so are there any actual ballistics disadvantages to bullpups

>>32780808
Imagine this
Is shitting better when your ass is long or short
This should answer your question

There are quite literally no disadvantages to bulpups. Anyone who says otherwise is just joking around.

>>32780815
Stop shilling
it takes longer time for mechanism to ignite the bullet, so it can be critical time sometimes. Imagine you shoot someone, and bullet only fires after few second
This is bulpup disadvantage which leads in death

>>32780815
>Armpit reload
>Trigger linkage
>What is ambidexterity

>>32780828
>Imagine you shoot someone, and bullet only fires after few second
>after few second
Holy hyperbole, Batman!

>>32780833
>Armpit reload
Not an issue, as most people can reload just as fast as say An AR or ASK.

>Trigger linkage
Not really an issue
Can easily be tuned for a better pull.

>What is ambidexterity
Something that's not an issue for most Bullpup guns.

File: delet.jpg (23KB, 480x479px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 480x479px

>>32780808
>>32780815
I'm left-handed and I find this offensive.

File: 9kTluTI.gif (2MB, 452x254px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 452x254px

>>32780842
>Just as easy to reload
Sitting at a bench on a range, or lying on your belly on the side of a ditch in an actual firefight?

>It can be tuned to be less shit!
Just because hours of work and tuning can make a bullpup trigger as good as an out of the box normal trigger doesn't mean it isn't an inherent flaw of the system.

>>32780828
>>32780833
>>32780853
Ahahaha! You are all very funny! I also like to say things that have no downsides to have downsides!

>>32780860
>inherent flaw
RFB disagrees. Placing the sear up by the trigger instead of back by the hammer fixes the trigger issue. Most bullpups are still using the traditional sear design that doesn't translate well to bullpup

>>32780836
Second is little too much, but I gave understandable example what would happen in real-life situation