Can we all agree that the T72 is the best tank to ever see production?

>>32563806
It has the best killed ratio out of any late Cold War tank ever.

>>32563806
>Turret pops off to easily confirm kill

>>32563806
Advanced crew killing technology. Easy venting technology ensures 100% venting through crew compartment.

>>32563806
Its the absolute best. It ejects entire turret when it gets hit. Nothing throws higher than a T-72

>>32563806

Like all Russian gear, it is trash.

>>32563826
>>32563835
>>32563846
>>32563868
>>32563871
Is that your response? Really? All the effort I put into my post, and you respond with that ‘witty’ retort of yours? The passions and experiences of my life have been poured into ensuring my post was a masterpiece. You’re merely a peasant that can’t even begin to understand how my post was utter perfection. I bet you couldn’t even replicate even an iota of how great my post was. I laugh at the thought of how bewildered and overheated your brain must be for attempting to even begin to refute my post. Even if you went to Harvard and earned a Master’s in the study of my post, you would still lament your inability to learn the prophetic undertones of my post. But you know what? I pity you, since it is a tragedy you couldn’t appreciate my post. The experience could have changed you… made you a better man. Instead, you will remain the hollow shell of a man who could have received salvation. The anguish of you not being able to truly appreciate my post will haunt you to your grave.

File: CzJvlkWUAAAbGEF.png (864KB, 733x1100px) Image search: [Google]

864KB, 733x1100px

>>32563884
>salt flowing hard.
>staymad

File: image059.jpg (47KB, 578x434px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 578x434px

>>32563806
>>32563884

T-72 was pretty good when it first came out and it's still an entirely capable design so long as it doesn't encounter something fielded by NATO today.
Definitely not the best, but also far from the worst.

File: 3050266_1350905561051.42res_300_168.jpg (16KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 300x168px

>>32563884

File: dsfgsadfg.jpg (33KB, 533x354px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 533x354px

>>32563884

>>32563913
Every time I see this thumbnail I think its the Prism-Tank from Red Alert 2.

File: download.jpg (89KB, 700x537px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 700x537px

Bob semple is best tank ever, it doesn't need fancy blueprints that cause failures

>>32563806

Whilst it's well protected for its weight, it:

>can barely reverse, so it limits your defensive actions
>center mass charge location, meaning any hit there means you're entire crew is dead
>no focus on user friendly fire control
>no thermals for a long time

Nah, it's shit. Armor and gun (for the time) can only give you so many points.

File: 1481665138668.png (397KB, 639x904px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 639x904px

>>32564402
>Got sheet metal?
>Got a tractor?
>Got a few machineguns?

Congrats, you've got a tank!

>>32563884
>>32563806

I hole-hardedly agree, but allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go. Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like it’s a peach of cake.

File: very fast tank driving at incredibly high speed.jpg (415KB, 2000x1331px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 2000x1331px

>>32563806
Pretty much.

File: t-72b3 (4).jpg (471KB, 1200x799px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 1200x799px

>>32563935
>so long as it doesn't encounter something fielded by NATO today
And what if it's not an obsolete model fielded in the early 80s, but the actual modern T-72 variant that nothing NATO fields today has ever encountered? How are you going to measure that?

File: fried abrams.webm (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>>32563913

File: 200px-Marvin_Heemeyer.jpg (10KB, 200x198px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 200x198px

>>32564402
>>32565247

File: 1476405685398.jpg (368KB, 3000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 3000x3000px

>>32565252