No Tactical Advantage Thread

>>32596999
>better grip
>Less weight
>Better heat dissipation.

>>32596999
OP here. I had a question: How old does a gun need to be before you wouldn't consider getting it engraved. For example, let's say I wanted to get moderate, tasteful engravings on my Wanad. It was made in 88'. Is that "modern" or would you consider it historical enough to be left alone?

Also, if you became famous, would you get your guns distinctively engraved so that future generations could identify them. Like some Ashlands farmer in the distant future goes scavving through old ruins, and he comes across some old Vintorez that's well engraved and pretty distinctive looking. He takes it with him, even though the overlords would kill him for having it. Some bullshit happens, and the kid is now leading a revolution. Later, in one of the libraries he finds an old leather-bound journal from an Ashlands historian. In it is a drawing of that same Vintorez. The journal speaks of a figure who by now is regarded as a legend: Ivan of the Ashlands, who in one night slew 500 Ashwalkers with his mighty Vintorez, thus saving his village. His memory has faded to mythology and folklore, but this rifle and ancient manuscript prove he lived. With that knowledge, the engraved Vintorez becomes a symbol of the revolution, and it becomes the Rifle of Promised Victory.

Would you get your gun engraved and individualized for the sake of legend?

>>32597128
I'd engrave a new gun before an old one. If I had the cash, I'd get my new 1911 engraved.

>>32596999
"Succesful execution of highly dangerous state orders, as well as valor and courage shown in the line of duty."

File: vvUi83V.jpg (274KB, 1772x881px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 1772x881px

>>32596999

>>32597008
I hope you're joking.

File: 1483220403598.gif (2MB, 305x380px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 305x380px

>>32596999
>Mr. Ocelot is correct

Ocelot is quoting Big Boss you child

>>32597835
Why? It's all true

File: ok.jpg (170KB, 1600x673px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1600x673px

>>32596999
FREEEEEEEDOM

>>32600132

i wish they put this much attention to detail when they QC their m4s

File: download (5).jpg (6KB, 255x197px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 255x197px

Here's a nice one.

File: 33225.jpg (162KB, 700x541px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 700x541px

>>32602849
Sorry about that, let's try bigger.