Is this legal in the U.S.? Is it any good?

good luck finding one.

>>32505607
Why wouldn't it be?

>>32505607
yes
for its time yes, compared to modern rifles for the same price no

also you won't find one anyway

>>32505622
Loads of guns are illegal in the US, pretty much any gun that the govt really fears, or that the is hugely better then its US counterpart and would rekt the US market at least in that field.

>>32505607
Yes.
We don't know, because there exist like 20 and none are for sale.

>>32505645
Illegal or heavily restricted?

>>32505651
There are a few that pop up once in a blue moon. I saw one that was priced at $35000 8 or 9 years ago.

>>32505645
Name 3.

>>32505607
Legal? Yes.
Though I heard they supposedly weren't that accurate (don't take my word for it though).

>>32505682
Not him but anything that requires a 'tax stamp'. In matters of state and subject potential power must be treated as actualized power.

>>32505969

please explain how the WA2000 could possibly require a tax stamp

>>32505979
That wasn't the tripfag's demand. The WA2000 is perfectly legal in free states.

>>32505950
They were super accurate for the time, where 1 MOA was considered laser-like.

>>32505645
There are no "illegal" guns in America. There are are guns banned from import, and there are NFA weapons.

How good is it compared to the PSG-1?

Closest you can get are kits to make a 10/22 look like one but last I looked those are around $900, which is still way cheaper than the real thing.

>>32505668

Earls has a .300winmag and a .308.

>>32506062
LMFAO... Are you just picking popular meme guns from last generation video games? Gonna ask about the steyr scout next? Maybe the FAMAS? How about the mk.23...

>>32505969
>Can be legally obtained
>Therefore it's illegal
Uh huh.

>>32506200
>Obtainment is at the whim of the state
>Legal

By this logic full autos are legal in the UK.

File: 1421678214196.jpg (58KB, 500x380px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 500x380px

>>32505969

>>32505607
Don't worry about them you won;t be able to get one and if one came available you couldn't afford it

>>32506157
>meme
>meme
>meme
Chill out autist, they're two cold war semi autos that have a reputation of notable accuracy. Not even that guy, but they're clearly comparable.

>>32506200
holy shit shut the fuck up
if theres a hoop i have to jump through its not fucking legal

>>32505645
No no. Not really.

File: Mittens sees a faggot.png (305KB, 400x504px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 400x504px

>>32506230
>he isn't aware of the difference between de facto and de jure law

>>32506253
You don't really understand the whole legal/illegal thing. Do you?

>>32506262
>In matters of state and subject potential power must be treated as actualized power.

Was this too abstract for you?

>>32506253
Then all guns are illegal, because you have legal barriers to ownership. Same with pretty much everything else.

>>32506341
Driving's illegal. Votings illegal. Living past 18 as a male is illegal.

>>32506341
There's a very clear difference between a requirement to, for example, display proof of age when purchasing something and a requirement for specific approval by the state to purchase something.

File: 1360361470468.gif (743KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

743KB, 500x281px

>>32506280
>still ignoring de facto law

>>32506374
I'm sorry, but wasn't it you that said
>>32506280
>In matters of state and subject potential power must be treated as actualized power.

You can be denied a purchase based on the legal whims of the state, therefore it's illegal.

>>32506404
I guess I'll have to make a clearer distinction.

Case A: People under the age of 21 are prohibited from buying alcohol. Anyone above the age of 21 may purchase alcohol at the discretion of the vendor.

Case B: Individuals must petition the state for permission each time they wish to purchase alcohol.

Naturally the state, as states are wont to do, retains power in both circumstances but there is a clear limit based on the rule of law in the first example - therefore a reasonable person may expect not to be denied the sale of alcohol provided he meets the clearly defined requirements known beforehand. The second example is obviously different and represents a clear breakdown in rule of law - a person can not know with any degree of certainty if he will be allowed purchase of alcohol because each purchase must be preceded by supplication and each time it may be denied without process or recourse. Fall out of favor with the local commisar? Good luck buddy!

File: Shitpostengage.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>>32506157
>asks a question expecting a reasonable answer
>Instead get a massive sperg out as a response

I asked because they're both slated to be semi-auto precision sniper rifles from around the same time period and price range you massive retard.

>>32506530
>a person can not know with any degree of certainty if he will be allowed purchase of alcohol because each purchase must be preceded by supplication and each time it may be denied without process or recourse
Except you are wrong. While the process is lengthy and in many ways arbitrary, should you complete it you have a reasonable assumption that your purchase will not be denied. Additionally, you do have recourse in multiple ways. They cannot deny you without proper cause and you have the right to know what it is.

>>32505607
>legal>
why wouldn't it be?
>is it any good?
well, there's not much we can do to test it out considering there's 12 in the US, and one asshat owns 9 of them.

>>32506062
For starters or, at least in theory,0 the WA2000 a bit handier, because it's a bullpup, shorter and lighter than the PSG1, while retaining the same barrel length.

>>32506713
>one asshat owns 9 of them

Top kek. At least someone will die happy.

>>32506157
Settle down sperglord

>>32506007
And now $400 will get you a 1 MOA rifle from a rack of 50 more just as accurate.

>>32506253
I guess cars, buying a home, and starting a business are all illegal now, guys.

>>32505607
legal, but hard as fuck all to find and insanely expensive when you do find one.

>>32505607
leagal? yes
Good? not as good as you want it to be

disclaimer: im basing this on internet hearsay and nothing more, i was disappointed when i heard it wasn't as amazing as i thought.