Optic Jerk Off Thread

>>32758631
How old is that advertisement? I see it has what looks like a picatinny rail attachment though I suppose it could be for the old weaver type rails.

I do agree though, I think that optic there has a definite retro cool factor to it.

>>32758658
It's an ad from a 1980 issue of American Rifleman, but their first model came out in 1975, and discontinued in '79. That's probably the G2 model, almost the same aesthetic imo

>>32758686
Bretty cool, never knew they had stuff like that back in the late 70's. Kinda want to build a CAR-15 clone and put one on it now lol.

File: IMG_2035.jpg (67KB, 799x325px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 799x325px

>>32758631
I kinda wanna put one on my HK91 when I finish paying for it. Are there any other cool retro optics that /k/ would recommend for that kind of rifle?

File: IMG_2034.jpg (173KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 640x1136px

>>32758786
For reference, that example is using the additional magnifier add-on.

File: IMG_9348.jpg (1MB, 2448x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2448x2448px

>>32758631
Speaking of weird optics, how about a Chink YMA-95-1? One of maybe a dozen ever exported, it's like a tiny autistic POSP. Quirky proprietary quick-release mount that holds zero, illuminated reticle, and I even have the original carry case, manual and factory QC papers.

>>32758821
Looks like air soft tier Chinese garbage
>potmetal.jpg

File: IMG_3946.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>32758840
Seems plenty rugged to me. Build quality is pretty damn good.
I'll likely never sell it, either. Chinese mil optics are just too rare, and it's a neato optic with some blatant Slav heritage.

>>32758821
>there are people who are into chink milsurp

I really should have known this was a thing but I'm still shocked by it.

>>32758873
I'm not, not really. I just like oddball guns and accessories. I had the Type 97 before, and I knew they had a proprietary optic, and with enough searching managed to find one. I figure why not have the optic that's designed to work with that particular gun?

>>32758923
How much was the gun and optic?

>>32759044
Gun was $1000, optic was nearly that.

>>32760294
Is there any magnification? The scope must be super snowflake because I can find barely any info on it with Google