who here /snubnose.357/?
>>32405464
enjoy your shitty velocity
seriously for concealability barrel length isn't even that big of a deal you might as well have a 4 inch barrel if the frame and grip are small
>>32405572
>not wanting a legal flamethrower
>give your target 3rd degree burns and a .38 bullet
>>32405464
That's not a Glock.
Ruger SP101. I think it's a 2 - 2 1/2" barrel. I love it.
I love the versatility of .357/.38
I love how loud it is
I love that it's a wheel gun
>tfw no colt python .357 ;__;
>>32405641
And?
Snub-nosed anything is so fucking ugly
It makes any cartridge into an anemic 22lr. So its ugly mechanicaly also
>>32405648
All I know is that Glock doesn't make revolvers. I reckon that says about everything that needs to be said. Let me know when you're ready to start taking your personnel defense seriously, kid.
I want to get a S&W 360, but it's very expensive.
>>32405464
Cute.
How much do colt detective specials go for these days?
>>32405828
Old Colt prices depend greatly on condition. If you just want a decent shooter with good lockup they can still be found for around $400 easily.
>>32405464
This is my dream revolver.
S&W 627 pc. One Day. .
>>32405828
I wouldn't advise getting a Detective Special if you plan on carrying it. It's a great gun, but:
1.) It's not rated for +P. The claim that any all-steel gun can handle +P with no problem because "modern ammunition isn't loaded as hot!" is pure fuddlore that results in parts breakage or, in some cases, cylinders actually blowing up.
2.) It can't be easily replaced if it finds its way into a police evidence locket and magically disappears.
3.) The parts for it are becoming increasingly harder to find.
4.) Modern Colt will not do warranty work on it.
5.) It's nearly impossible to work on it yourself. Something like a Smith and Wesson is easy to handle if you have a shop manual and aren't a lardass with fat neckbeard hands, but a Colt? Even most actual gunsmiths aren't qualified to work on them. Good luck not messing anything up if you haven't been trained by an old school Colt armorer.
>>32407898
>It's not rated for +P. The claim that any all-steel gun can handle +P with no problem
I meant to say here "The claim that any all-steel gun can handle an INDEFINITE amount of +P with no problem"
50 rounds of +P is probably alright. Even 500 rounds of +P might still be okay. 5000 rounds of +P? Your gun, and possibly your hand, upper chest, and face, will have a problem.
>>32405464
I was, but I sold it.
>>32407956
Did you want just more capacity, or was it because .357 sucks to shoot out of tiny guns?
God damn I want one of these. Anyone have any recommendations?
>>32406040
>lock
>>32408079
Can i get a dump of all of these?
>>32408079
Reccomend you to stop avatar fagging with this shit.
>>32405572
Barrel length is very important for conceivability if you appendix carry, which is really common with snub nose revolvers. Anything longer than 3 inches will crush your balls to oblivion every time you sit down. Maybe I'm just too skinny for appendix carry though.
>>32408120
I think by the end of 2017 I will have finished sharing the nearly 1,500 Claire webms. here is a rare never before seen Claire for u.
>>32408168
Plz send link. I will be forever in your debt.
>>32408079
You're asking for a snubnose revolver recommendation?
>>32408068
Neither.I bought it with intentions of it replacing my carry gun, but I could never bring myself to switch. Time come when I needed some cash, so away it went. I actually loved shooting it, and was pretty accurate with it as well.
>>32408168
Also you posted this in another thread
>>32408333
What's your carry gun?
>>32408355
Steyr M9-A1
>>32408336
ye but i posted it here first
>>32408304
look on /gif/ about half a year back. there are some threads there. best i can do bud
>>32405645
>he doesn't have an extra 4k laying around for a Colt Python
>>32406040
Ruger has something that might be right up your alley with no Clinton lock
http://www.guns.com/2016/12/22/ruger-brings-new-caliber-options-to-revolver-line-videos/
>>32408423
Internal lock, no thanks.
>>32408394
Thanks, did you collect them individually or did you dl 1 big rip?
>>32408666
painfully collected
>>32408681
God bless, make a megaupload for me one day anon-kun :3