[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Riots. general

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 353
Thread images: 49

File: Go out and destroy america.jpg (120KB, 960x918px) Image search: [Google]
Go out and destroy america.jpg
120KB, 960x918px
General riot control stratagies, how to get out of one, how to fortify home/ business in order to not die. This shit is a little too close to home for me.
>>
>>32727363
Don't participate.
>>
File: Dust:Gas mask.jpg (2MB, 1969x1703px) Image search: [Google]
Dust:Gas mask.jpg
2MB, 1969x1703px
>>
>>32727363
>Blend in. Put up your hood or otherwise cover your face and move with the crowd while keeping your eyes open for an exit. The second you see an opening, you take it.

>Fortify. Arming yourself should be obvious. hole up in the innermost room you can get to and barricade yourself inside. if you can, construct multiple barricades. If possible, bring your fridge with you. you'll have your food supply as well as something heavy as fuck to put in front of the door.
>>
File: bootlick.jpg (9KB, 300x261px) Image search: [Google]
bootlick.jpg
9KB, 300x261px
>ITT
/k/ faps over the revolution until it's happening kek.
>>
Last year:
>take to the streets if they grab our guns
This year:
>oy vey all this hollaring is inturrupting my waifu time
>>
File: mike.gif (4MB, 448x280px) Image search: [Google]
mike.gif
4MB, 448x280px
>>32727576
>a guy I like is in charge now so the government is good
Sums up most retards in general.

>Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.
>>
>I like my ruler so now I need to know how to exit riots!

Fuck yourself statist
>>
>>32727552
>>32727576
>>32727606
>>32727643
pretty much this lmao
>>
File: IMG_2426.jpg (119KB, 800x653px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2426.jpg
119KB, 800x653px
>>
>>32727646
>People have preferences in their government political ties and biases
Oh look, how unsurprising
>>
File: wooden-house-fire-6839314.jpg (101KB, 798x900px) Image search: [Google]
wooden-house-fire-6839314.jpg
101KB, 798x900px
>>32727363
>fortify home
>made of wood
There's no such thing, Brad. Enjoy Jamal, Pedro and Lquashani burning it down with your family inside.
>>
>>32727606
>>32727643
Sorry, you need a Gold Subscription Shitposting Licenseā„¢ to post in this thread.
>>
>>32727576
>implying taking away a constitutional right is equal to "I don't agree with a person in power so I'm going to throw an excessively violent tantrum"
>>
File: IMG_0719.jpg (10KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0719.jpg
10KB, 480x360px
>>
File: 1478635628614.gif (1MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]
1478635628614.gif
1MB, 320x240px
>>32727652
>>32727662
>right-wing dipshits spend 8 years shitposting about violently overthrowing Obama's "leftist regime" on places like /k/
>left-wing actually goes out and fucks shit up
Tell me again about how the left are hand-wringing cowards
>>
>>32727794
>"fucking shit up"

Y'all even riot like lefties, too. Fucking poofters.
>>
>>32727794
Breaking windows of a Starbucks.
Spraypainting cars.
Setting trashcan fires.
All because it will accomplish... ???


Yeah, that's really fuckin' shit up. Gosh, how will "the man" ever recover after these episodes of violent Bolshevism?
>>
>>32727867
>starbucks opposes trump
>Trump protesters attack starbucks

Truly our greatest ally
>>
File: lol.jpg (89KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]
lol.jpg
89KB, 960x720px
>>32727794
>right wing is upset
>gains control of every major branch of government in the next major election cycle

>left wing is upset
>randomly harasses people, smashes windows of businesses that supported their preferred candidate and blocks people from commuting via bus or metro rail
>>
Honestly though if the left started to rebel and there was a 2nd civil war, would you guys not rebel? Our system is very fucked up and honestly if a rebellion started I would join. I may not agree with there ideas, but I know the government is fucked up and we the people need to end it
>>
>>32727936
>If the left started to rebel
They wouldn't be able to muster an effective rebellion, given that they are over-reliant on the state, and do not believe that personal protection or defense is the responsibility of the individual.

Their "rebellion" would pretty much start and end as it has now. Angry fire-starting, a few arrests, nothing accomplished aside from expressing displeasure, and back to business as usual.
>>
Shoot rioters until there isn't a riot.
>>
>>32727363
Inna woods is a good choice if you don't have anything worth defending.
Korean roof defense is good if the area is lawless and you have family/friends.

In general most people, even rioters aren't suicidal.
>>
>>32727936
ITS THOSE MOTHERFUCKERS WHO FUCKED THE SYSTEM UP

Why should we associate with those who want to violate our rights.
>>
>>32727936

Anything they could do to replace it would be worse for everyone so no.
>>
>>32727936
>Joining a socialist revolution

Enjoy the gulag when you try to keep your rifle once the revolution succeeds.
>>
>>32727652

To be fair, Bank of America can eat a dick.
>>
File: eac.png (185KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]
eac.png
185KB, 480x360px
>>32727646
I'm only upset because all these fucks are out memeing in the streets instead of volunteering at homeless shelters or working for non-profits to help the people that they think Trump is going to put into concentration camps. But then I remember that these people don't actually want to work for anything and just want the government to do it for them.
>>
>>32728073
I dunno, that online banking is godly.
Interest rates could be better though...
>>
>>32728073
They are but people should be encouraging and participating in boycotts instead of breaking windows.
>>
>>32727936

You know who the first people to get purged by the Bosheviks were?

Any violent revolution is going to eliminate the violent revolutionaries who made it happen so that they don't start another violent revolution.
>>
>>32727936
>overthrow government
>"Okay guys so since we are finished her le-"
>killed because you don't believe in their left-wing communist ideology
>>
>>32727760
this guy get's it
>>
>>32727991
>t.everyone who doesn't support trump hates guns
I can tell you right now that's false
>>32728009
Who has more power us or them. If the left ask for shit we tell them no it won't work.
>>32728052
>socialist
A revolution is a revolution. Once it's over the change in policy will determine the kind of revolution, and if you think that it will end in socialism I you make me sick
>>
>>32728120
Boycotts don't do shit because in the end people will go back to it. You know how many people boycotted Starbucks for supporting Israel? Millions. You know what that did? Jack shit.
>>
>>32728150
>the left wing starts a revolution and wins a second civil war
>IT'S OKAY GUYS THE ONLY PART OF THE LEFT WING RADICAL ENOUGH TO SPARK CIVIL WAR DOESN'T SUPPORT SOCIALISM AND GOMMUNISM
You're delusional.
>>
>>32728123
>>32728130
How can they Lil us, when we have the power. They may have strategies but without an actual force they can't do shit. Look at the American revolution. Did any of those guys get fucked?
>>
>>32728102
dude its death by fees. if youre a BofA customer, its obvious to anyone else that you dont know how to handle money.
>>
>>32728174
Haven't you ever heard of a hijacked revolution. The left wing could start it and we could finish it
>>
>>32727936
That happened in the commonwealth. Guess how well it went?
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rican_Nationalist_Party_revolts_of_the_1950s
>>
>>32728150
>A revolution started by socialists won't be a socialist revolution
>The useful idiots won't be purged once the socialists are in power

Sounds like you are in needing of re-education, comrade.
>>
>>32727701
It is fucking shameful that it took a fucking tripfag to say this.

We talk about a revolution because we fear an encroaching government coming to take our last defense against tyranny and violate the constitution. They are rioting because they disagree with someone, basically. I could write it out or give them quarter and say "well they're scared of encroaching racism or taking rights from women" or however they excuse it, but the fact of the matter is he isn't actually Hitler and he really hasn't done anything yet.

They're rioting and burning shit down over things that haven't happened yet if they ever will. We talked about something theoretically if something theoretically happened. That's the difference.
>>
>>32727936
Fuck no, lets say their was a successful revolution, some kike like George Soros would immediately swoop in and install a puppet government
>>
>>32727363
>This shit is a little too close to home for me.

If you don't live in Oakland, DC or Furgeson, you're full of shit.
>>
>>32728201

That would make you a counter-revolutionary anyway.

