15 magazine is a piece of shit and I'm tired of everyone forcing it onto every new gun design. It's literally the most garbage part of the AR-15.

>>32863096
because it doesn't have the original optic

>>32873861
What the fuck is wrong with the STANAG magazine that other magazines do better

>>32875872
Exist, for one.

>>32865781
But he's a manlet with an AUG so...you know...might wanna let him alone.

File: mpa971[1].jpg (27KB, 1210x237px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 1210x237px

>>32863126
>Lithgow Atrax
Wow something lmost as ugly as this