Boeing E-3F Sentry AWACS

AEW&C thread plox.

>>32856821
>>32856852
A joint AEW&C, EW and electronics thread would work instead of this.

File: lockheed_s3_viking_l2.jpg (174KB, 1024x676px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1024x676px

I had a thought a few days ago, take the Erieye radar of a SAAB 340 and stick it on top of a S-3 Viking.
Obviously there isn't much, or any, point. But is there any reason why it wouldn't work?

>>32856912
S-3 is good platform. ASW S-3, maybe this ES-3, KS-3, C-3. Can see I am a fan of Common Support Aircraft, LMT's S-3 or NOC's E/C-2.
As long as it is better than E-2D in a future replacement, which crew and payload would kill it off.

Why do people still use the dome AEWC, when there is the flat AESA radar like the gulfstream G550

File: 78070-flight_b.jpg (603KB, 1920x1079px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 1920x1079px

>>32857047
>flat AESA radar
I just pictures a Guppy with a four faced AN/SPY-6

>>32856821
min 4:06
That cheeky "Me cago en la madre que lo parió" tho.

Con un par jajajaja!

Op, beatiful pic, better video

>>32857047
Bump .

>>32856821
Ah... the FWAP, AKA the flying wireless access point.

>>32857047
Radar arrays can output more power directly perpendicular of the array, thus it's useful to be able to steer the array despite electronical scanning

>>32857514
Thanks.