Autistic /k/ommando Question

>>32538306
What?

What are you asking? If it is accurate to depict the UN using an M9? Or if they are airshit? Shotgun looks real enough judging by the bore.

>>32538331
>>32538314
>Example:
Would the Boston Globe use a sawed off shotgun in a close quarters gunfight?

Would the white house dual wield meme pistols when trying to assassinate the president elect?

Can a 417 take ar10 mags?

>>32538543
I think it can take any 7.62 bullet clips

File: 1390878714707.jpg (56KB, 609x720px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 609x720px

>>32538306
who gives a fuck

it's just a picture of a bunch of props modeled after real guns so it's probably going to be very realistic
if it was a video or a game then there would be more to analyze but a realistic depiction of guns is not the point of the picture so why should you or anyone else give a fuck!

>>32538675
>props modeled after real guns
That's not how it works. Most film armorers use real firearms modified to fire blanks. Sometimes the modifications are temporary, sometimes they're not even modified (just handled extra carefully). Particularly enthusiastic actors sometimes bring their own firearms to be used on the set.

>>32538306
And then pic related became this :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXOcXvqZlXI

>EQUILIBRITRUMP

>>32538306
>Implying people from Taxachussetts own anything bigger than a .22

>>32538526
no there seems to be no correlation to choice of gun

>Half of the guns wielded by groups that know fuck all about guns still have their safeties on.

Yeah, seems accurate OP.

>>32538306
There's no correlation because this is a photoshop of a poster of John wick 2. Big Don is normally Keanu and there's no text.

>>32540798
that boston bomber guy's friend had an ok ruger though.

Had.