Mosin thread? Show your nuggets

File: IMG_0232.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

>>32581310
sounds good.

fuckin file size, cant post full pictures.

File: Screenshot_20170108-201453.png (643KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

643KB, 720x1280px

Olga bolga cyka blyat

Litterally a meme

File: IMG_0299.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

>>32582481

>>32582572
everything is a meme

>>32582572
Calling things a meme is a meme

>>32582592
But the nugget is an even older meme back when meme meant something different

File: tulsky.jpg (613KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

613KB, 1024x768px

>>32582572
Livin' the meme.

File: IMG_0235.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>32582578
moar nuggets!

File: IMG_0800.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>32582899

>>32581310
I would but I sold mine today.

File: IMG_4532.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

Here are my two finns:

1942 Tikka M91 on a 1900 Tula receiver
1934 Izhevsk 91/30 finn capture & restock

File: IMG_0754.jpg (1MB, 2370x3161px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2370x3161px

>>32582578
Ayyyy

File: IMG_1151.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>32583713
Noice, just too bad for that import mark and would be sweet if it stayed a Dragoon.
>>32582578
Is an M91 though, still looking for a Dragoon for the collection. And a Ka3 but that's another matter.

File: IMG_2312ad.jpg (130KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1600x1200px

Here is my M91/30 PU, 1942 Izhevsk.

whats a quick rundown of what kind of nug i should get as my first

>>32581310
where can i find nuggets for around $200 now that everyones buying them up

File: IMG_20161202_111947.jpg (1010KB, 1250x3226px) Image search: [Google]

1010KB, 1250x3226px

>>32582572
I'm ok with this

File: IMG_20161205_135856.jpg (2MB, 4594x1011px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4594x1011px

>>32586684

>>32586676
Try a pawn shop.

File: IMG_20161205_135837.jpg (2MB, 4142x946px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4142x946px

>>32586695
Why are nugget threads always incredibly bare, if the rifle is so supposedly prolific

File: yUoMXZK.jpg (3MB, 5094x1686px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5094x1686px

>>32586701
I never really wanted one until this one sort of fell into my lap.

>>32581310
>no longer $80 - $100
>all are sporterized
hold me bros

>>32586701
Maybe because you faggots bought them all

File: IMG_20161208_133902.jpg (3MB, 3006x4072px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3006x4072px

>>32586748
B-but I only own one

They cost 400 bones now.

Id buy one for 175 max.

>>32582734
I love the PCFCP rifles. Next on my list after a Dragoon and Chatellerault.
>>32585585
Since no one else is going to answer, look for a pre-war 91/30 that matches that hasn't been refurb if possible. If it was me, I would get an M91, the rarest one I could find to have something a little different and with more investment value(I.E. Sestroryetsk, Westinghouse, Remington, Chatellerault, 91/38 any Arsenal or even a 91/59) the M91s are nicer in my opinion honestly.
>>32587147
Sex

File: Mosins72015.jpg (2MB, 4241x1761px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4241x1761px

My current three, I had a N.E.W. Bannerman conversion for a little while but I sold it to buy my SKS.

Top is a Remington M91, 1917
Middle is a Tula 91/30 PU Sniper, 1943
Bottom is a Tula 91/30, 1943

File: IMG_0755.jpg (2MB, 2376x3169px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2376x3169px

>>32585433
It doesn't really bother me as it's on the opposite side of the bolt handle. My other nugget had it on the right side and it ruined the looks. And yea I wish it was still a dragoon, but the bolt cycles smooth as hell and is pretty accurate for a mosin

File: IMG_0764.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>32588384
Innasnow

File: 20160607_161632.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

Did someone say nuggets

File: 20160602_151935.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

Cuz I think I heard someone say nuggets

>>32588539
Oh you certainly did hear someone say nuggets. All my pics except the ones I posted are apparently over the limit though damnit.

File: IMG_0253.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>32581310
Finn mosin best mosin

File: IMG_20161207_131816.jpg (1MB, 1872x1872px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1872x1872px

>>32581310

>>32589593
Forgot to mention she's a 1938 Tula

>>32589593
Something happened to your stock

File: 20160220_144142.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

In with a finn

File: 20140628_212428.jpg (3MB, 4128x2322px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4128x2322px

woo mosin thread.

