Is he a reliable source of information regarding firearms?

>>32510878
haha memes, we like them here.
now got to bed lil johnny

No, go away.

>>32510878
Yes, but only for britbongs and children.

>>32510878
I mean he wondered why they didn't just pad the action of a Sten with felt to make it less noisy, so no.

>Is he a reliable source of information regarding firearms?
No, but a better question is, is /k/?

Why would a britbong be knowledgeable on firearms he can't even touch/look at let alone own?

>>32510878
No, his culture doesn't have the culture to be knowledgeable regarding firearms. All they know about firearms comes from American sources. Just look how they discuss about guns. They use American firearms terminology, expressions and idioms when speaking about them. Brits have an American accent when they speak about guns. Which is a shame.

>>32510878
>Is he a reliable source of information
No.

>>32510878
Pretty sure he used the newtons third law to say tripod mounted LMG's where more powerful than bipod LMG's. Like maybe IDK but its a fucking autistic thing to come up with.

>>32511305
>Brits have an American accent when they speak about guns.
Almost had me, but that part was just too over the top.

>>32511375
Well guess I should have put that in quotation marks.

His British biased is beyond retarded

File: bald hema man.jpg (75KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1280x720px

>>32511305
This is nonsense. While yes most British don't have a clue about firearms, the few ones that own guns are quite knowledgeable about them, like Matt Easton for example.

File: CUCK.jpg (339KB, 1000x557px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 1000x557px

>in fact, the Schmeisser was without a question the worst subgun of WW2
>that is why it never saw any use after the war

>>32510878
No. Love his content and is entertaining to watch. But no. Perhaps it is because he is in the land of Noguns or just to many anecdotes, but that is one of the things he consistently gets wrong.

>>32511431
>Matt Easton
>guns

Vague claims in YT vids aren't facts mate. ANd no, ME is not a good source of info on anything beside british +- victorian era mlitaria.

He's a very good speaker and has some interesting things to say on certain subjects, but you have to take everything he says with a pound of salt.

>>32513556
He's better when it comes to swordfighting than most people I guess. Most HEMA people aren't that good when it comes to guns.

File: ianbecrazynsheityo.jpg (17KB, 300x297px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 300x297px

>>32510878
He is good at manipulation and extorting Britbong ignorance.

>>32510878
Whenever some idiot Brit claims the L85A2 is better than any gun in NATO I imagine it's someone like this balding low testosterone birt cuck.

File: sanssalaire.png (45KB, 695x594px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 695x594px

I defer to Matt Easton over Lloyd anyday in regard to melee. There are some knowledgable shooting bongs like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbGoU-yx8YA

>>32511437
What video did he say this

>>32511437
why does he refer to guns with incorrect slang?
if you're reenacting or something, then yeah, use period slang
but for a technical or retrospective historical context? just use the fucking proper name
he did the same shit with the spandau video

>>32510878
>Youtubers ever being a reliable source of information.

Go to bed, kiddo.

>>32511305
if bongs were keen observers of American gun culture then they wouldn't be such pussies about guns.

>>32510878
hes a British nationalist. So, no. he will defend the shit out of British weaponry even tho British weapons have problems.

>>32515471
He does it to discredit the views of the opposing side. Anybody who points out the many flaws in his videos will either include the fact uses a term that doesn't fit the context of the video like Schmeisser or Spandau or be swamped by other comments that do. Then the reader of your argument dismisses your argument entirely because you complained about something that was technically correct, even if it shouldn't have been used in the first place, and considers your entire argument null or petty. It's a rather childish tactic, but unfortunately it tends to work on the internet.

>>32510878
no, he's not a good source on anything. He just makes shit up based on educated guesses.

>>32510878
No.