Also who's "we", the people who would gain the most traction wouldnt be gun loving libertarians but fundie puritan-evangelist wackjobs or lazy trashy /pol/tard white niggers.
>>
>>32728336
He'd probably be the one leading the revolution in the first place whether it would seem like it or not
>>
>>32728453
You mean funding it.
>>
>>32728185
The only way I could think of that it's "death by fees" is if you're poor. Keep minimum balances and I think you pay something on the order of $7?

If you're at risk for overdrafts, you should be dealing with a credit onion, not a bank, as they do not charge as much when you misspend.
>>
>>32728237
They talk of Trump as one to put people in camps, while praising Castro, who actually did.

Like, make up your minds... do you want people in camps or not?
>>
>>32728150
>If the left ask for shit we tell them no it won't work.

Because that's so effective now?
>>
>>32727794
>>left-wing actually goes out and fucks shit up

Breaking the windows of a Starbucks and setting some trash cans on fire isn't really "fuck(ing) shit up".

Oh and punching Trump faggots in the face who are putting out said fires. That's not a very good look either.

But I don't expect some limp-wristed weekend warrior anarchist to understand that sucker punching someone on tv when they are putting out fires isn't a good look.

And for fucks sake if you're going to take to the streets and start punching neo Nazis like Spencer in the face, take a couple of boxing lessons. Don't punch someone on TV if you hit like a drunk toddler.
>>
>>32727363
let those parasites rampage. It's police business to take care of them and you have nothing to worry when the police is on your side. The mass will start to hate on them soon enough and the right wins.
>>
>>32728336
This is the only issue I can see with a revolution. The only revolution we need a revolution against the elite
>>
File: 1484682047368.gif (883KB, 450x337px) Image search: [Google]
1484682047368.gif
883KB, 450x337px
I don't condone the riots, but if rioters could go ahead and destroy LA harder than they did in 1992, I wouldn't mind.

I'd watch from a lawn chair with a cooler full of beer.
>>
>>32727794
>Tell me again about how the left are hand-wringing cowards

>funded by a billionaire kike
>supported by the kike media
>supported by kikewood
>final tally:a burned limo, a couple overturned trash cans, an alt-right LARPer punched in the face by a literal shit eating cuck, and Trump is still president.

I can't take all of this winning.
>>
File: 1484838663085.jpg (114KB, 750x592px) Image search: [Google]
1484838663085.jpg
114KB, 750x592px
The things Trump said he supports that made these people hate him have been said countless times by multiple politicians, including Clinton.
>>
>>32727552
Trump was my revolution anon!

These riots are just libs chimping out over not getting their way.

Remember all the conservative riots after obama won? Of course not!
Cause we don't act like that!
>>
>>32729476

I love watching unarmed noguns Californie numale hipster leftists getting culturaly enriched and diversified by their plantation slaves they keep controlled with table scraps, crumbs and free gibs Obama phones.
>>
>>32727936

If civil war breaks out in the US, these leftists woudn't stand a chance. In order for a guerilla army to win it needs the peoples support.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_Civil_War

Here is an example of what would happen should it come to this. The Commies in greece attacked everyday people, thus people supported the US and UK backed government of greece because they were the lesser of two evils.

Despite what the MSM wants you to think, these antifa faggots do not have the support of the people. Most people who see through their bullshit are children of the cold war, so they are well aware of the dangers and failures of communism.

Most of my generation didn't grow up with the cold war, so they are ignorant of the fallicies of leftism as a whole. Public schools didn't help in this regard. And yes there are people my age who do understand this, i know.

One thing to remember is that these people are cowards. Just kids having a collective temper tantrum because they didn't get what they want. It's the people funding this nonsense that you should be concerned with. Don't let this worry you to much, but keep your powder dry anyway.
>>
>>32729527
We live in one of the most politically volatile environments in decades, shit if Hillary was president there would definitely be mass protests.
>>
File: 1.gif (999KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]
1.gif
999KB, 500x275px
>>32727552

Is it happening yet?

I just want to finally use all of this metric fuckton of gear I have been buying all these years.

I would go fight with 3 rifles, a shotgun and 2 handguns.
>>
>>32729541
>the peoples support.

Trump has the lowest approval ratings of any new president and did not win the popular vote, I don't support the protesters, but I do recognize what could likely become a bigger issue.
>>
>>32727794
>right-wing dipshits spend 8 years shitposting about violently overthrowing Obama's "leftist regime" on places like /k/
>left-wing actually goes out and fucks shit up

Because a fair majority of conservatives know the difference between rioting because waaaaah my side lost and oh shit the interment camps are up.

1/10 troll attempt for getting me to respond.
>>
>>32727794
>Smashing up local businesses =/= revolution.

That this need to be stated truly reveals this anons extraordinary stupidity.
>>
>>32729585
They can protest to their hearts content!

It's when the start fucking up the city that they show what assholes they are.
>>
File: 1485041995137.gif (2MB, 320x175px) Image search: [Google]
1485041995137.gif
2MB, 320x175px
>>32727794

Good
Night
Cuck
Side
>>
>>32729702

Free the garbage from the tyranny and oppression those fascist cans!

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>>32728896
Yet you're calling it like these are full blown riots
>>
>>32729585
>lowest approval ratings
oh like the polls that said he was going to lose

>did not win the popular vote
irrelevant, but illegal immigrants voting and door to door ballot collection is bullshit. the popular vote was a toss-up
>>
>>32729710
>Free the garbage
But the anitfa fags are already free
>>
>>32729720
that's because it is retard, learn american btw
>>
>>32727794
Simple, they don't go near cities that allow guns.
>>
>>32729565
Made me think of this lol

https://youtu.be/zhe58xORWG0
>>
>>32729730

Opinion polls and election forecast projections are very different, one is just a poll while the other is a combination of media reports, polled test groups, and mathematical modeling.
>>
>>32729746
>2 cars and 2 windows destroyed
oh noes
this was by people unironically waving AnCom flags. their feckless rage is irrelevant. they'd be doing the same thing if Hillary won
>>
The only right answer
>roof koreans
>>
>>32729822
Oh, so it is just a different flavor of bullshit.
>>
>>32729822
The opinion poll where they claim Obama has a 60% approval rate has a sample of 1000 people.

1000 people.
>>
>>32729822
the only approval ratings I'm seeing are coming from media outlet polls and are in conflict with Pew's finding back in Nov
>>
>>32729837
Did they do this when Obama won?
>>
>>32729914
>what is inferential statistics

If you look at the fine print, it'll tell you the probability of the poll being wrong.

It's usually like a 99% chance that the population mean is within a percentage point or two of the sample mean.
>>
>>32729925
The fuck?

So you are telling 1000 people's opinion represent millions of people?

This is why democracy is shit.
>>
File: 1480203598432.jpg (9KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]
1480203598432.jpg
9KB, 251x242px
>>32727794

You broke a starbucks window and set some trash cans on fire. Way to go fucking faggot.
>>
>>32729940
This is also how they tested the keyboard you're using to type your posts. Do you think QA tests every single keyboard? They randomly sample that shit and estimate the population mean based on the sample mean.

If you take a random sample from a population, you can calculate the odds that the population mean falls within a specific range.

For 1,000 people, you can get a 95% or 99% chance that the actual national opinion is within a range of a few percentage points.

You'd known this if you'd taken a statistics class.
>>
>>32729974
And that's why I know polls are bullshit.

You simply cannot test 1000 people and say 95% or 99% chance that 1000 people's opinion represent the majority.
>>
>>32729987
It's one of those things that seems wrong, but isn't.

For the same reason that if you flip a coin once, you have no idea if you're going to get heads, but if you flip a coin 50 times, you're pretty sure you're going to get heads. In fact, as long as you know the coin isn't weighted, you can precisely estimate the odds of not getting a single heads to be 1 / (2^50). As each random variation is added, the change of the group being different from the population falls. By the time you reach a thousand, you're getting about as good numbers as if you did everyone.

Again, it's not just the government that does this. Every major company on the planet uses simple random sampling and inferential statistics to keep tabs on large numbers of items.
>>
>>32729987

>I don't trust the devil's math!

Bayesian statistics won WW2, what have you done with your life?

