battle rifles

>>32357560
Missing a rear sight there

>>32357560
It's missing the rear sight. If you still want it just be sure to pick up a rear sight, unless you plan on using optics on it.

File: 2016-09-25 15.02.08.jpg (290KB, 2550x712px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 2550x712px

I built my FAL but DSA makes good shit. Do it and get yourself a humpback stock instead of that gay straight comb shit.

File: Enterprise_Arms_Israeli_FAL_shoot.jpg (121KB, 919x1377px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 919x1377px

>>32357560
If that's an SA58 Standard then it sounds like a good trade. If it's an SA58 Voyager then don't do it. Is the actual rifle in question in the pic?

>>32357560
The SA58 isn't great compared to an Arsenal SLR104. I wouldn't make that trade.

File: 2390358.jpg (95KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 1200x675px

>>32358536

here is said rifle in question after picture found

it has magshit stock and leupold 3-9x40 lr scope

i am skeptical of it's condition and cannot identify if its a voyager or not and apparently the owner cant either

>>32359357
well if anything you could probably sell the leupold for a couple hundred bucks

>>32359357
If it has a carry handle cut on the receiver and a bi-pod cut on the barrel it's not a Voyager. Looks like a good deal.

>>32358518
Ive been thinking about doing a build, how hard is it?

>>32359357
That's not a Voyager, the deal is worth it