Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: download.jpg (8KB, 202x249px) Image search:
[Google]
8KB, 202x249px
who in your opinion is the deadliest warrior, /k/? Assume that the best warriors from each pre-industrial society is teleported to a giant colluseum-like arena; they all proceed to face off against each other in duels. each duel has three rounds: in the first two rounds, each combatant squares off against the other in a recreation of their home environment (ex if a samurai and a hoplite faced off, one round would be on a feudal japanese battlefield and the other would be in greece). These duels are to the death. The environments are selected to favor the warrior whose home turf it is. The third round takes place in an empty arena. These warriors are all in top physical condition and equipped with the best weapons and armor ever produced by their society. The deadliest warrior shall therefore be defined as the guy with the greatest chance of beating every other faction there.
My money is on a european knights.
pic completely unrelated.
>>
>>32819124
Samurai are trained to knock a full plated swordsman on his ass without the use of their sword. It's all about the martial arts, weapons and armor are there for when those martial arts failed.
>>
A winged hussar, obviously.
>>
File: 1480096069541.png (393KB, 450x450px) Image search:
[Google]
393KB, 450x450px
>>32819153
> oh, lord
>>
>>32819153
>samurai try's to punch knight
>knight grabs him, throws him on the ground, beats the shit out of him with his gauntlets, then stabs him in the throat
>>
>>32819124
I'd put some money on an Apache Indian
>>
>>32819536
with or without gunpowder?
>>
bamp
>>
>>32819124
I'm going to have to go with either the Swiss Guard or the Gorkas. You don't fuck with hill-people.
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2