>>32730029 You're doing God's work anon.
>>
>>32727652
1) Anarchists aren't liberals
2) I live in DC, the Anarchists do this every inauguration.
>>
>>32727794
They are beating trash cans.
>the revolution will not be televised
>>
>>32727760
are those barrel bombs?

kek
>>
>>32730029
No, it's wrong and it has been proven wrong, they did the same shit with the pre-election pollings and look where they get.

>Again, it's not just the government that does this. Every major company on the planet uses simple random sampling and inferential statistics to keep tabs on large numbers of items.
And that's a good reason to not trust any government or company ever, and you have to test your own shit and demand refund if they are lemons.
>>32730044
I'm living it.
>>
>>32730052
Did anarchists do this in Obama's?

Where's the video?
>>
File: Anarcho spotted.jpg (33KB, 540x304px) Image search: [Google]
Anarcho spotted.jpg
33KB, 540x304px
>>32727643
>>
File: kebab has been removed.png (1MB, 680x567px) Image search: [Google]
kebab has been removed.png
1MB, 680x567px
>tfw live near Portland and see half decent protests get turned into fucking riots from anarchists and lack of leadership during the protest

can we just start shooting anarchists? they do nothing but break shit and ruin good things.
>>
>>32730105
See, an election forecast has a lot of moving parts that an opinion poll simply doesn't.

With an opinion poll, you're just asking a random group of people the same question every couple months and seeing what proportion responds with which answer.

Most election forecasts are going to depend on algorithms and more complicated, fallible forms of math.

Incidentally, if you can prove simple random sampling wrong, you could probably make yourself a billionaire on the commodities market or industrial engineering.
>>
>>32730161
Pre-election polls do the same shit, they just poll within a group of people.

>Incidentally, if you can prove simple random sampling wrong, you could probably make yourself a billionaire on the commodities market or industrial engineering.
The recent Samsung Note 7 scandal?
>>
>>32729974
>>32730029
blah blah blah math math math

I get that bit, but you can corrupt a poll just like you can corrupt a jury, people aren't keyboards as much as you'd like to pretend they are.
>>
>>32730215
>polls show something I don't like
>polls now corrupt
>I don't need proof, pew is in on the NWO conspiracy

ess emm aytch
>>
>>32729924
https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2009/racist-backlash-greets-president-barack-obama
>>
>>32727404
What if they set fire to the building you're in?
>>
>>32730243
Jesus, look at that narrative when they favor the president.

Also, that doesn't mention anarchists.
>>
File: ArEUp.jpg (59KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]
ArEUp.jpg
59KB, 500x333px
>>32727363
You go on your roof with your rifle and you shoot anyone that tries to get past your wall of shopping carts.
>>
File: az-poll-by-party.jpg (25KB, 473x231px) Image search: [Google]
az-poll-by-party.jpg
25KB, 473x231px
>>32730235
It's true though, you can fuck up a poll of a thousand people by being selective.

Nice retort though.
>>
>>32730215
If you trust that shit, you are a moron.

There's no fucking way a sample of 1000 people can represent millions of people, this is the way democracy tricks you to believe that it has the majority's interest at heart, by taking a minority's opinion and mask it under a poll.
>>
>>32730284
>I don't need to prove my assertion
>>
>>32730262
No, you're right, it doesn't mention anarchists. It mentions apprentice non anarchist regular ass racist white people. Children, adults of both genders. I don't agree with any of these violent "protestors" but to say nothing like this happened for Obama is ridiculous. On top of that you have more people worried and upset now over things that have nothing at all to do when race. Millions of people are afraid they will lose their health insurance. That may seem like nothing to you but that is life and death to them.
>>
>>32730294
A 1000 people poll representing over hundred millions of people?

Prove that first.
>>
>>32730287
I'm advocating that the sample is not representative pal.

>>32730294
Just did.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/media-corruption-hillary-5-points-az-poll-interviewed-nearly-twice-many-democrats-republicans/
>>
>>32730287
>t. never taken a statistics class before
>>
>>32730309
Apparently* not apprentice
>>
>>32730309
You said anarchists do this every inauguration.

Where is the proof of that?
>>
>>32730314
I'm glad I'm not dumb enough to take in that class.
>>
>>32730330
I didn't. Different anon. I jumped into the discussion. My bad about the anarchist. My point is purple saying this didn't happen when Obama was elected.
>>
>>32730116
I've got nothing from 2009, but in 2001 some of the fuckers in a tree with a home made flamethrower almost made me miss the procession, the riot cops had four blocks blocked off. You don't here about it a lot because the DC cops are probably the best in the world at handling a protest. They don't incite, the contain, let it burn out, and then arrest some fuckers.
>>
>>32730344

Dude are you kidding me? Statistics is what lets us build all the shit you callously enjoy

>>32730311
The sample is biased, but there are methods for normalizing based on the sample you do take. In this case, you would be less certain about how the less-sampled group feels overall.

Again, the polls were "wrong" in that they predicted the wrong candidate's victory, but the actual outcome is within the error margin of the polls. This is what makes it "statistical" - it's not guaranteed to be completely correct, just arbitrarily close depending on methods and assumptions.
>>
>>32730367
It didn't happen under Obama, there's no fucking anarchists protesting in D.C. against Obama.

Why? Because they are all leftist scums.
>>
>>32730367
People not purple damn it.
>>
>>32730372
Of course because 2001 was Bush's time.

You know anarchists hate right-wingers and repubs right?
>>
File: poll12.jpg (52KB, 780x439px) Image search: [Google]
poll12.jpg
52KB, 780x439px
>>32730378
>sample is biased
Uh, yeah, that's what I'm getting at. You can't bias fucking keyboard QC like this.

And the margins weren't close.
>>
>>32730378
No, it's people who build that shit.

Statistics like this are just lies.
>>
>>32730385
There were no violent attacks or outbursts when Obama was elected?

Maybe not on the scale of the last day or two, but certain people were damn near foaming at the mouth. Effigies and signs of Obama hanging etc.

So I guess it just comes down to these libcucks are out there doing what, racist pussies were too scared to do.
>>
>>32730287
>There's no fucking way a sample of 1000 people can represent millions of people,

>I don't understand how fucking statistics work
>>
>>32730311
Okay, you've shown me that polls executed properly.

Can you show that the polls we were talking about weren't executed properly?
>>
>>32730425
Yes, they weren't any anarchists outburst in D.C. against Obama.

>So I guess it just comes down to these libcucks are out there doing what, racist pussies were too scared to do.
Yeah, anon, racist pussies respect properties a little all too much to go smashing trash cans.
>>
>>32730425
>violent attacks or outbursts
>destroying property and littering
too civilized to do*
>>
>>32730413
>Everything that disagrees with me are lies/fake news
>Everything that agrees with me is gospel and truth

Holy fuck you are stupid.
>>
>>32729974
>This is also how they tested the keyboard you're using to type your posts. Do you think QA tests every single keyboard?

Former QA here. Quality tests rates vary by company and product. The product I worked on had a 100% cosmetic check, and a 2% full check.

For statistics, using less than 1% as a sample size is retarded.
>>
File: friends_with_colored_people.jpg (125KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
friends_with_colored_people.jpg
125KB, 1280x720px
>>32727404
Or..I know this is gonna blow your mind...or you could not live in a area comprised of individuals of enhanced melanin.
>>
>>32730430
Hey, with the way statistics work, don't need to sample 1000 people, just need to sample me.

That's statistic enough.
>>
>>32730330
>>32730116
Ok, I found an Anarchist site lamenting that they didn't do more in 2009, so I suppose you are right, they gave that year a miss. Warning, they do make smashing some shit sound fun. https://itsgoingdown.org/whoever-vote-ungovernable-history-anarchist-counter-inaugural-protest/
>>
>>32730455
Any people who say they can sample 1000 people and say these 1000 people represent the opinion of millions of people are not to be trusted.

Liars and thieves or deluded idiots, all of them.
>>
>>32730434
Prove that it's executed properly first.

Prove it even surveys the majority of the population.
>>
>>32730483
>>32730504
Can you even do x - 2 = 4 level math?
>>
>>32730511
Can you?
>>
>>32730517
x - 2 = 4

x = 6
>>
File: Capture.jpg (12KB, 392x110px) Image search: [Google]
Capture.jpg
12KB, 392x110px
>>32730483
Or they understand how fucking statistics work?

