https://youtu.be/gVOFoAEcrsc
>>32655375
there is nothing illegal about building your own firearm. Its a semi auto pistol and it doesn't have a stock or forgrip or anything like that so what is the point of this thread?
>>32655387
It's an open bolt design. That said, Alaska has laws that allow you to make full auto guns if you keep them in-state, and ATF can go bugger themselves. Not sure how much people want to test state vs fed laws though.
>>32655458
As this post says its an open bolt so even if it were modified to be semi only it is still illegal for the simple fact it is an open bolt. As far as the ATF is concerned open bolt is always full auto.
>>32655387
Open bolts are considered machine guns by ATF
>>32655458
>>32655478
i can't wait until the ATF is disbanded
>>32655478
>>32655458
>>32655467
Has that ever actually been tested in court? Because the statute itself makes no mention of open bolt guns being regulated. The only distinction is between semi-auto and full-auto.
The ATF can bitch all they want, but if someone refuses to plead guilty, they'll have to prove their case in court.
>>32655529
Ruling is based around that open bolt guns with a simple disconnector design are very easy to convert into machine guns.
But the ATF made a blanket ruling that ALL open bolt guns are illegal, should someone make an open bolt gun with a more sophisticated mechanism to ensure that it couldn't be readily converted to FA, they could rape the ATF and its ruling in court.
>>32655647
>they could rape the ATF and its ruling in court.
And they could also get their asses raped in a court battle that becomes increasingly expensive to continue. I'll let someone else fight that battle.
>>32656044
Generally with the ATF's more arcane bullshit it doesn't even make it to a trial; the judge gets pissed and drops the charges because it's not the ATF's job to interpret the law
>>32655486
Then this guy's dog would really be getting shot when the FBI rolls up.