Will Russia ever join the S-Duct master race with the United

>>32393992
Don't they have to join the monocrystal third stage turbine blade first ?

File: P D E.jpg (9KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 225x225px

>>32393992

fuck this

> im going with pulse detonation engines
> literally riding on the thrust of a gatling gun

>>32393992
No, because they will only ever create C-ducts

File: wzd50%2627.jpg (119KB, 1000x459px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1000x459px

>>32393992

Well for that to happen they would have to improve their engines first.

File: Doughnuts_Rope_350.jpg (12KB, 350x413px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 350x413px

>>32394134

>Implying they haven't been in service for 20+ years.

File: su-47 (3).jpg (58KB, 990x637px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 990x637px

>>32393992
But it already did.
>>32394090
How about first you join non-shitposting master race.
http://www.npo-saturn.ru/index.php?sat=23

File: 1479698562693.jpg (201KB, 1065x635px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 1065x635px

>>32394476

File: i can't believe.png (62KB, 400x734px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 400x734px

>>32394134
>literally BRRRRRRT as a form of propulsion

>>32394476
>already did

pic unrelated, obviously. it's already been well established that the Su-47 did not have s-ducts and merely had curved intakes just like the F-111 and not even on the level as the Draken

>>32394645
Well established by the colloquium of butthurt /k fatniks in denial.

>>32394679
You're always welcome to post an image of the intakes to prove it's an s-duct. Until then, there is zero evidence for it having s-ducts and Russia still has never produced a production fighter with them. :^)

>>32394710
You're always welcome to post an image of the intakes to prove it's not an s-duct. Until then, there is zero evidence for it not having s-ducts and chassis and weapons bays disappearing into another dimension, as opposed to crossing the ducts' section :^)

>>32394722
Burden of proof is still on you, you claimed that it did have them.

I know logic is difficult for vatniks to grasp, but please, do try to keep up.

File: web.jpg (476KB, 1400x933px) Image search: [Google]

476KB, 1400x933px

>>32393992
>Will Russia ever join the S-Duct master race with the United States, China, Japan, Britain and France?
this is S duct

>>32394722
>>32394679
>>32394476
hahahaha commie sympathizing retard

File: 1473253428854.jpg (18KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 400x400px

>>32394679
>fatniks

>>32394726
Burden of proof is still on you, you claimed that it didn't have them and hence that chassis and weapons bays disappear into another dimension, as opposed to crossing the ducts' section.

I know logic is difficult for fatniks to grasp, but please, do try to keep up.

>>32394797
>vatniks actually think that acting like a child and repeating people is how to argue

So do you have an image to prove yourself or what?

>>32394679
>>32394722
>>32394797
This vatnik "logic" is the reason people make stuff like >>32394502

>>32394836
>Fatnik actually thinks I will waste any effort on his poor childish denial and demagogy
So do you have an image to prove yourself or what?

>>32394881

You can keep the tennis match going, but everyone else can see that you're UNABLE to prove that the S-ducts exist.

File: 343.jpg (10KB, 200x211px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 200x211px

>>32394881
>demagogy
>resorting to falling back on words you don't know the meaning of in an effort to insult others

God damn s-duct shit posting is getting as bad as Iowa shitposting.

>>32394902
Hey it works for democrats, right?

>>32394881
>demagogy
About 90% when i read this word on the internet it is from another vatnik sperging out.

>>32393992
What for? They are on awesome side along with Black Widow and F-15SE. Boeing managed to reduce frontal RCS of giant twin engine fighter to the f-35's level. Without using meme-ducts.

File: F-23_2_zps2c05dd5b.jpg (60KB, 491x146px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 491x146px

>>32395002
The YF-23 did have them though.

File: 1482342888420.jpg (37KB, 491x146px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 491x146px

>>32395206

>>32394951
Funny, isn't it?

>>32393992
Not at the current rate