The math isn't even that complicated.
>>
>>32728150
>I can tell you right now that's false
>wanted the extreme antigun to win
>>
>>32730557
Hey, by that statistics, no need to ask 1000 people, just need to ask me.

The math would still be right.
>>
>>32730583
Well, you'd get an error margin of like +-100%
>>
>>32730614
And? It's just 3 more zeros compared to 1000 people.

Who gives a shit.
>>
>>32730407
>poll from June

Look at the pre-election day stuff. FiveThirtyEight had been showing Clinton's polls in Trump's margin for weeks prior, and Nate Silver acknowledged that there could be systemic bias in the polls. The result wasn't surprising to anyone with cursory knowledge of how polling works.

>b b b muh MSM mythos
If you're not willing to learn the skills to critique the statistics you hear, you'll be a sheep forever, no matter who is in power.
>>
>>32730619
Well, it's the difference between.

"we have a 95% confidence that between 0% and 100% of the US population approves of Donald Trump"

or

"we have a 95% confidence that between 38% and 42% of the US population approves of Donald Trump"

Both of these expressions are mathematically correct, it's just that we already knew the first one.
>>
>>32730465
This. The time for white flight was 10 years ago. Cityshits are stupid and deserve what they get.
>>
>>32730650
>homicide rates lower than they were a generation ago
>>
File: Nate Siilver.jpg (325KB, 690x2622px) Image search: [Google]
Nate Siilver.jpg
325KB, 690x2622px
>>32730645
The result was surprising to Nate himself, funnily enough.

It reinforces the point that anyone who trusts poll is a fucking moron.
>>
>>32730583
Nooo that math says that a larger sample size is better, for example:

I sample 100 people and find that Whoever's support it at 50%, that gives me a standard error of 5%, so I'm saying that Whoever is somewhere between 45% and 55%.

If I find the same results with a sample size of 1000 people, then that gives a standard error of 1.6%, so Whoever is between 48.4% and 51.6%
>>
>>32730647
See, this is how democracy lies to people.
>>
>>32730760
No, that math only says what you want it to say, by inputting the number of sample.
>>
>>32730754
>Nate Bronze
>>
>>32729585
Hillary had dead people and illlegal aliens drive up the popular vote, not that it matters anyway. And where did you see these approval ratings?
>>
File: 1457546366979.png (339KB, 460x454px) Image search: [Google]
1457546366979.png
339KB, 460x454px
>>32727643
>>
>>32730841
>Hillary had dead people and illlegal aliens drive up the popular vote

I trust that you have some evidence to support such an allegation.
>>
>>32729763
Yeah, nope, can confirm that there is a very active antifa in Richmond VA
>>
>>32730754
>only citing articles up to March 2016
He's been vocal in reasons why polling was "off," and the popular vote polls were accurate nation-wide. That isn't how American elections work, but that's not the poll's fault.
>>
I'm ambivalent about Trump, but all these protests are making me want to buy a MAGA hat.
>>
>>32730888
>VCU nigger commies

Goddamnit
>>
>>32729974
>Hillary had a 95% chance of victory!
I'm aware of and have taken stats before, but even though the mathematical and statistical base behind polling is solid polls themselves are not.
>>
>>32727363
Poor Mirage will never get to be an Evo V clone :^(
>>
>>32730884

Not the guy you replied to but haven't you heard of Project Veritas?
>>
>>32730967
O'Keefe is a faggot with zero credibility. Almost everyone agrees; not just libshits.
>>
>>32730997

That's not an argument, buddy.
>>
Okay, you faggots.

I was in the clankening in Kiev. I got you on this.

First: even in a situation of maximum clank, there are only going to be a couple of blocks actually affected by it. Maybe sex to ten square city blocks, and that's if there's an actual armed insurrection in your lovely hometown. Since I highly doubt that's going to happen, stop being a faggot, stock up on shit that disappears from supermarkets within 2 days, and watch it on TV.

If you are in the zone of maximum clank, then try the following:

Get the fuck out. Stay with friends for a couple of days. Either your shit is going to be commandeered by one or more sides (in which case even your tricked out AR festooned with dragon dildos isn't going to help) or your building is going to burn down. Either way, your shit is fucked. Take everything you can't possibly part with and GTFO to friends' houses, hotels, whatever. Be circumspect, walk in the streets only in broad daylight, don't try to be a fucking hero.

If you can't run, join whatever side you think is going to win, regardless of your personal opinions. Dying for an ideal is sexy and all, but you're dead afterwards so take it with a grain of salt.

Be well.
>>
>>32730899
Yeah, so vocal.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/donald-trump-has-a-20-percent-chance-of-becoming-president/
>>
There was no need to riot after Obama became president because he wasn't a fucking monster of a human being. He wasn't calling to put people of a non dominant faith on a "registry", or threatening to start up the nuclear arms race again. I understand most of /k/ is a bunch of wannabe tough guys who secretly wish they were in the SS killing kikes, but please don't tell me that you're so oblivious that you can't understand why a majority of the population hates and fears Trump.
>>
>>32731009
Thanks, Ukraine bro
How are things going over there?
>>
>>32731006
While not an argument in itself and though it does not totally discredit the person attacking the credibility of someone and their "evidence" is perfectly reasonable and O'Keefe definitely has poor credibility.
>>
>>32731029
The night before the election, he gave Hillary a 58% chance and said there might be polling errors.

I spent like the entire election night on 538
>>
>>32728123
>>32728130
Correct. There is always a night of the Long Knives.
>>
>>32731031
Obama had a registry of Muslims which he only destroyed in the last days of his rule in order to spite Trump.

Hillary threatened "...to respond to Russia's cyber aggression with military force" and to use whatever means are necessary to destroy Assad. Trump is clearly not the warmongerer.
>>
>>32731037
I've moved back to the states since then. I lived in Ukraine for four years. Shit is kind of fucked over there, war is going on.
>>
>>32731061
There are different kinds of monsters, war mongerers are one of many.
>>
>>32729974
If you took a stats class you'd be well aware that polls are only truly representative of the population that's being polled.
>>
>>32731116
Yeah, ok.
>>
>>32731031
>He wasn't calling to put people of a non dominant faith on a "registry"
Yeah this is a shitty thing to consider, but I don't care as long as it's restricted to non-citizens.

>start up the nuclear arms race again
His answer to hypothetical Russian military aggression towards the US was "if they want an arms race then I'll give them one"

>don't tell me that you're so oblivious that you can't understand why a majority of the population hates and fears Trump.
They're scared of him because the people on TV told them to be. It's the only explanation for why homosexuals, women, and blacks think that Trump is going to put them in USAuschwitz because he's never stated anything even remotely like that at any point during his campaign and the fact that neo-Nazis voted for him is irrelevant unless you want to argue that far-right US citizens don't deserve the right to vote. Even Snopes found that the shit about Pence wanting to electrocute fags wasn't real. At least wait until he sends you to concentration camps before you burn down your neighborhoods.

6/10 got me to reply seriously
>>
>>32731127
Hence why I said random sampling.
>>
>>32731171
I doubt many polls are capable of, or interested in, performing "truly random" samplings.
>>
>>32731047
He only retracts it because he knows his ass is fucking wrong.
>>
>>32731009
>Max clank
>>
>>32731208
Okay, but if you believe that, it's customary to provide evidence to support your position.

I have no loyalties really, I just don't think the polls today are fucked in a way they wouldn't have also been ten years ago.
>>
>>32731053
fuck off tripfag
>>
File: Freikorps.jpg (447KB, 1757x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Freikorps.jpg
447KB, 1757x1080px
>>32727363
There is only one solution to this retardedness.

A final solution.
>>
>>32731043

>I have no argument
>But what I said still counts!

Nope.
>>
>>32731236
I was there on election night though.

He said there was a 58% chance Hillary would win the electoral college, and that he expected modelling to be less reliable than normal because of the demographic changes among the different factions.

