Best repro m1 carbine

>>32768875
Fulton Armory

>>32768889
>1500

I got a '43 inland for $800

>>32768908
He asked for the best *repro*, to be fair.

File: 1449945424584.png (17KB, 418x359px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 418x359px

>repro

>>32768875

Why get a repro made off all cast parts when you could buy a blue sky for $750 and throw a new criterion barrel on it for another $150 and have an all forged carbine with history for less than the repro

>>32768875
Auto Ordnance

Its true. Just get a USGI one for like $800. I inherited a Universal M1 from my grandpa right before he passed away. Its fun to shoot, accurate, but boy does it jam up about 3 or 4 times a mag. Would never get rid of it, but I just wished it worked properly

>>32772193

Did you check to see if your mag springs are installed correctly? I had the same problem with the new production magazines coming out of Korea. I flipped them right side up and now they function flawlessly.

>>32772193
Magazines result in the most problems for M1 Carbines.
Universal M1 Carbines, while not true reproductions, are generally the most reliable when using not-shit mags.

No, nobody knows why. They just are.

File: 15853246674.jpg (624KB, 1296x968px) Image search: [Google]

624KB, 1296x968px

>>32768875
I got the M1 carbine made by Inland MKS and here's the rundown:
>sights are metal, but only the rear sight is adjustable
>wood stock looks and feels great, but MKS is engraved in the wood on the buttstock
>receiver is cast and I've scratched it a few times very easily because it's cast
It's alright, but I wouldn't say it should be worth $1000.

File: SAM_0700.jpg (1009KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1009KB, 1920x1080px

unless you find a deal just buy an original.

>>32774403
>Universal
>Original

>>32774554
>imply that i was calling it original and not just sharing a pic of my carbine.