PLANES
>>32848451
Getting my pilot's licence just made it more painful to consider all the aircraft I'm unlikely to ever have a shot at flying.
>>32848525
Not good with Russian Plons, is that an Su-27?
i have an unhealthy love for the B-36
>>32848590
Mig 29 top left, Su-27 middle left
>>32847415
>blackjack
>it's actually white
shake my head...
>>32848927
Hail to the king, baby!
>>32848927
Which is why it's called White Swan
>>32849151
Aye that's correct, Blackjack is just the NATO nickname for it
>>32848590
Anyone have more sexy Typhoon Pics?
>>32848927
>shake my head...
Bomber code names must start with B.
>>32849570
I'll take "sarcasm" for $500, Alex
older boys
>>32848977
Hohol genocide best day of my life.
>>32851501
>>32851548
The fuck is that? It's landing gear looks too big.
>>32851548
>>32851801
>>32851501
>Work on pic related
When will B1's and blackjacks fly together over Syria and fuck shit up?
>>32847311
Thanks OP!
>>32848697
Saw one in person when I was at an internship in Nebraska. Absolutely massive. One of my wishes is to explore inside one, especially to check out the crawlspaces in the wings.
>>32852086
>>32852159
>>32852086
Fuck, I love P37s. Something about them aesthetically just makes me thump.
I like razorbacks
>>32853971
Does the civilian C-130 actually exist?
>>32848702
Between the Mig-29 and the Su-27, which is the better air superiority fighter?
I'm curious about their differences in performance, the Su seems to be considerably larger, bigger than an F-15 even.
>>32854731
Su-27 by far, MiG-29 was designed as a cheaper fighter that could supplement the 27.
>>32854770
May be contentious, but how does it compare to the F-15?
It seems the Su-35 form may be more valid to compare.
>>32854809
Performance wise both aircraft were similar, but when you look at their engines and avionics the F-15 is superior in that regard. During the cold war these planes were comparable in their abilities. The AL-31s were better than the Klimov's the MiG used (horrible), but still weren't as nice as the F100s. I don't know much about the Russian air force but I doubt that the Su-35 would be a match for the newest F-15 block.
>>32853971
>>32853981
Yes. Here's one that looks exactly the same that sprays dispersants for an oil-spill response company.
F-16E/F Block 60
>tfw everyone loves Tomcat but nobody talks about her European cousin Tornado
The A-10C, arguably the best Close Air Support aircraft in the world.
>>32848927
you expect NATO nomenclature to make sense?
GTFO
>>32856708
Finally a nice colour scheme for Fulcrum.
>>32856753
I like the old green-grey scheme on the 9.12s and 9.13s, its sort of the Soviet equivalent of NATO Autism Grey.
Ukies and Slovaks have a few good one as well.
>>32856789
Malaysian Su-30?
>>32856770
Idk, I just love this recent blue-white pattern they use on Su-35S, Yak-130 and now MiG-35. I think I even saw Su-34 with it. Looks so clean and dandy :3
>>32856795
Yep, Malaysian Su-30MKM.
>>32856798
>>32856796
>Yak-130
>Nato codename: Mitten
>>32856804
>>32856806
The cutie.
>>32856815
Heh..Remember em' as a kid. Buzzin' in RMAF Butterworth air base. I do believe the Australian givin' one free to Malaysian as gate guardian if I was right.
RMAF Hawk 100. Note the Arden 30mm Gun Pod underneath.
>>32856832
Do you know how many still survive in Australia, there is still one at Forrest Hills IIRC.
>>32856833
>>32856811
MB-229CM, F-22A, Su-30MKM, F-15C, MiG-29NUB, F-18D? Did I get all right?
>>32856811
This is literally Ace Combat.
>>32856834
I'm not sure my friend. I also lost count about it. Here's the picture of Mirage III as RMAF Butterworth gate guardian. They also got rare CAAC Sabre too.
>>32856849
>>32856854
Here is the Forrest Hill Mirage, they actually have a pretty good museum out there.
No love for Su-25?
>>32856849
From top.
1) RMAF Bae Hawk 100
2) USAF F-22 from Hawaii
3) RMAF SU-30MKM
4) USAF F-15E from ANG
5) RMAF MiG-29N
6) RMAF F-18D
From 2014 Cope Taufan (Typhoon) exercise in Malaysia.