>>32581310
I would like to buy one but I have no fucking idea where to start, or what to expect for Kansas.

File: 20140628_184804.jpg (2MB, 4128x2322px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4128x2322px

my favorite one

File: 20140628_185031.jpg (3MB, 4128x2322px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4128x2322px

woops wrong one

File: 20160524_151357.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

I don't own half of these anymore but it's good for trolling.

File: Snapchat-75464136.jpg (169KB, 512x910px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 512x910px

Heres the rollmark on my 1926 tula ex dragoon

File: 20140628_184543.jpg (3MB, 4128x2322px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4128x2322px

this goes to the worn one up top

>>32589898
91/38?
>>32589919
>1894
Nice. My oldest is the 1899 Sestroryetsk up top the thread. Still looking for that Chatellerault though

Why does this forum love nuggets so much when you can buy a $400 savage that is literally 4x more accurate, lighter, and stronger?

>>32590045
Thats fuddy as fuck, some people collect military rifles for history or for the reason of fuck you. Some of those finns you see up there go for as much as 1100 nowadays. First it was k98's then the lee enfield now and sadly the last of the milsurps, mosins. Mosins are not the "cheap" beater rifles they used to be.

File: 20160220_143710.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>>32590045
Nice bait my friend

>>32590007
yeah, it's seen some shit and had a fair share of owners 1914-1955

File: sako-tigerstripe.jpg (2MB, 4320x2432px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4320x2432px

>>32590160
This

File: 201053187.jpg (3MB, 2432x4320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2432x4320px

>>32590511

>>32590391
1914-1955? So it isn't a Czech 91/38? I'm confused.

File: IMG_20161201_110356.jpg (2MB, 5344x856px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5344x856px

>>32590555
My mosin is also striped. But I don't know why

File: 67ceebbca883cbac29eb4695c891fbf084058c59_hq.jpg (62KB, 945x1024px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 945x1024px

/k/omrads, I need some help with my Mosin.
>M53.
>02 stamp.
>SN. CB0085.
Found it in a dumpster. It has issues feeding, chambering, extracting, and ejecting.
>Feeding.
Have to work the bolt VERY slowly, and some times have to hammer bolt closed.
>Chambering.
Sometimes bolt won't hold the bullet.
>Extracting.
Bolt won't eject round, forcing me to pull bolt out and hammer round out.
What is wrong?

>>32591771
Have you thoroughly de-greased the bolt parts and inside the chamber area/bolt lug recesses. If you only have issues with cycling when a round is loaded, and there's no crap in the lug spaces then your headspace is probably just on the small side. It sounds like your ejector is also worn down if it won't eject the case.

>>32591823
Yes. I took apart the bolt.
I checked the chamber.
Maybe its headspace issues.
I'm wondering about the serial number?

>>32591645
Looks like someone wrapped something around the stock, everythings too uniform/straight

>>32592371
I read somewhere that some of the rifles were wrapped in paper after they're were put into crates, but I'm not sure if they did or not

File: 20170103_184814.jpg (837KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

837KB, 2560x1440px

Here's my Cossack next to the Fuddington 870 I got for Christmas.

Damn it feels good to no longer be a Noguns.

>>32591771
>02 stamp
>M53
Show pic of barrel shank. Pretty sure 02 is the Hungarian stamp. Could be a headspace issue as >>32591823 said, especially if bolt is mismatched. have you looked closely at the interruptor and ejector with the rifle out of the stock?

>>32592411
You read correctly, they did use a paper wrap, but I don't think that would create the stripes

After dinner ill bust out my nuggets
>m39
>tikka m91/30
>westinghouse m91
>fin cap 42 izzy
>type 53

>>32592449
>Cossack
Gonna need to see that Ka3 stamp friend.

>>32592460
Its Hungarian.
My camera sucks ass.
Bolt is matching.

>>32593385
Thought so. Hmm a lot of those are in really good condition still. For the extractor I would pull the rifle from the stock and check it out internally. I've pulled the interruptor on a Mosin and it isn't a big deal but avoid it if possible... but there could be something going on in that area regarding ejection. Take a closer look

>>32590857
it started life as a 1910/1909 carbine captured by the Austrian-Hungarian army given to the Germans and ended up in Poland. then in WWII captured by the Germans then captured back by the Russians and given to the Czechs and turned into a 91/38.

