Is it possible to create an organic/living/symbiont weapon?

>>32638609
AIDS

>>32638609
not at our current level of technology

>viral weapons

there

/thread

>>32638609
Biological and bacteriological weapon is there for ages. What you can expect in decade - modified remote controlled rats and insects.

>>32638609
Our penises are this already
>/thread

We already have, its called a US Marine.

>>32638609
Why would you want this when you could have a gun that is made of hard-wearing metal that doesn't also need to eat and shit?

>>32638609
I mean we used(tested) weapons like remote detonating fire bats during ww2. And the we use trained animals all the time to use as an aggresive weapon.

>>32638609
>get cats
>hit them and piss them off
>throw at the enemy

>get geese
>train it to attack targets with a red dot on them
>shine laser at target
>laser guided geese

File: bat-bomb-shell.jpg (2MB, 1285x2048px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1285x2048px

>>32638609
Didn't we already try that with bats in WW2?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat_bomb

>>32638609
What advantage would that have over, you know, a regular gun?

File: you should be terrified of women.jpg (1MB, 2487x1858px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2487x1858px

Its called pussy. Ruins 100% of lives.

>>32639778

this guy just looks perpetually uncomfortable

perhaps...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNLPXzlz6-I

>>32639778
poor brendan

>>32638609
You mean like a rattlesnake that shoots out of your ass?

>>32639426
>>32639579
easier to find food and clean up crap than make bullets.

File: 1483682608695.gif (713KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

713KB, 420x420px

>>32638609
Yes, just find a human of the opposite gender and boom.

in 12 years you have an effective, completely autonomous killing machine

>>32638609
we tested out pigeons as guidance mechanisms for bombs in ww2.

They werent bad either, certainly good accuracy for the era. Thanks BF Skinner.