Was aesthetics one of the prerequisites for every nazi weapon?

>>32517434
Stukas look like fucking garbage, and so do most panzers.

File: 7316150122_bdca7a77b1_b.jpg (231KB, 683x1024px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 683x1024px

Wehraboo Alert!

>using the fg42 as an example for nazi '''''aesthetic'''

w e w l a d

The truth is, most German shit looks and works like garbage, and you're buying into Nazi propaganda if you believe otherwise.

File: The one true raifu.png (992KB, 900x481px) Image search: [Google]

992KB, 900x481px

>>32517434
>Not even posting the most aesthetic version of the FG42

File: 9624_3_6.jpg (135KB, 2250x919px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 2250x919px

>>32517434
Guns so ugly that they're beautiful thread?

File: SVT-40.jpg (71KB, 1022x243px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1022x243px

>>32517434
>this is not aesthetic

File: 539b8c58ef1f1063eac9e2c2accfeb63.jpg (79KB, 1200x779px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1200x779px

>>32517930
>this is not aesthetic

>>32517553
this.

>>32517553
hnnng

>>32517448
stukas look fucking badass you uncultured faggot

>>32517930
>>32517939
The are when they are given german designations
>7.62mm SIGw 259(r)
>MP717(r)

>>32517939
All shotguns are aesthetic though

>>32517553

horizontal magazines......

>shudders uncontrollably

>>32517939

Never understood why the russians replaced the ppsh41 with the inferior ppsh42.

File: emp442.jpg (89KB, 800x400px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 800x400px

>>32517434

>>32517559
gun beauty goes in a circle. Ugly, more ugly, most ugly, beautiful.

>>32520121
>horizontal magazines
It shortens up the weapon and removes any possibility of the magazine interfering with the ground when firing from prone. It was a weapon designed for paratroopers.

>>32520121
>Never understood why the russians replaced the ppsh41 with the inferior ppsh42.
Because it was far cheaper to produce, which is pretty damn important when you need to arm millions of men

File: Brandenbergers.jpg (164KB, 1000x656px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1000x656px

>>32517487
You bet your sweet ass

>>32520176

>interfering with the ground when firing from prone

Ehh, I think this is the correct answer
>>32520208

>>32520354

Blyat fascist invaders

File: 1480986925063.png (118KB, 522x441px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 522x441px

>>32520445
Commiecuck pls go

>>32520461

>ww2
>tens of millions of socialists killing eachother
>implying i'm communist

>>32517434
Is it because Hitler was an artist? Did he have high aesthetic standards.

>>32520445
>Eh, I think this is the correct answer
I'm not talking about the Soviet subgun. I'm talking about the German FG42 rifle. Try to follow the comment chain.

File: MP3008[1].jpg (8KB, 400x146px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 400x146px

>manage to make a sten copy that looks even uglier than the original

>>32520121
cause shooting the 41 on full auto is like trying to controll a firehose with your pinky

the 42 has better rate of fire and better recoil, plus its smaller (with the collapsible stock) wich makes it alot better in cqc

and it was cheaper to make

ITT : One man's beauty queen is another man's show pig.

File: 1462262488249.jpg (112KB, 1176x706px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1176x706px

While i agree that the germans had nice ships, the only ones who seemed to go full aesthetic on their ships was japan, just look at their shit, they were pieces of art even if in combat they were pieces of shit.

>>32517553
hhhuummmmmmmmmmmhh

>>32520015
this. ju87s are based, and ju88s also look great

>>32517939
ah... the ppsh... hell of a shotgun

>>32520121
Because the PPSH41 is kind of shit, magazines are finicky like a greased badger and the gun costs a lot to make, also the rate of fire isn't actually that nice to have.

The PPS43 was cheaper to make, lighter, and more dependable.

>>32520497
He didn't design any weapons, also his specialization was landscapes, which he was mostly mediocre or average in.

File: charles martel dreadnought.jpg (158KB, 1280x885px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1280x885px

>>32522716

>>32517930
P L U M B O L T
L
U
M

B
O
L
T

File: 246s67d.jpg (58KB, 744x425px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 744x425px

>>32527112
The Richelieu class was also a e s t h e t i c AF

File: M1 Garand history.jpg (593KB, 1355x995px) Image search: [Google]

593KB, 1355x995px

>>32517434
>How come russian and american weapons are all ugly.
OP is a fag.

>>32524307
How many .12 gages could you fit in that drum?
Looks like a real manstopper though, with the wood furniture it looks like a ruger shotty my grandpa owned.

>>32517930
That's the early AK right (the autoloading variant?)

>>32520074
PPSH heck of a shotgun

File: vining-2.jpg (122KB, 600x739px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 600x739px

>>32517448

Stukas look awesome you fucking subhuman

Panzers are also alpha-tier

You sound like a commie faggot

Vining himself has called for your death

>>32527112

That's a pre dreadnought you nigger

>>32527112
My fucking dick

>>32527581
no