As it turns out, he was right about Trump losing the popular vote.
>>
>>32731141
>At least wait until he sends you to concentration camps before you burn down your neighborhoods.

Oh yeah, because if there's anything I learned from the holocaust it was to patiently wait for my oppressors to start killing off people. That really worked out well for the jews of europe.

People are afraid of him and his supporters because of places like 4chan. It shows you all you need to know about his supporters. How far do you have to go in /pol/ til you find anons frothing at the mouth about how much they want to gas kikes and lynch niggers? Shit, /k/ gets its crusty panties in a twist over even the hint of gun control, but you expect us to just roll over for you wannabe nazis talking about setting up death camps? Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit.
>>
>>32731275
>not rioting is "rolling over"

Have you tried registering voters or handing out pamphlets?

Because I can't help but notice that when the Tea Party got angry, they got a lot of shit done.
>>
>>32731288
Oh you better believe we're organizing. You think the Tea Party was effective? You got no idea how hard the left is going to hit back at the GOP over this.

Today's protest was just the beginning.
>>
>>32731314
>liberals
>organizing
>ever

t. lifelong Democrat
>>
File: IMG_2431.png (12KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2431.png
12KB, 420x420px
>>32731275
Leave while you have a chance
>>
>>32729543
This.

I am involved in Leftist groups and we had plans for mass actions regardless. Just were to be adjusted depending on HRC or DJT
>>
>>32731274
It was on election night that the real result starts coming in, and Nate and his crew start making excuses for how wrong they were.
>>
>>32731275

>People are afraid of him and his supporters because of places like 4chan.
No, they're afraid of him because of a constant stream of disinfo from the msm.
And they riot because they were brought up in a way that severely stunted their critical thinking skills, and ability to control their emotions.
>>
>>32731275
>LITERALLY HITLER
2/10 nigga u slippin
>>
>>32731331
What are you gonna do? call me mean names? post edgy memes? Gimme your worst anon.
>>
>>32731333
Where were the anarchists against Hillary back when she won the primary?
>>
>>32729476
hey when that starts can we make a thread?
ill bring beer, what kind of beer do you guys like?
can we get someone to coordinate with chairs?

how legit would it be to get some sofas on a hill top with some binoculars and beer to watch L.A. riots 2 electric boogaloo?
>>
>>32731335
No, I mean before the polls started, that was what his website said.

That Hillary had a 60-something chance of winning the popular vote and a 58 or 59 percent chance of winning the electoral college.

I think Nate Silver was actually one of the more accurate forecasters, most places were giving Karl-Rove-with-a-vagina 80% odds.
>>
>>32731346
We are going to meme your doom.
>>
>>32731275
I'm just saying: if your intention is to violently overthrow a legally elected President because he "might" be Hitler before he shows any indication of Hitlering then you're going to end up setting the Reichstag on fire and you may not like the result.
>>
>>32731370
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-fivethirtyeight-gave-trump-a-better-chance-than-almost-anyone-else/

They were even bawling their eyes to correct their mistakes in the last minute.

>I think Nate Silver was actually one of the more accurate forecasters, most places were giving Karl-Rove-with-a-vagina 80% odds.
Not even close, the rahmussen polls was showing Trump winning, like he should be.
>>
>>32727794
they smashed some windows and threw shit around.

it will take the city like a couple days to clean up the temper tantrum and then it will be like it never happened.

if the "right wing" had a little anarchy riot, there would be bodies, burning cars, collapsed buildings, ect.

you woefully underestimate what a true revolution is.

5/10 jimmies felt a breeze.
>>
>>32727363
Im working IN the riots in Portland as a Security Officer. Its pretty shit here too, but not really.

Our stratagy is to not let anyone withput an animal in ( since we're an animal hospital) and shoot anyone eith a molotov. Portland Police have said theyre not arresting anyone, even after violence occurs, so we're not taking chances.

>only 4 entrances
>multiple windows
>only 1 on duty because management is avtually autistic i think
>only option for less-than-lethal is my fists
>i aint fisting some cunts tonight
>all tge doors are locked and have minimal glass
>except the front doors. Theyre completely glass
>im pretty much fucked tonight

Help me, bros. The anarchists are only burning flags right now, but will they grow more violent? Last time they destroyed buildings and cars...i cant call in either, i did that last night
>>
>>32731275
Are you people still getting paid?
>>
>>32727643
>>32727576
>>32727552
>>32727606
>Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.


Yep. This
>>32727879
Eh, Most of the Rioters are Anti-Capitalist, and Starbucks is one of the most known symbols of American Capitalism.

>>32731323
Eh, other than the Womans March today, they were not liberals. They were mostly Socialist, Anarchist or Communist
>>
>>32731405
These anarchists are liberal hipster kids, they wouldn't do shit.
>>
>>32731358
Here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lANQV_5ZvYk
>>
>>32731405
>shoot anyone eith a molotov.
Sounds good to me... but what's the statute that says you can do so? Can you do things to defend property as a security guard that the rest of us can't...?

>Portland Police have said theyre not arresting anyone, even after violence occurs
How the hell can they justify this? Either from a policy or a legal standpoint? What are the trying to do -- ENCOURAGE people to riot and break shit?
>>
>>32731417
>Eh, other than the Womans March today, they were not liberals. They were mostly Socialist, Anarchist or Communist
What's the difference?

They are all leftists.
>>
>>32731346
Trump is literally Hitler
remember
>>
>>32731406

Actual paid shill here.
About half of us were laid off, but there's still a lot of us out here.
I'm not the one who posted that though.
I usually just copy/paste some shit, then go shitpost in /arg/ or something, since my boss never actually checks what I post.
>>
>>32731425
Where are the anarchists?
>>
>>32731417
I bet you fuckers wouldn't riot if Hillary or Bernie win.
>>
>>32731446
Please don't tease Phil or he'll get triggered and end up posting the same 3 pictures he posts every time someone talks about protesters.
>>
>>32731457
They are there. I recall watching them over the summer.
>>
>>32729974
Random sampling of keyboards is more rigorous than random sampling of people, because keyboards don't hang up on the samplers.
>>
>>32731501
I don't see a single anarchist flag or hooded black bloc in that video.
>>
>>32727936
>Rebellion
>liberals want to ban guns
I don't understand...
>>
>>32731489

It's hardly a secret that there's paid shills on 4chan.
After all, it's one of the biggest forums on the internet, and very easy to shill on.
They'd be crazy not to.
>>
>>32731516
Any path to power will do.
>>
>>32731508
It's only a small section of them. This wasn't as organized as the action in DC.

Also, a lot of times anarchists are present but don't use the black bloc. Especially in American. There have only been around 2 large instances of such over the past 20 years. 1999 in Seattle anD yesterday in DC.
>>
Can you imagine another universe where Hillary won?

The left will be calling us cucks non-stop for respecting the result.

And there will be reports of raysiss violent attacks on poor american minorities non-stop on CNN, MSBC.
>>
>>32731537
Like Trumps?
>>
>>32731440
The thing with Liberals are that they are capitalist, reformist and believe in compromise
The Communists, Anarchists and Socialist are anti-capitalist, revolutionary and reject any compromise
>>
>>32731545
What the fuck?

The anarchists protested against Trump back in the primaries used black blocs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9O9X8H_3pD0
>>
>>32731546
>reports of raysiss violent attacks on poor american minorities non-stop
How is that different from our timeline?

>>32731562
Bullshit. They're all collectivist totalitarians any more.
>>
>>32731470
I said earlier in the thread. My Socialist organizations that I am involved in would have been organizing actions anyway. It was just fine-tune for trump
>>
>>32731562
Oh but they will compromise away if a liberal wins the election.

This is why you don't see leftists protesting against Obama in 2009.
>>
>>32731561
>little to no evidence of voter fraud
>legal election
>peaceful transfer of power
I don't follow.
>>
>>32731584
Proof?

Because I don't see any socialist against Hillary or Bernie during the primaries.
>>
>>32731570
I said large instance. (Several hundered+) There have been smaller spontaneous ones though.
>>
>>32731579
It's different because the "protesters" would be demonized as raysiss white men who refuse to accept the result of the election.
>>
>>32731612
But we wouldn't have protested anything. We'd be quietly organizing offline and buying ammo.
>>
>>32731603
The anarchist protest against Trump is a constant that has been going on since fucking March.