What does the "r" suffix in the year marking?
762x54r.net doesn't seem to have anything specific

>>32593867
means year

>>32593867
God/year

>>32593676
How do you know it started life as a carbine?

File: 1231161422_2.jpg (902KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

902KB, 2560x1440px

>>32581310
I tried this on last milsurp thread, but still need help. Numbers matching Hungarian m44 carbine. Soaked and scrubbed everything in clp, polished contact points, and taken all apart. No matter what I do the bolt is impossible to move when chambering or ejecting a round. Slightly harder when there's no round in as well. What do?

>>32593676
>>32594198
I am wondering as well about the first part of its history before it became a 91/38. Are we sure it is a 91/38, at this point I must ask. What is a 1910/1909 carbine? That is a Mosin I am not aware of. if it is a shorter M91 before 1930 then it should be a Dragoon(or Cossack but I don't know of any Ka3 that became a 91/38).
>Austria-Hungary
so it has the AZF stamp?
>given to Germany
plausible but unlikely
>ended up in Poland
how, exactly, do you have any evidence on this point?
>captured(again) by the Germans
>captured(again) by the Russians
>given to the Czechs
>given
I'm having a really hard time following this. That is a mosin with a more specifically storied history than my 91/30, which has a storied history no one will ever know...
>1912 Izhevsk M91
>Re-barreled by Tula in 1943 as a 91/30
>refurbished twice(apparently) with 2 [/] stamps
>all matching numbers, probably force matched at most recent refurb
Just saying... that is either the most maticulously documented Mosin in history, or a whole lot of presumptions which I can understand and follow, if you would provide what gives you these impressions. Still having a problem with 1910/1909 "Carbine" though.... explain please...

Also, what happened to 1914-1955?? Now it is 1910/1909???

>>32594492
I presume he means a Model 1907 carbine. Thing is, without the unique 1907 carbine sights there's no way to prove it ever was one.

>>32594534
Maybe. Weren't they legit carbines too? As in M38/M44/M9159 length? What's the unique sight on those, that rings a bell as the early carbines but they are pretty rare an so I haven't researched them on the pretense I'll likely never find one I can afford

>>32594534
Also, the whole capture and sale back and forth story. I'd be highly interested in how any of that can be substantiated as, far as I know, it cannot be. I'm no Mosin expert, but I like to think I've done my homework and know generally what I'm talking about with Mosins, save a few tidbits and exacts here and there(like exactly determining a 1907 carbine for example)

File: Soldiers_of_the_2nd_Riga_Latvian_riflemen_ regiment_machinegun_unit_1917_note_Mosin_M1907_carbines.jpg (717KB, 1172x956px) Image search: [Google]

717KB, 1172x956px

>>32595722
>Weren't they legit carbines too?
Yes.
>As in M38/M44/M9159 length?
Almost the same barrel length, yes.
>What's the unique sight on those,
It's a short, straight ladder that was hinged at the rear rather than at the front like the M91 infantry-length and M91 Dragoon/Cossack-length rifles.
http://www.mosinnagant.net/ussr/M1907-Carbine.asp

File: 20170109_224931.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

Gunsmith friend of mine just refinished the stock . What does k think?

>>32595899
>What does k think?
A woodworker he isn't; too much cosmoline and old shellac left in the grain of the wood and now it looks like it has stains. Should have sweated it out a bit longer before refinishing it.

>>32595941
Like you could do any better, hang yourself and livestream it on facebook faggot

>>32595823
Interesting. I remember seeing these and looking a bit into them, but they are quite rare as I recall and so I never went further on the assumption I'll likely not be able to find one at a good/affordable price. In any case, I've got my sights set on some rarer but obtainable Chatellerault, 1919 Tula and Ka3 Izhevsk Mosins for my collection

File: teenage_volunteers_in_the_White_Russian_Army_note_Mosin_M1907_carbine_Winchester_1895_rifle_and_Arisaka_carbines.jpg (214KB, 800x628px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 800x628px

>>32596004
Next time maybe don't ask for opinions if you can't handle negative ones.

>>32595899
>>32596004
>isn't my Mosin so good looking with refinished stock
No, not really...
>you can't do better hurr durr
really?