>>32856865
>>32856865
>>32856864
The RNZAF Skyhawk also based on Butterworth for some time too there. Here's New Zealand's Skyhawk with rare RMAF Canadair Tebuan .
>>32856869
What the hell isflying between A-10 and F-16?
>>32856871
A-10 and Su-25 together.
>>32856869
>That J-5
>You need air forces from three countries to match Indian air frame variation.
>this isn't even all combat types
>>32856878
MiG-15UTI trainer.
Typhoon over Malaysia during Bersama Lima FPDA exercise.
>>32856878
Look like MiG-15 trainer.
>>32856877
>for some time too there
When was that?
>>32856887
>>32855390
dc3 and its offspring gets my peepee hard.
>>32856890
Romanian Air Force F-16
>>32856900
>>32856865
>>32856905
>>32856882
Nigeria would try, if they had the money. Go look up the selection of small arms they use.
>>32856910
>>32856890
During late stage of Confrontation til' 1985. And then they pull back the fighters and placed some RNZAF personnel under RAAF RCB command.
The effectiveness of RNZAF Skyhawk also influence the RMAF to get some A-4PTM Skyhawk but they using them just limited amount of time due to pressure from Congress resulting lack of spare parts and armament.
Picture of rare A-4PTM Skyhawk.
>>32856913
>Go look up the selection of small arms they use.
>>32856918
>>32856926
>>32856930
>>32856926
Does the RAAF still got the F-18C version? I thought they already retired them and replace with Super Hornet?
>>32856925
Just think of it as a museum inventory rather than something you're suppsoed to supply with ammo, spares, training, and skilled armourers for in wartime.
>>32856937
>>32856940
RAAF never had the C.
They currently use the A, B, F and G.
>>32856949
Ugh really? Sorry. So does the RAAF replaced them or not?
>>32856940
>>32856946
RAAF only uses A/B versions (which are both still in service)
>>32856956
Still flying, to be replaced by the F-35.
>>32856913
>Go look up the selection of small arms they use.
>>32856957
>>32856967
>>32856972
>>32856981
>>32856986
>>32856986
>muh F-111
>>32856992
>>32856994
>>32856998
Shame when they left service, but the pigs were so expensive to maintain unfortunately.
>>32857004
>>32857009
>>32857012
>>32857024
>>32857030
>>32857030
>>32857030
TFW for not realized the RAAF also used BaE Hawk...
How many AMRAAMs could the F-111 carry if it was modified to serve as a missile truck? Two dozen, maybe?
>>32857099
if only the F-111B had been built, it could have carried like 16 Phoenixes
<TFW that this won't be flying operationally ever again...
>>32857199
>>32857218
>Jolly Rodgers
That tail art gets me hard every time. I hope LM gets the colored RAM coating for the F-35 so we can see dank tail art on them.
>>32857273
Same here. Jolly Rogers and Vandy-1 are the best Tomcat scheme.
>>32847311
Gnat is so damn cute.
>>32857349
Wait, what, this thing wasn't VTOL? Bye then!
>>32857320
To bad. America Navy retired them quickly. Even after giving a sterling service especially when Gnat unit successfully bombed Saddam Hussein and his nuclear plant.
>>32857380
>>32856777
THICC, nice trips
>>32857441
9.19 is a thicc babe.
>>32847311
Polish F-16 with cft's and the new AGM-158 JASSM missiles.
Fucking hot.
>>32857457
Damn, a Hornet spraying a hot load all over that.. Hnnnngg
Love me them thicc chicks.
>>32857366
>There never was a Super Gnat
Feels terrible man.
>>32857548
Blame Clinton for termination of
Oscar EW 5894 Phallus Lightweight Tactical Fighter Bomber (a.k.a Super Gnat) programme.
President Benson is the only one who's right all along. We dropped a nuke on Saddam and President Benson himself defeated that bastard in a lightsaber duel.
>>32857105
Thats almost enough for 5 hits.
>>32851135
Anyone got the video without captions?
>>32856824
Cyberpunk af
>>32857533
That's 9.12A.
>>32853971
Now what's the next step of your master plan?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUhQXibl-n4