are nuclear bombs really that scary? whats the next step down

>>32774161
how old are you?

nukes are a hoax

death kills millions of people every year globally

there is no cure for it and everyone is born with it, biggest cover up of our age

>>32774285
7 and 3 qorters

If you blow up three nukes at the same time the earth's crust cracks, that's why they only dropped two in japan

>>32774161
You have to be 18 to post here.

You can use any weapon you want, but be prepared for them to be used against you.

>>32774161
>are nuclear bombs really that scary?
yes.
>whats the next step down from a nuclear bomb and also should we really be scared of nukes when there are still weapons out there that can kill you
ordinary bombs and thermobaric weapons.
>also what's worse a chemical bio virus attack or a nuke attack
nuke attack.
>also are nukes and bio weapons legal to use ?
no.

>>32774733
A chemical/virus/bio attack is really scary if it's a disease that's not detected and it spreads on a big scale

>>32774161
Stop talking like a child.

>>32774285
old enough to be your dad

>>32774161

Next step up is weather control, which has already been banned because it only takes one fuckup to destroy life as we know it from its misuse.

>>32774777
then you nuke the area to stop the spread you silly goose

File: 1454474910433.jpg (4KB, 125x125px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 125x125px

>>32774955
>then you nuke the area to stop the spread you silly goose

Neutron bomb. Probably a miracle the thing hasn't gained in popularity yet and conventional thermobaric stuff is used instead. I think it's likely people will be more popular sentiment that it's better than building destroying bombs as politics homogenize in the next few decades

File: Blowpipe_missile_2.jpg (1MB, 2820x1900px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2820x1900px

viro/bio weapons are the spoopiest against civillians closely followed by chemical weapons

but they have a limited effect against military targets with NBC protection

Radiation means that farming becomes near impossible in a vast circumference to the blast, for decades or centuries ahead. If your country is nuked the shelters might save you from the blast, but what do you subside on afterwards?

>>32774161
>and also should we really be scared of nukes when there are still weapons out there that can kill you
This sentence gave me cancer.

>>32775474
but the military already fire bombs weats and animal enclosers so the enemy has nothing to eat they did it in ukraine and the desputed zone

also ithink it was in syria or libia they closed the dams so there were no water

>>32774777
>A chemical/virus/bio attack is really scary
No its not we had NBC threads discussing this in detali in the past.
Search the archives and you will find out how and why.

>>32775111
The destructive radius of a nuclear bomb is typically larger than the radius of fatal neutron dose. Additionally, things like concrete and steel are much better at stopping neutrons than one might think.

>>32774161
>are nuclear bombs really that scary?
slow death by radiation is probably one of the worst ways to go

>>32775615

Well, duh. But there is a difference between taking out the current crops and food stores, and destroying them for several generations ahead.