Is this a practical plane?

File: precmet.jpg (890KB, 2400x1800px) Image search: [Google]

890KB, 2400x1800px

>>32727928
Mostly. It's basically a pusher with two props. Angle is a bit extreme, but anime and whatnot.

Backfiring into your propellers is not a good thing though.

No because it has...
FUCKING ROTORS

File: aero.jpg (100KB, 500x426px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 500x426px

>>32727981

File: 1444347873040.webm (3MB, 864x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 864x480px

>>32727928

>>32727928

Man, 80's and 90's animation was crisp as fuck

File: 1484790511421.jpg (256KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1920x1080px

>>32728267
meanwhile...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxGf6D1g97s

>>32727928
>>32728243

Whats this from?

>>32728418

Royal Space Force: Wings of Honneamise

Those webms are pretty much the only /k/ related stuff (combat) in the entire movie.

>>32728516
thanks anon

That's such a /k/ movie. Don't care if there isn't much combat.

>>32728516
>Those webms are pretty much the only /k/ related stuff (combat) in the entire movie.
you forgot the awkward scene where the main character tries to force himself on the equally awkward Christefag girl, or would that be /r9k/ ?

>>32727928
Mostly.

The propellers would interfere with one another and reduce thrust while the wings seem a bit small for something that size.

In short, not the best designed plane but it should actually fly. Probably.

>>32727981
God I loved working on the Merlin.
Nothing like what you feel when running that engine up.

>>32728267
When animation is on point, it's epic. Unfortunately, this is the exception rather than the rule as high quality like that is Expensive and needs top tier art directors so you usually end up with pretty crappy stuff up until the 2000s with CGI taking most of the load off.

>>32727928

the americans developed something like this but it never made it past the drawing board/prototype phases.