it is 1.1.1941, Hitler is dead, his testament names you Führer.

Nigga that's only two choices

And the answer is MiG-21

>>32612780

You only gave 3 options. And the easy answer is the MIGS. Air superiority is essential to ground combat.

That's basic basic basic strategy.

File: oxygino_mig21_04.jpg (115KB, 1024x734px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1024x734px

>>32612881
>>32612904

OP here, I fucked up the formatting, should have been:

>300 MiG-21S, fuel and ammo is provided and not limited (every plane returning to base can be refueled and rearmed without delays); due to advanced mind modification the aliens can train pilots, crew, mechanics etc. within 2 days

>600 T-64BV, fuel and ammo is provided and not limited (every tank returning to base can be refueled and rearmed without delays); due to advanced mind modification the aliens can train pilots, crew, mechanics etc. within 2 days to supply you with a group of inital personnel.

>100 Tu-22M3, fuel and ammo is provided and not limited (every tank returning to base can be refueled and rearmed without delays); due to advanced mind modification the aliens can train pilots, crew, mechanics etc. within 2 days to supply you with a group of inital personnel.

>>32612881
Dear Lord, just think what a guy like Hans-Ulrich Rudel would do with MiG.

Rudel flew 2,530 combat missions on the Eastern Front of World War II. The majority of these were undertaken while flying the Junkers Ju 87, although 430 were flown in the ground-attack variant of the Focke-Wulf Fw 190. He was credited with the destruction of 519 tanks, severely damaging the battleship Marat, as well as sinking a cruiser, a destroyer and 70 landing craft. Rudel also claimed to have destroyed more than 800 vehicles of all types, over 150 artillery, anti-tank or anti-aircraft positions, 4 armored trains, as well as numerous bridges and supply lines. Rudel was also credited with 9 aerial victories, 7 of which were fighter aircraft and 2 Ilyushin Il-2s. He was shot down or forced to land 30 times due to anti-aircraft artillery, was wounded five times and rescued six stranded aircrew from enemy held territory.[56]

>>32612780
None of those would do any good.

Germany lost the war because they were obsessed with memes, picking fights, and butchering civilians instead of fighting enemies. They should've stopped at Poland and consolidated their territory gains.

No technology is foolproof: eventually one will end up in enemy hands and they'll reverse engineer the sucker and fuck you over. In fact, that happened several times during the war.

>>32612954
>it is 1.1.1941

>>32612780
Take a MiG-21 and defect.

>>32612881
this

the war was over after the luftwaffe lost the ability to project air power into the British isles and even more over once their tanks started getting their shit pushed in by ground attack aircraft

also >russian material

>>32612929
>Tu-22M3
>every tank returning to base

What are you smoking, comrade? Sikrit dokuments?

File: Tupolev Tu-22M.jpg (198KB, 1024x780px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1024x780px

>>32612995
every plane. dear god, C/P is a dick if you don't pay attention....

>>32612975
so you're saying Tu-22 can't project air power over Britain?

>russian material
then why are you so scared of big bad russia it's basically all your Fake News and Clinton News Network ever report when they find the time to stop propping up BLM?

File: 4000_lb_Cookies_and_Lancaster_at_RAF_Mildenhall_WWII_IWM_CH_17903.jpg (64KB, 800x593px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 800x593px

>>32613035
Try building large concrete runways in Germany in 1945. Then consider the effort it would require to have them still there for your aircraft to get back to.
You'd just be putting the inevitable off.

>>32612780
700 tonk and 300 migs also
>migs could deliever nuclear bombs
Gg no ree

>>32612780
why would I want any of that russian garbage

File: Anoriant_submarine.jpg (49KB, 447x155px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 447x155px

>>32613080
>Try building large concrete runways in Germany in 1945
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keroman_Submarine_Base

The nazis have literally reinforced whole mountains with cocrete mate...

>>32612968
Yes, and?

>>32613154
Wunderwaffen projects haven't really squandered too much ressources yet on useless shit.

>>32612780
How many times are you going to remake this same fucking thread?

>>32613189
>How many times are you going to remake this same fucking thread?

Many. I'm interested in ppl's opinions.

>>32613151
Put air spaced concrete roofs over your runways and they might still be there when you get back.
This is '45 and air superiority is someone else's the net is closing and you need pensioners and children to hold the front line.
Run is your option. That or death.

>>32613236
>This is '45
dude
>>32612780
>it is 1.1.1941
The war just started.

>>32613262
My bad "Hitler is dead" put me on a tangent. Tu22 any day.

>>32612930
Rudel's kill count is probably overclaimed by an order of magnitude

File: mig21s-1[1].gif (618KB, 1200x1209px) Image search: [Google]

618KB, 1200x1209px

>>32612780
MiG-21S can carry nukes. Those scenarios are autistic and idiotic.

>>32612780
>Which weapon do you pick?
Reason and not attacking the USSR. Also Tu-22M any day. Britain rekt in an days, US Navy rekt in an weeks.

>>32613662
>Britain rekt in an days, US Navy rekt in an weeks.

and USSR rekt in anmonths at the latest. Why not attack them then? Gommunism needs to die.

>>32613746
Why on earth would you attack a friendly socialist country?

>>32613786
Socialists love to war among each other. There can only be one!

>>32613832
Coming from a capitalist hegemon this is of course golden :^)

>>32612780

It doesn't really matter. The AI cheats so they'll have double the numbers of MiGs or T-64s.

