Do wood grips look good on stainless guns?

File: zX9tAe4.jpg (190KB, 1600x1071px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1600x1071px

>>32473771
>>32473778
You fucking know it does.
Especially Sigs.

File: beretta.jpg (32KB, 533x386px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 533x386px

>>32473804

I don't think so, Sigs are okay, but Beretta's... they look the best in such a configuration. I don't own one, but I've been trying to get pic related.

>>32473833
Get the trident instead of the peanut butter logo.

Also regularly polish it or it will look dull. Plus the frame doesn't match the slide under sunlight.

Rosewood looks great. Lighter stains look cheap imo

>>32473833
Beretta are ugly no matter what

No matter what they will remind me of failure and unreliability

File: 003.jpg (742KB, 1382x777px) Image search: [Google]

742KB, 1382x777px

>>32473771
Yeah

Dammit now I want wood grips for my Witness Elite Match.

>>32473877
Lemme guess, your only experience with Berettas is burnt out well-past-service-life M9s in the Army?

File: 1006 S&W.jpg (53KB, 634x425px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 634x425px

>>32473771
For a more polished and shiny stainless, sure.

For those matted, beadblasted surfaces, I don't think it'll look quite as nice.

>>32473877
>slappers only

File: IMG_0342 (1).jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

I think they look fine, even on crap turkish clones

Wood looks good on anything

>>32473771
>I can't even form an entirely subjective opinion on my own.
>I like guns.
Fuck off.

>>32476692
Except a girl

>>32473804
>>32473833
They both look like shit.
I bet you guys think Parachute Pants are totally "fly" too right?

File: 1434659815736.jpg (67KB, 400x504px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 400x504px

>>32480457
>he doesnt wear parachute pants