It's definitely not spontaneous.

In fact, the black blocs are incredibly familiar attires in Trump's protest by now, next to pink hair.
>>
>>32731171
Random telephone sampling has basically been impossible to achieve over the last 15 years.

Too many people hang up now. The industry is in turmoil.

Yes, statistics are a powerfui tool, but they are only as useful as the quality of input data, and the quality of that data is in a tailspin.
>>
>>32731624
The media will always dig up shit like a nigger getting punched by a raysiss white man as evidences.
>>
>>32730250
hide in the fridge it is cold in their so the heat wont get to yoy and airtight so smoke can't get in
>>
>>32731628
I'm saying they never Organize the black blocs in advance. They will be organized quickly within a few days of the action.
>>
File: you want my what.jpg (2MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]
you want my what.jpg
2MB, 2448x3264px
>>32729585
Doesn't matter my dude. I think the majority of Americans prefer peace to an revolution if Trump is all it's a revolution against. That said, I do think he's capable of doing something that would incite one (fucking with 1A because somebody bruised his ego, etc)

Also pic related
>>
>>32731631
>Too many people hang up now. The industry is in turmoil.
With caller ID I rarely even pick up at all. I wouldn't mind if the poll took 5 minutes or less, but the last time I participated in a poll I was on the phone for 20 minutes.
>>
>>32731579
>Bullshit. They're all collectivist totalitarians any more.

Well, I see the Right wing media got to you then.
>>
>>32731570
That fucking title. Anarchists are not fucking Marxist.

They may have the same final goal, but the methods are completely different
>>
>>32731695
Funny thing about Trump is that all he does is expressing his 1A against the others's 1A.
>>
>>32731587
Heres Black Bloc from the DNC in 2008.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45CbVc1O1C4
>>
>>32731694
I'm saying black blocs are not a rare thing anymore, that they are gathered to disrupt and protest against right-wingers, nothing more.
>>
>>32731720
Nah. I judge them by their works.
>>
File: laughing specimens2.jpg (94KB, 471x361px) Image search: [Google]
laughing specimens2.jpg
94KB, 471x361px
>>32731720
>Phil
>Well, I see the Right wing media got to you then.
How fucking new are you?
>>
>>32731598
Socialist mostly used Bernie, so they held back on him. But HRC was targeted

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lANQV_5ZvYk


heres a tweet stating that we were gonna do similar shit for her

https://twitter.com/DisruptJ20/status/822531918340194306
>>
File: dont check em.png (19KB, 577x359px) Image search: [Google]
dont check em.png
19KB, 577x359px
>>32731739
I know, but now he has the ability to just remove them entirely.
>>
>>32731760
I usually stay in the Mid East threads..
>>
File: pha1nl69s02qbwe.jpg (69KB, 572x324px) Image search: [Google]
pha1nl69s02qbwe.jpg
69KB, 572x324px
>>32729527
lol
>>
>>32731749
In the US, they are still rare, at least compared to Europe.

Trumps campaign and election just sorta kickstarted it.
>>
>>32731785
So in short, if Bernie is elected, the anarchists wouldn't protest, very funny.

>But HRC was targeted
Don't see a single anarchist in there.

>https://twitter.com/DisruptJ20/status/822531918340194306
Did they protest against HRC in the primaries?
>>
>>32731812
Because one isolated instance of them burning an effigy of Obama in their property equates to this widespread looting and destruction in our major cities.
>>
>>32731820
Anarchists were actually present against Bush.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2u-9eEUkhNw

It just shows that they just target right wingers and repubs, and keep their shit down if a liberal is elected.
>>
>>32731839
Anarchists would regardless, he's still a member of the Ruling class, Socialists would be a bit more split.

>Don't see a single anarchist in there.
Just because theres no black bloc, doesn't mean that there are no Anarchists. I am an Anarchist, and I don't do black bloc shit

>Did they protest against HRC in the primaries?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxg9gPTd7Aw
>>
>>32731855
Not really what you are looking for, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jltJabqVl34

And an unorganize Black Bloc type action at the 2000 DNC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkptAMMS6q8
>>
>>32731883
>Anarchists would regardless, he's still a member of the Ruling class, Socialists would be a bit more split.
There's no anarchist protest against Bernie period.

>Just because theres no black bloc, doesn't mean that there are no Anarchists. I am an Anarchist, and I don't do black bloc shit
So there's no proof there's even anarchist there, just a bunch of liberals.

Also, that video is Bernie supporters protesting against Hillary, funnily enough.

Are anarchist bernouts?
>>
>>32731901
Also, Black Bloc from G20 in 2009 (Obamas first year)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6qpYliAjXY
>>
>>32731901
So as expected, the black bloc were indeed more active when a repub is running the show.
>>
>>32731932
That's Black bloc protesting G20, not Obama.
>>
>>32727363
I always start by hiring my local roof Koreans.
>>
>>32731947
A big thing is that they are Anti-Capitalist. Which in turn is Anti-Obama, Anti-Clinton, Anti-Bush, Anti-Everyone really.
>>
>>32731933
Eh, kinda, but really, they haven't been much of a thing out side of trhe big events like G20, Nato Summit, WTO, G8 etc. (Not to say that there would be sporadic shit against the Leader.)

Only over the past year they were kicking up.
>>
File: 1405423167904.jpg (65KB, 789x460px) Image search: [Google]
1405423167904.jpg
65KB, 789x460px
box full of these, maybe with some chlorine as well, should disperse a riot.

otherwise, unless you have a bunch of roof Koreans with saiga and vepr 12s, just GTFO
>>
>>32731976
Nah, they are not really anti-Obama, or anti-Bernie Sanders, or even anti-Hillary all that much.

Also, anarchist isn't really supposed to be anti-capitalist, they are anti-state.

>>32731994
They were a big thing under Bush.

It only got down because 8 years of Obama means socialist reign so they fade into darkness.
>>
>>32728336
Like when the liberal Jews supported communism and then the commies quietly snuffed out all the conservative Jews?
>>
File: 1478910765703.jpg (80KB, 960x518px) Image search: [Google]
1478910765703.jpg
80KB, 960x518px
>>32732024
most of the degenerate anarchists are anarcho-communists and have more in common with democrats than they do with republicans, so they tend to do this shit when a conservative is sworn in.

an-caps don't riot and much prefer to somke weed and make money and bitch about things online.
>>
>>32732058
Ancaps tend to do more useful things like buying guns and ammo and preparing for SHTF than smashing trash cans.
>>
>>32732024
>Also, anarchist isn't really supposed to be anti-capitalist, they are anti-state.
Anarchists are just as much Anti-Capitalist as they are Anti-State


>>32732024
>socialist reign so they fade into darkness.

Literally nothing he did was Socialist. Maybe marginally towards Social Democratic, but still. Not Socialist

Also, Found a Anti-Obama Black Bloc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72p9uRNqBjc
>>
>>32732093
And AnComs are the types that Join the Kurds in Syria to kill Daesh
>>
>>32732110
>Anarchists are just as much Anti-Capitalist as they are Anti-State
Straight out lie, anarchist enemy is the state, not the economic system.
>Literally nothing he did was Socialist. Maybe marginally towards Social Democratic, but still. Not Socialist
Like anarchists care, they aren't paid to protest until some right wingers take the spot.
>>
>>32732119
They are the types that are protesting in D.C. right now.

>And AnComs are the types that Join the Kurds in Syria to kill Daesh
Sure kill all dem Daesh good.
>>
>>32730952
>>
>>32732134
>Straight out lie, anarchist enemy is the state, not the economic system.
And Many of the Traditional Anarchist views see Capitalism as being a product of the state, and as such, both are targeted by any Anarchist other that "AnCaps"

>Like anarchists care, they aren't paid to protest until some right wingers take the spot. Refer to what I showed with the Anti-Obama Black Bloc, or look at almost any Black Bloc else where. Left or Right. They will fight

>>32732149
>Sure kill all dem Daesh good.
Oh? They are doing more than Assad, and The FSA/Turks
>>
>>32727363
this isn't difficult, all you need is a fire hose. This has been done since at least the 30s. Get your shit together, chump/
>>
>>32727397
I can still smell cigarette smoke through my respirator with the pink p95 cartridges. Will the multi vapor ones help with that?
>>
>>32732181
>And Many of the Traditional Anarchist views see Capitalism as being a product of the state, and as such, both are targeted by any Anarchist other that "AnCaps"
Traditional anarchism sees the state as the ultimate evil, while after communism starts appearing, they start on hating capitalism too.

