[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Take the Montana class, take away its armor except around critically

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 21
Thread images: 5

File: Montana_Class.png (59KB, 300x156px) Image search: [Google]
Montana_Class.png
59KB, 300x156px
Take the Montana class, take away its armor except around critically important areas like the reactor (it's going to be nuclear powered) and give it a few modifications.

>rail guns instead of 16 inch guns
>1000-1200 cells for AA missiles
>200-300 antiship missiles
>attach some CIWS (10-15 units)
>AEGIS
>drone launcher

Explain to me in detail why this won't work. Countries would have to dedicate their entire Navys to fighting this thing and still lose. It's nothing knew it's simply modern technology but upscaled. We've cucked the world with our carriers, lets now cuck them with our MSBs (Modern Super Battleships).
>>
File: anti ship missile.gif (2MB, 500x226px) Image search: [Google]
anti ship missile.gif
2MB, 500x226px
>>
File: 1462079213120.jpg (28KB, 442x341px) Image search: [Google]
1462079213120.jpg
28KB, 442x341px
>>32620459
>costs about as much as 15 DDGs if not more
>does not even come close to protecting the same total area
>cannot spread across an ocean or be in different places at once
>radar picket capability would be dogshit
>more vulnerable to swarm attacks
>attack submarine's wet dream
>>
>>32620500
Source
>>
>>32620459
if you werent a mouth-breathing window licker, you'd understand that its nothing more than a giant target. they were obsolete before the end of WW2 which is why we didnt build any more.
>>
>>32620459
How about this:
Take the montana, remove all its guns
Still have it nuclear powered, make its citadel smaller and thinner then offset it to one side.
Then put a bit flat bit of metal down the full length of it so we can launch aircraft from it.
If we added some lifts, then we could store the aircraft inside the ship too!
I wonder why no one else has thought of this.
>>
>>32620475
Sauce on gif?

Also, OP is retarded. Look up the crew requirements, they needed 1800 crew when they just had the guns, adding more complex weapons is going to make it worse. Also lol WW2-era steam turbines.

>Montana class

Oh I just noticed you said this instead of Iowa class, this is even dumber. Iowa at least has the advantage of being already laid down and needing just upgrades, building a never-built battleship class from scratch is just dumb.
>>
Because then all it takes is one small boat or submarine with one single rail gun to punch a hole in it and cripple it. Having fuck huge piles of long range bombardment doesn't help you if you can be taken out before you can use all of those weapons. Aircraft carriers do anything that the weirdo rail gun battleship could do better, including long range bombardment when you realize just how much power is consumed and how much wear and tear firing a rail gun generates.
>>
>>32620593
FUND IT
>>
>>32620459
You would be better off taking the montana, taking its turrets away and replacing them with lots of VLS cells, replacing all its secondary batteries with CIWS, and keeping its armor as is (or strengthening it)

That would be a useful modern battleship
>>
Battleships are stupid, a heavy cruiser would be a much better idea.
>>
Then we send it to make a hole in China's missile defense island forts, when it hits the Chink coast, we scuttle it by melting down the reactor next to one of the most populated places in the world.
Don't worry about the crew, we will have it crewed by all the trannies and such
>>
Put it this way, how would a CSG deal with a threat like this? Say 2-3 of these monsters vs a CSG.
>>
>>32620459
>literally one fucking torpedo
>just one
>>
>>32620774
"If you attack our CSG we will take it as an act of war and nuke you so hard your grandchildren's chromosomes will feel it"
>>
>>32620459
>Rail Guns

You need 18 to be here son.
>>
>>32620671
>we will have it crewed by all the trannies and such

Put your trip back on Phil.
>>
>>32620845
go back to >>>/lgbt/ degenerate
>>
stop replying to battleship threads already /k/.

let this nignog rot.
>>
File: 74d.jpg (21KB, 456x297px) Image search: [Google]
74d.jpg
21KB, 456x297px
>>32620459
One full loads of missiles would cost well over half a billion dollars.
>>
>>32620459
>>32620636

Since you wouldn't have to worry about muzzle blast or fire arcs in a battleship v battleship fight, it would make much more sense to go with an N3-style design with an armored citadel in the style of the Zumwalt's superstructure with two turrets ahead and one aft, flanked by CIWS/HELLADS/etc, with a second armored citadel to the rear for the reactor, which could then be flanked by 200-300 or so peripheral and traditional VLS cells and the helicopter deck.

Armor it like a WWII BB, possibly with laminate armor to save weight and kill the shaped charges in ASM's, and give it the RCS reduction features of the Zumwalt.

Now you've got God's own flagship and surface combatant.
Thread posts: 21
Thread images: 5


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.