WTF is this black tar looking shit in my red dot

Sealant squeezing out because you bought a shitty Bushnell. Send that shit back

>>32561168

Pretty much this

File: wtf2.jpg (73KB, 500x374px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 500x374px

looking at some other pictures looks like other people have the same shit

I bought this this several years ago, doubt I can send it back =/

Normal

Bushnell Trophy Red Dot TRS-25 3 MOA Red Dot Reticle Riflescope, 1x25mm (Matte),Colors May Vary https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00200E0HM/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_CdfCybSHYJ6EV

>>32561159
>>32561203
This makes me glad I didn't buy a Bushnell.

As for the Vortex 3x, I would just suggest you'd look at a Vortex Strike eagle if you're looking to get a more flexible optic. The 3 adds a decent amount of weight and has a VERY short eye relief, like no-to-charging-handle short. I still have mine set up with my red-dot, but I'm really considering buying a second 1-6 or 1-4

>>32561225
>By design, the LED light is secured to the inside of the scope with adhesive and may partially obstruct the 360 degree view

Holy shit Bushnell...

File: 15 - 1 (6).jpg (475KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 2048x1152px

>>32561159

i'd just ditch the bushnell and pick up an aimpoint pro or somethin

>>32561422
> get an aimpoint

yeah I mean I've got a T2 micro on another rifle and it is a nice red dot. But this Bushnell was like $75 vs $700 for an aimpoint. It is apparent the Aimpoint is built better than the Bushnell but +$625 better, I dunno

>>32561490
Primary Arms Advanced Micro Red Dot. I've had mine on my rifle for close to 2 years and it's been a tank.

>>32561530
looks decent, thx

>>32561159
Turn the red dot on and look from the muzzle side, its the laser housing. How do you think red dots even work?

>>32562681
>laser housing
>coated in black tar heroin