Surplus m9s

>>32811127
If they're dirt cheap everyone and their mom will buy one.

>>32811127
tossed into the pacific

They'll end up in the hands of ''''''''''''''moderate''''''''''''''' rebels.

Depends if trump is president when they start getting phased out, and has a republican house or senate.

Democrats and John McCain will want them destroyed.

Tossed into the mediterranean

File: 1485458997389.png (455KB, 935x651px) Image search: [Google]

455KB, 935x651px

The majority will be beat to shit and restoring alloy framed handguns isn't worth it.

Just buy a new brigadier 92 and be done with it.

>>32811161
CMP will mix n match parts to produce good guns

>>32811154
When does phasing out officialy begin?

>>32811176
last thursday

>implying Beretta doesn't have an agreement with the US Military not to sell their shit to the civilian market

Buy a PX4 and be done with it.

Should we write a letter to donald trumps son? Isnt he the head of some kinda gun rights thingy?

>>32811199
I rather carry my cz52, than a px4.

>>32811127

guaranteed they'll be given off to iraqi and afghan national forces

guaranteed

>>32811199
Dude it's really easy to buy an M9.

https://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/cPath/2084_21_52/products_id/23505/Beretta+J92M9A0+M9+Commerical+10%2B1+9mm+4.9%22

They'll be given to client states
Any that aren't will sit in a warehouse for 50 years, like the 1911s

Something will prevent them from being safe or suitable for civilian use.... just like HMMWV

>>32811217
Yeah but that's $550 and doesn't have the history that issued M9s have. People like guns that were actually carried by someone because it makes them more interesting. Not to mention that hundreds of thousands of M9s going on the market at once will drop the price to something crazy like $150-200 which is much more appealed.

>>32811127
As absolutely clownshoes as Trump's administration has proven to be, not only will we not get them, but they will wind up in an embarrassing place.

>>32811448
You are embarrassing yourself

File: Pepe98.gif (582KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

582KB, 500x375px

>>32811448

Don't you guys have some law making the sale of modern military weapons to civilians illegal?

Wouldn't they just meet a chop saw

It'd be great if they were to surplus them out. They'd have to be cheap, since no one would be willing to buy a beat to shit one when police and foreign surplus with less abuse are just like 350 bucks

>>32811127
Did only the Army adopt the sig 320, or is it across the military?

How will we know if such a thing would happen or not? Where would we look?

>>32811127
seriously?
But the m9 has a cast frame.
Get a 92S, they have milled frames which are superior.

>>32811670
I mean they aren't too modern and they'll literally be better taken care of in civilian hands than in the military

>t. Armory custodian

>>32811397
>history
>bunch of flunkies jacking off on a biscuit

File: angel made of knives with the face of donald trump.jpg (101KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1024x576px

when they have to scrap them, what should they make them into?

as much as I'd like them to CMP these babies, a few hundred thousand-millions of M9s hitting the market in below 92f condition made of mixed up parts and mismatched locking blocks isn't the best option.

best solution
>save all the pretty ones
>save any with wartime graffiti/trench art
>save any with special wartime provenance
>demill, or better yet just weld them together, into some kickass monument to war and american exceptionalism