>>32581310
>owning a garbage rod
>2017
ISHYGDDT

>>32593462
Found mine in a dumpster.
What would I Look for? Should I get a new bolt head?

>>32596441
No, especially if all parts are original Hungarian. As another anon eluded to, does it cycle smoothly without a round? If so, as they also said, tight headspace.

Something else I encountered with my 91/59 is the firing pin depth. Check yours. I'm not quite sure why but when I first took my 91/59 apart I didn't set the firing pin depth exactly as it was, but dialed it back just a hair according to my Mosin tool measuring its penetration depth and for whatever reason this made the action extremely tight(with no ammo just cycling the bolt). After I put it back as it came to me, barely too much according to my tool, it cycled smoothly and perfectly again. I cant tell tell you why or that it is what's is wrong with your rifle, but it clearly caused an issue with mine somehow.

Check your interruptor, extractor and the depth on your firing pin. Reduce depth a hair or put it ***BARELY***past spec and try some more. Be careful though if you're pushing depth specs. Very careful!

>>32596565
Can't measure them. Pulled interrupter. No bolt is NOT stiff when empty only loaded.

>>32596565
To be clear, the issue appeared after dry fire for function check. It was fine if the bolt was opened/closed while cocked, but if I dry fired it was insanely stiff to open the bolt. The pin appeared too deep(barely) according to my tool, but dialing it back a hair created the stiffness issue. AGAIN this may not help you in any way and you need to be VERY careful playing with the firing pin depth, but it's an issue I discovered cleaning my rifle.

>>32596148
>I have never owned shot or touched a Mosin in my life, the post
Or
>I was stupid and bought the first and cheapest Mosin I couldn't find, and now ignore any rifle no matter how good can be shit in individual cases

File: 1474469413367.jpg (36KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 720x720px

>>32582572
>literally a rifle
>figuratively a meme
ftfy

>>32596663
Or a third option. Bought a garbage rod in 2009 for $50 shot it a bit realized mosin a shit then sold it to some slavboo for $175 two years later and bought an actually decent bolt gun in a relevant caliber.

>>32596617
Dry fire the rifle and see id the stiff issue presents.
>yes
Lessen the depth a tiny bit, try again
>no
It's not the same issue I experienced likely
>>32596663
Wow spell/grammar check fail
>I bought the cheapest Mosin I could find and now ignore that any rifle, even the best, can be shit on an individual basis.***
Sorry you have no ability to look beyond a small sample size or use good purchasing skills. Just to add to old post, yaknow

>>32596710
>$50
>2009
Case in point. Cheapest Mosin you could get.
>relevant caliber
At that time x54r was probably the cheapest center fire cartridge you could buy and surplus was plentiful. Want to know how I know you're a lying faggot? Because you're literally a lying faggot, or just turned 18 after following /k/ move from the Mosin as a cheap into guns to not worth it anymore unless collecting and you're just butthurt you missed out. Am I in the ballpark? Probably

>>32596722
I dry fired it.
No bolt issue. I think it is the interrupter.
I found the rifle in a retirement home dumpster.
Probably a battlefield pickup, rifle is beat to shit stock is cracked, finish is basically gone.
>Be Mosin.
>Fight in combat.
>Get captured.
>get kept for years.
>man dies.
> libshit family throws me in dumpster to die.
>/k/omrade finds me.
>cleans me up, trys to fix me.

>>32596877
Okay, next is going to be inspecting the interruptor and extractor. Figure out the ejection and feed issues. If no issue seems found there, start at the bolt next for the chambering issues you talked about. Really bolt or ejection/interruptor issues next doesn't matter but the ejection/feeding issues are More important to me so I would go there next.

Let me get one of my Mosins and get a good pic. I'll take it apart tomorrow and help you take yours apart more thoroughly if you really want but for now just pull it from the stock and look firm gunk and spring integrity, then let's move on

File: IMG_1185.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>32597274
The part my finger is on is the extractor and the Izhevsk(bow and arrow) stamped "tab" directly below is the interruptor for feeding. As I recall though it's been a while since I had one out of stock, they are one part, dove tailed into the receiver and I said a leaf spring. Check for gunk/integrity here for ejection issues. One problem at a time. If you want to fix it learn every part and what it does.

>>32597311
Correction, the ejector. Not extractor. Extractor is next place we will look though.