I want to get a Sig p320 with a manual safety, but they seem

halp!

>>32725904
As of now you can't, it was developed for the US military MHS trials.

>>32726058
To add, with the P320 selected as the new service pistol of the USAF and Army, you'll probably start seeing them next year.

>>32725904
What you gonna do with your P226 NavySeulz Anchor now, fuccboi?

>>32726074

they're probably gonna focus on hitting their contracts, and overruns will fill up the stores after.

>>32725904

I really don't like Sig's control layout - slide lock lever and the safety is too close but even in their P-series pistols the decocker and slide lock were too close.

I've opted for a safety-less p320 as it is less busy and easier to operate. And yes I'd rather blow a hole through my leg then to fumble with a god damn safety switch.

>>32726058
the MA compliant version has a safety

>>32727153

hopefully you don't tend to ride the slide lock, but even with my stock P320 i've done it.

still pretty pumped that it'll be my new service pistol.

>>32725904
Absolutely disgusting. I love my P320, but that safety looks retarded.

>>32725904
Why would you want one? It was an army requirement in the MHS program because most non-combat arms soldiers are complete retards and can't be trusted with a weapon like a Glock.

>>32725904
Sigs promotional videos states that frame and trigger safeties are available "as a law enforcement option". I have never seen one at any gun store and I just took a quick look at Sigs website and none of the grip modules or X-Change kits seem to have the frame safety. you may have to buy a regular 320 and contact Sig to special order a grip or trigger with a safety.

seems like an interesting concept but I'm going to wait to see if the manufacturers follow suit in with the modular pistol design.

Anyone know if the M&P2.0 can swap frames? Since it was designed for the MHS trials as well you'd think so but I haven't heard anything about it.