EOTech Debate

>>32722261
Bumps because I want to hear the memes substantiated.

>>32722261
they got btfo so hard they had no questions asked full refunds.

>>32722261
>I hear so many memes about EOTech, are they truly as bad as people say they are?

A lot of the problems were fixed a long time ago, but they never disclosed the issues to SOCOM. All red dots will suffer from zero drift. I've managed to have broken both aimpoints and EOTechs. Read for yourself.

http://www.eotechinc.com/dear-valued-eotech-customer

>>32722261
>caring what people think on a hmong cave rune board

you really need to set yourself on fire at your earliest convenience.

>>32722261
good shit, but pricey. Earlier stuff was rough and some of that kinda got memed on to the brand, but imo its pretty legit stuff nowadays.

>>32722296
Could you elaborate?

Any links?

C R U T C H
R
U
T
C
H

>>32722338
my mom says you were a faggot that sucked with iron sights

>>32722331
http://www.eotechlawsuit.com/

http://soldiersystems.net/2015/12/08/l3-communications-eotech-issuing-refunds-for-holographic-weapon-sights/

http://www.gunssavelife.com/?p=20672

>>32722261
All optics experience Thermal Drift
In a test conducted with an Aimpoint and EOTech, the Aimpoint drifted 3.5 MOA while the EOTech drifted 4 MOA

>>32722897
Can you please source this? I am very interested in this kind of data.

bump for interest