>>32613080
The allies were ineffective at precision bombing

STOP
MAKING THIS
THREADDDD
REEEEEEEEEEEEee

>>32612929
If the TU-22s include nuclear armament, it's a nobrainer.

Tu22 and bomb the shit out of allied rear areas and Britian.

File: 681BC49C_5056_A318_A8FACFC2718C622C.jpg (71KB, 360x260px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 360x260px

>>32613941
It was in its infancy.
These guys were out to fix that.

>>32614173
MiG-21 includes it too. On the other hand you won't even need it.

>>32613197
>admitting to spamming

That's against the rules.

Tu-22 slinging cruise missiles would be very powerful against the allies economy and navies, the could even fly to Japan, refuel; and decimate the US pacific fleet

File: Lancaster_617_Sqn_RAF_dropping_Grand_Slam_bomb_on_Arnsberg_viaduct_1945.jpg (126KB, 800x604px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 800x604px

>>32614194

>>32614173
>>32613507
nukes obviously aren't included.

>>32613197

It's always Mig 21, told you like 5 billion times faglord.

>>32614439
it seems the general consensus is the Tu is better. I tend to agree. One ASM for one carrier seems a good trade.

File: Il76-445798.jpg (178KB, 1758x885px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 1758x885px

>>32612780
Il-76 might, just might, have given them a fighting chance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLxEHIbHUlY

>>32612780
You're gay as fuck.

>>32614456
>Dats UN-BEH-LEE-VA-BEL
Il-76 can take off and land on dirt lanes, if wouldn't even notice if it crossed the strip there.

>>32614456
>anglo scum making fun about a plan crashing

eternal anglos are niggers.

>>32613786
>socialist

The NSDAP kinda killed all of its socialists a few years before the war...

>>32614665
He really used up ALL of the runway. What's the betting that MTOW was way down his list of considerations.

>>32614693
The cunt managed to miss the scenery. What's your problem?

>>32614709
Are you one of those people who think Nazis were right wing?

>>32613154
In 41 it wasn't terrible.

The US was heavily recommending a neutrality pact with Germany, because they didn't want to get into the fucking war. Pearl Harbor hadn't happened yet (Dec 1941), and the only thing the US was doing was giving materiel to the Allies.

You could potentially avert Operation Compass and save the Italians asses.

Reinforce Rommel and prevent Egypt from getting fucked. Also prevent the loss of oil in Norway to the brits.

If you took over in 1941 with the knowledge you have now and a few good jets, you could dogshit easily win the war for Germany.

>>32614693
Fuck off divide and conquer kike.

>>32614723
It's more like the runaway itself is too short for this aircraft class and the pilot using it all to assure proper take off. Anyway, what I mean is that it would barely be an issue even if he went beyond the runway.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrrtrRz1A2Q

>>32614756
Are you one of those retards who never heard of the Night of Long Knives?

They used to have both left and right wings in the 30's. Then Hitler stabbed the socialsit wing in the back. Literally.

>>32614760
>with the knowledge you have now


you wouldn't be able toe get around having to prevent the US developing nukes.... something would hve to be done about that. the US would get uppity one way or the other if the UK was demolished and forbidden to have a fleet/army and all of eastern europe and Russia was occpied and ethnically cleansed.

>>32614760
>Reinforce Rommel

WIth what? And how are you going to supply it when the italian merchant marine is barely able to deliver enough for the troops already there?

>>32614800
Hitler was socialist, idiot.

100 T-64BV

those filthy kommunisten will never know what hit em

>>32614824
>100 T-64BV, those filthy kommunisten will never know what hit em

The T-64 would be immune to anything it would encounter on either front and with it's speed and NV, one T-64 could probably kill as many russian tanks as it has AT rounds.

>>32614814
Presumably with your effectively invulnerable tanks or planes.

Call me crazy, but I have the odd feeling that a MIG would do reasonably well against, say, a Spitfire. And a T-whatever would do reasonably well against a Cromwell.

>>32612780
MiG-21.
Don't attack Russia, destroy Britain's air forces, push for truce afterwards, providing that you get to hold all lands as they are now.
In ten years time, team up with Britain and the US to shrek Russia.

>>32614879
yeah, Brits are gonna go with that for sure....

>>32614875
you can have only one weapons system - tanks, MiGs or Tus.

>>32613095
Because it works :)

>>32614903
>Tanks
Effectively invulnerable until possibly the 50's if armor research continues exactly the way it did in our timeline
>MiGs
Can outrun, outclimb, outshoot anything until at least 1960
>TUS
CAS more deadly and accurate until anything until the late 60s.

Again, call me crazy, but with any choice you'd be fairing pretty well. You'd be able to stall the US' nuclear R&D because - surprise - a lot of that research and those researchers were working for Germany in one way or another before we "reclaimed" them.

>>32614893
They will when they have no air defence.
When they have no offensive capabilities and their territory is no longer threatened, they will definitely take a truce.

>>32612780
>force truce with bongland. No civilian bombing shit
>go into Russia as liberators instead of butchers
>turn Russians on Russians
>stop wasting resources on rounding up and killing Jews
>drop Japan and Italy like a fucking rock and try to kiss Americas ass as much as possible
>talk to America about liberating Russia from the evil commies

>>32614974
More like talk to Russia about liberating America from the evil capitalists.

>>32612780

Stop posting the same exact thread over and over OP, you 9M111.