105 mm howitzer in the nose of a plane when?
>>32595946
Schwerer Gustav in the nose of a plane when?
>>32595946
They have them those modified c130 planes for cas, can't remember the exact designation of it though
>>32596220
AC-130H and W. I work them. I'll answer what I can. Before you ask that's the dolly that we keep the 105 brushes in.
>>32596293
I've always wondered; how badly does recoil knock the plane off course? How does the pilot compensate for it?
They thought about doing that with a Chinook, but it would have made it too slow.
>>32596450
I don't actually get to fly on them when they shoot. I just maintain all the weapons and load them. According to the air crews it's not that bad.
>>32595946
Is it the B-25 ?
>>32595946
What about an AC-130 kind of system built out of a C-5 or C-17?
You could have massive artillery going the length of the cargo bay or an MLRS system deployable from the rear.
>>32595946
Do you even P.108A Artigliere ?
>>32599070
Yep looks like it
>>32599211
I wanted to sperg about this too but it's actually a 102mm.
Dude lets stick a 355.6mm recoilless rifle on a Do-217!!1!!!!!!111!!!!!!!
>it fucks up the tail so bad the one time its fired that it is never tried again
>>32599070
>Is it the B-25 ?
Are you retarded? Thats a fucking pe-3
How about this.
>AC-5 Apocalypse.
>Armament.
>x1 GAU8 Avenger, x1 76mm gun, x1 120mm gun.
>Nose mounted 105mm Gatling cannon.
>>32602145
In theory, an AN-255 has enough lifting capacity to carry one of the Iowa's 16 inch guns and over a hundred shells.
>>32599196
Or you could just drop JDAMs.
>>32602059
Nope, that's the B-25H. Fitted with a 75 mm cannon in the nose.
>>32603682
+ 2 tiny tims
>>32602318
They could literally Orbitally Nuke the Russian Separatists if they can get high enough
>>32602318
But I wonder how it would deal with the forces of recoil. Those 16 inch guns rock an Iowa class pretty good and that's a 58,000 tons
You could probably shoot it and then the plane would basically like a fly in 60 MPH winds