>Refer to what I showed with the Anti-Obama Black Bloc, or look at almost any Black Bloc else where. Left or Right. They will fight
Where is the black bloc against Bernie?
>Oh? They are doing more than Assad, and The FSA/Turks
Oh really? We should leave them to it then. Their problem.
>>
This thread really illustrates who was /k/ before /pol/
>>
>>32732215
smoke particles are extremely fine. You'd have to spend some good money on a filter that stops even cigarette smoke. Try your mask on and see if you can smell ground pepper
>>
>>32732217
>Traditional anarchism sees the state as the ultimate evil, while after communism starts appearing, they start on hating capitalism too.
Eh, Alot AnComs predate Marxism by several decades.

>Where is the black bloc against Bernie?
Why would their be one so early in the show. The Black Blocs typically are only at the RNC/DNC and Inauguration. So, we wouldn't have seen them until then. (Again, Trump is an odd case, as we had a much more active left during the Campaign)
>>
>>32727397
You know, I really didn't care who you were, but then you put on that mask.
>>
>>32732286
>Eh, Alot AnComs predate Marxism by several decades.
Such as?

>Why would their be one so early in the show.
Because Bernie stands a chance at being a president?
>So, we wouldn't have seen them until then. (Again, Trump is an odd case, as we had a much more active left during the Campaign)
So as said, this black bloc only exists to disrupt right wingers.
>>
>>32730557
>Using stat I levels of math to create inferences about the opinions of 300M+ people based on 1000 observations

Yeah, theoretically, in a vacuum textbook example that should be fine.

But the US isn't a Stat I class you passed with a C-
>>
>>32732256
Explain?

inb4 leftists are actually the real /k/
>>
I took some photos at Milo's talk in Seattle. Bricks, rocks, piss bottles and paint balloons where threw at Milo/Trump supporters. Never got in the protesters rushed the entrance.
>>
>>32732313
The Communist Manifesto was written in 1848


Anarcho-Communist traditions began to take shape during the 17th and 18th century in England (Diggers Movement founded on shall be no buying or selling, no fairs nor markets, but the whole earth shall be a common treasury for every man," and "there shall be none Lord over others, but every one shall be a Lord of himself".) and France (Sylvain MarƩchal writing "the communal enjoyment of the fruits of the earth" and looked forward to the disappearance of "the revolting distinction of rich and poor, of great and small, of masters and valets, of governors and governed". )
>>
>>32732407
So the beta revolution comes real under leftists.
>>
>>32732407
>>
>>32732313
>Because Bernie stands a chance at being a president?
Mostly because we saw him as a tool to open people to more radical socialist ideas like Marxism or Anarchism or other stuff

>So as said, this black bloc only exists to disrupt right wingers.
This one, Yes. But not exclusively that like you claimed originally
>>
>>32732425
>>
>>32732415
Communism as a concept existed since the 16th centuries.

>Communist thought has also been traced back to the works of the 16th-century English writer Thomas More. In his treatise Utopia (1516), More portrayed a society based on common ownership of property, whose rulers administered it through the application of reason.

Traditional anarchism existed long before that.

But of course, anarchism was co-opted by communism, giving birth to anarcho-communism.
>>
>>32732442
>>
File: 1472237642860.jpg (160KB, 750x907px) Image search: [Google]
1472237642860.jpg
160KB, 750x907px
>>32731932
>physical removal
>>
>>32732432
>Mostly because we saw him as a tool to open people to more radical socialist ideas like Marxism or Anarchism or other stuff
So anarchists actually do root for politicians after all? Even politicians that want to expand government?
>This one, Yes. But not exclusively that like you claimed originally
I'm sorry but I have seen your vids, they were most active during the times when right wingers come into the spotlight.

The anarchists were a no-show under Obama.
>>
>>32732454
I said predated Marxism, which is typically what most modern forms of Communism are based off of.

But yea, they sorta both have a much longer history than that. Like the Iroquois had very Libertarian Socialist policies. Communal working of the land, gift economy, distrust of authority, autonomous communities.
>>
>>32732469
>The anarchists were a no-show under Obama.
So, the Inauguration of Obama in 2013 was a fake video of something that never happened?

>>32732469
>So anarchists actually do root for politicians after all? Even politicians that want to expand government?
Not so much that they supported him, more so that they let him be for now.
>>
File: 1420060756870.png (417KB, 1000x991px) Image search: [Google]
1420060756870.png
417KB, 1000x991px
>>32727794
>smashing windows and tipping trashcans
>overthrowing Trump
>>
>>32732494
>I said predated Marxism, which is typically what most modern forms of Communism are based off of.
Does not change the point, the hatred of capitalism was not the focal point of traditional anarchism.

>Like the Iroquois had very Libertarian Socialist policies. Communal working of the land, gift economy, distrust of authority, autonomous communities.
The iroquois was a warlord tribe that takes as much as they can get, the notion that they are peaceful noble savages is bull.
>>
>>32732514
>So, the Inauguration of Obama in 2013 was a fake video of something that never happened?
I've seen that video, they were celebrating in that video, no sign of anti-Obama.
>Not so much that they supported him, more so that they let him be for now.
Let him be for now? Even when he's an authoritian?

This is why anarchists really are pawns.
>>
>live in minnesota
>nobody does anything at all
fuck this place, at least a riot would break the monotony
>>
Another tactic used by the Koreans which can be used by any group of people to defend against rioters, especially at night is to make a wall of cars, with the doors open, so that they are touching end to end, with the lights turned on. Gives you decent cover, concealment and illumination of your perimeter. Nowhere for dindus to hide.
>>
File: theroofisonfire.jpg (71KB, 854x1000px) Image search: [Google]
theroofisonfire.jpg
71KB, 854x1000px
>>32727652

at least their not shooting up churches
>>
>>32728077

not all of them, I'm a dem. I work 50 hours a week, help with hab4humanity, involved in my community, work within the system. I think there's a lot more of them like me than the ones that like burning shit. I honestly think the ones that participate in violent protest don't give a fuck who's on the throne, they just want to see the world burn.
>>
>>32732978
Yet.
>>
>>32732978
>thinking it was real
good goy
>>
File: bradyguncampaing008689123.png (351KB, 693x659px) Image search: [Google]
bradyguncampaing008689123.png
351KB, 693x659px
>>32727794
10/10 shitpost
>>
File: 1482815136778.jpg (75KB, 750x623px) Image search: [Google]
1482815136778.jpg
75KB, 750x623px
>>32733059
t.
>>
I'm so glad seeing libtards and trumplettes fighting, they both fight for the same old shit.
>>
>>32727794
You're just being unfair now.

We only did that when he was pushing his so-called "assault weapons" ban.
>>
File: ivan ivanov.png (184KB, 501x590px) Image search: [Google]
ivan ivanov.png
184KB, 501x590px
>>32733075
Don't you have some other boards to be shilling?

I can tell by your comrade speaking in broken sentences that you aren't paid very much anyway.
>>
>>32731800
Well to get you caught up real quick, Phil is one of our inveterate shitposters. Basically tries to be as /pol/ as possible.

Generally tripfags are all shitheads, but Phil tries especially hard. Though Callum is trying to catch up to him.
>>
>>32732525
>the Iroquois can't be both
Not that I expect anyone on 4chan to know history very well.
>>
>>32733176
They pay us in Whole Foods gift cards and lentil.
>>
File: A classic for Europe.jpg (212KB, 652x774px) Image search: [Google]
A classic for Europe.jpg
212KB, 652x774px
>>32729506
Also most of his ideas are already implemented.

For instance, the ban on muslims coming from countries with terrorist activity.

