What would you pay?

How much do you want?

$10

File: WY.gif (814KB, 300x266px) Image search: [Google]

814KB, 300x266px

$11 and half a bag of doritos.

>>32455522
maybe like $600

the market is pretty saturated with ar15/ar-like firearms right now

$12 and a party sized bag of COOL RANCH doritos

$6 and 3/4ths of a bag of frozen tendies.

>>32455522
400-500 dollars.

>>32455522
>I put n dollars into it

That doesn't mean shit bud, it's still a used polymer-receiver trash gun, except now it's only strong point (aesthetic) is gone. I'll give you 200 for it.

>>32455522
I'll give you a box of assorted powdered vitamins, enough to last you probably ten years, $20 and a lightly used Ninja blender.

File: Y2IuanB.jpg (72KB, 1280x620px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1280x620px

$20 in walmart coupons, a goat and a toblerone, but you have to answer in the next 10 mins.

>>32455522
I'll give you a tip for free: lose weight, fatty.

>>32455522
No more than 300-400. Like others have said you can get a new AR15 for around 500-600 right now. The SU-16 was originally marketed as a cheaper AR alternative. With ars being so damn cheap now there's not a niche for one anymore. nobody really cares about the accessories you put on it. Its like a used car buy, You go by blue book value not how much the previous owners aftermarket radio is.

I'll give you $13.69 and the rest of my BBQ Pringles

>>32455522
450-ish, give or take.

>>32455709
No op buts that's a fuckin bargain

>>32455755
>>32455610
>>32455586

Way too much. 300 tops. You can get a new AR15 for like 550 now. No more reason for a SU16 to exist

>>32455522
If you live in PA I'll give you $250 or a 10/22 for it. I've been meaning to try making an aluminum SU-16 receiver.

Basically what everyone else has already said. 350 tops. You have what is functionally an AR15 but worse in every way. The SU16 lacks parts commonality, requires ugly Phillips screws to mount a collapsible stock, and is made by a company with a shoddy track record in quality control. Your paint job also makes it less appealing to a potential buyer. I know you say you have 700 dollars into the gun but that really doesn't mean shit for what people are willing to pay for it.

File: 20160818_094534.jpg (1MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1836px

I think its better than an AR-15 for the same price. Its piston driven, just a piston upper for AR cant be had for less than $600. Sure its polymer, but ive had no reliability issues. I had planned on stripping the paint job prior to sale. And to the keyboard warrior who called me fat, take a look in the mirror drumstick. Im 6ft2 225lbs and i eat shitstains like you for breakfast

>>32455522
$200 if i was desperate, but in reality i would never own a keltec unless i had great health insurance to cover the facial surgeries after it blows up in my face

oh yeah you can buy a brand new AR15 for $500 now, so why would someone buy a keltecnade ?

>>32456890

I benched 300 lbs today fatty. Bring it. :)

>>32455522
I have the .22 version in OD green, paid $500 nib for it.

File: shit for (((breakfast))).jpg (12KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 480x360px

>>32456890
you eat shit? for breakfast?

>>32456922
But find a piton ar for less than $800

>>32456890
it looks like shit. your mods did not add value it decreased it. 400ish is a realistic used price

>>32456929
You planning on bench pressing him while he pounds your boipucci

>>32456890
Although if that is your height and weight you don't have a lot of musclemass with that beer belly.

>>32456958
You act like your rifle is worth $800 though, which it isn't. If someone wants to purchase a piston driven AR, they are usually not going to want a Kel-Tec. Especially your Kel-Tec.

>>32457104
I get that the coloration is shitty, but all these guys discounting its price just due to that is dumb. The 2 most common mods for an su-16 are the ar stock and quadrail, $300 value. That does count for something.

>>32457800
lol ar stocks can be bought for 15 bucks and a quad rail for 30 bucks

>>32457929
The ar stock kit is $100 and the stock with the bumper pad was $35. Quad rail ran me close to $160.

Honestly $385 would be what I'd pay top dollar. Not because I don't think it's worth more but that's what it's worth to me.

>>32457800
your mistake is thinking the quad rail adds value. if it was worth anything you would remove it from the gun reinstall the original furniture and sell it seperatly. as it is now you painted it so its worthless to anyone who actually wants one. its bundled with the gun and adds nothing to the price.

>>32455522
>paying to take someone's garbage

That's not how it works friend
But for real, post it on armslist and ask for slightly below average pricing. You'll have it off your hands tomorrow.

>>32457021
>You planning on bench pressing him while he pounds your boipucci

I'd like to see that acrobatic reverse cornhole and I'm not even gay.

>>32455709
>a goat
actually pretty good, I'd take it

Is that a backwards AK rail? WTF?
You wrecked that gun, nigger.

>>32456957
Youre my hero

>>32455522
I'd make you pay me to take it. What an abomination

>>32456890
Come on man...Don't let the trolls get to you. You posted a picture of yourself; deal with the backlash. If you don't like the criticism, get into shape. I'm not ripping on you.

As for your weapon... You're gonna take a loss. If I was an ffl I wouldn't give you more than 400. I would sell it for 500.

To most of us that aren't new to guns, keltec is a time bomb.

>>32455522
>hey guys, I turned my SU16 in to a lookalike AR completely negating the main points of the SU16's existence

>>32459195
Well op also got mentally stuck. Buy something cheap but dump money into it. This is why im picky about my guns. I believe OEM should be a reliable minimum if that's all one can afford.

Kel-tec is a mall ninja company.

>>32455522
How much you want for that spare tire?