The waiting list to come to America is years long because they have no fucking idea who these people are. It's pretty much halted immigration to America as they just decide to go somewhere in Europe instead.
>>
>>32732978
One idiot doesn't equate to a movement
>>
>>32733240
But apparently some idiots burn a car, and every liberal everywhere is violent and dangerous?

Sad.
>>
>>32733258
6+ idiots kicking a trash can does reflect extremely poorly on an existing organization, yes.
>>
>>32733240
>>32733258
>>32733270
>people concentrating on retards at protests instead of actually addressing government policy

Sad!
>>
>>32731366
Hell yeah, I'll bring some grain belt and JD if someone else brings nachos. I say we go full class and throw a couch or two into a pickup and go for a real relaxing riot watch.
>>
>>32730483
SIMPLE MATH
I
M
P
L
E

M
A
T
H
>>
File: 1484783900665.jpg (199KB, 1000x847px) Image search: [Google]
1484783900665.jpg
199KB, 1000x847px
>>32730548
>>
>>32733283
What government policy needs to be addressed?
>>
>>32733361
Well, in this case, the general question of "who should we elect president"

The answer, would be an unequivocal Trump from a /k/ angle. He's got an A NRA rating, he appointed General Mattis SecDef, and he wants to bring back pre-sequestration military funding.

As far as /k/ things a president can do, he checks all the boxes.
>>
>>32733399
Right, sorry I misunderstood you, I thought you were defending the rioters
>>
>>32733448
You see, if you give them attention, even negative attention, they've succeeded in making the world a more shitty place.
>>
>/pol/ organizes anti-communist action while /k/ mops around arguing with leftists
This board really has become shit.
>>
>>32733294
So simple math is how they trick the world.
>>
>>32730884

Since the burden of proof is on me, here.

http://www.infowars.com/report-three-million-votes-in-presidential-election-cast-by-illegal-aliens/

http://toprightnews.com/report-3-million-votes-in-presidential-election-cast-by-illegal-aliens-non-citizens/

https://milo.yiannopoulos.net/2016/11/illegal-immigrants-3-million-votes/

http://yournewswire.com/election-fraud-three-million-illegal-aliens/


http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/24630-vote-fraud-monitoring-group-says-three-million-noncitizens-voted-in-presidential-election

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-08/dead-people-and-illegal-immigrants-are-being-registered-vote-all-over-america

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/dead-people-and-illegal-immigrants-are-being-registered-to-vote-all-over-america

http://unclesamsmisguidedchildren.com/how-many-illegals-voted-2016-presidential-election/

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/subtract-the-illegals-and-trump-won-the-popular-vote-in-a-landslide-get-over-it-snowflakes/

https://conservativedailypost.com/we-barely-escaped-final-election-results-show-over-3-million-illegals-voted-democrat/
>>
>>32733606
>this board is shit because it's not a right-wing hivemind like /pol/!
Then why don't you go back there, cuck?
>>
>>32733811
>infowars
>proof
pick one
>>
>>32733606
I just care for guns to be owned by EVERY american that wants one.

>>32733811
Can you source a non biased news website?
>>
>>32733841
Because CNN is so trustworthy right?
>>
>>32733830
This board is shit because it's used to one of the premier anti-communist board, but nowadays it sticks to entertaining communists instead of hunting them the fuck down.

>Then why don't you go back there, cuck?
I browse both boards, cuck.
>>
>>32733862
>I just care for guns to be owned by EVERY american that wants one.
The leftists do not care about guns.
>Can you source a non biased news website?
How are these non biased news website?
>>
>>32733867
If you did then you'd know that you're full of shit and 'historically' /k/ has generally agreed to disagree about politics and celebrate our mutual love of weapons and war.

Also a big thing about /k/ is freedom. And shockingly, "hunting people down" is kinda seen as the sort of thing that statist cucks do. And /k/ jerks off to the idea of killing them.
>>
>>32733862
Would you rather me link news sites that are two busy kissing clintons ass and inciting violence?
>>
>>32733877
>implying infowars is non-biased
Put your tripcode back on Phil, you're not fooling anyone.
>>
>>32733939
/k/ is one of the most political board before the rise of /pol/.

Remove kebab is a meme invented by /k/ after all.

>Also a big thing about /k/ is freedom. And shockingly, "hunting people down" is kinda seen as the sort of thing that statist cucks do. And /k/ jerks off to the idea of killing them.
What? Coming from the very same people who says remove kebab and leftists? Should /k/ kill itself then?
>>
>>32733954
Infowars correctly predicted Trump's win.

I think it's you should start listening.
>>
>>32733958
>Remove kebab is a meme invented by /k/ after all.
Yeah, and most of us didn't take is seriously. Just like most of 4chan uses nigger and fag and doesn't take it seriously. There was even that entire time that we called them Redguard, after something from Skyrim.

No better proof that you're an idiot who came over here from /pol/, that you think mems are real. You should become an hero.
>>
>>32733994
>Yeah, and most of us didn't take is seriously.
Hey says you, how do you know "most of us" do not take it seriously? Do you speak for all of /k/?
>There was even that entire time that we called them Redguard, after something from Skyrim.
Found the real newfag.

>No better proof that you're an idiot who came over here from /pol/, that you think mems are real. You should become an hero.
Memes are ideas, but /k/ from the beginning has been an anti-leftist board, evidences of this board exist in the board's archive.
>>
>>32734015
And if you look closely, whenever some retard came in rambing about "muh rope day", they'd get shut down by everyone, including the 'anti-leftists'
>>
>>32734043
Actually, if you look closely, you would see that the majority of /k/ favor rope day.

I can provide proofs of that, but can you provide proof of what you claim?
>>
>>32734070
>I can provide proofs of that
You mean you can provide links to a few threads. And if I go combing through the archives, so can I.

That you think most of /k/ is in favor of arbitrarily murdering people, when "freedom!" is one of the founding principles of this board, along with firearms, proves you for a liar.
>>
The attempt to whitewash /k/, nay all of 4chan, continues.

Soon, 4chan will be remembered as a communist site in 2004 if we allow these revisionists to keep up their shit.
>>
>>32734113
>You mean you can provide links to a few threads. And if I go combing through the archives, so can I.
Yes, I can, I got proofs, but you don't.
>That you think most of /k/ is in favor of arbitrarily murdering people, when "freedom!" is one of the founding principles of this board, along with firearms, proves you for a liar.
This board is founded from the principle of freedom, not cuckoldry, and this means freedom from leftists and communists who desire gun control.
>>
>>32734141
>the statists are the damn libruls
>not the people who want to kill everyone who thinks differently than them
Topkek. Goosestepping statists like you are the biggest cucks around. Obsessing over the edicts of some glorious leader and getting triggered by anyone who dares to disagree.

>I can provide proof
You can provide a link to every thread on 4chan ever? Because if you want to actually prove shit, you can't just post a bunch of cherry picked threads and declare victory, moron.
>>
>>32734189
I can provide proof to you that the majority of Day of the Rope threads were positive,, the same as War against Northern Aggression thread, this is the same board that utilizes dindus after all.

>Topkek. Goosestepping statists like you are the biggest cucks around.
Yeah, /k/ loved anti-statist like those liberals and leftists.

Why do you do this man? I thought communists hate revisionists?
>>
>>32734226
>keeps saying that they can provide proof that /k/ loves statist death squads
>doesn't post shit
Put up or shit up.

Also
>implying all liberals are statists
Somehow over the last few posts, you've managed to construct a slippery slope entirely out of strawmen.
>>
>>32734265
>Put up or shit up.
I'm having trouble finding the 2010-2007 archives.
>implying all liberals are statists
I'm loving these implications, like you imply /k/ has ever liked liberals and leftists because "freedom".
>>
You know since trump won and got sworn in i thought the trumplettes would leave already. i just want to discuss guns :/
>>
File: 1447038350562.png (981KB, 1024x1017px) Image search: [Google]
1447038350562.png
981KB, 1024x1017px
>>32727404
A portable TV helps.
>>
>>32729694
There's protests in Britain for fuck sake. Woman against racism or some shit. They're so misguided. Maybe I should go and counter protest
Thread posts: 353
Thread images: 49


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.