Aimpoint vs EoKek

Eotech is better

File: pg210_s_logo_.jpg (67KB, 1200x871px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1200x871px

>>32320735
Valday

>>32320765
>Valday
Valdai* u fuckingcuck

>>32320744
>>32320765
trash

nothing compares to aimpoint

Neither. Rifle is fine.

>>32320765
Wtf is that monstrosity?

>>32320765
This looks horrible compared to OPs pic.

>>32320735
Functionality? Aimpoint aimpoint aimpoint.

Aesthetics? Eotech. They just look cool.

>>32320765
What is this a sight for ants?

>>32321036
>Aimpoint.
Trash.
>EOTech
Wide veiw/FAST target acquisition. The REASON you have a reflex optic.
>but EOTech breaks.
If you are in the military yes. Civilian no.

>>32321355
Wrong.

>>32321355
>if you are in military yes. Civilian no.
What did he mean by this?

Also Eotech a shit. They knowingly sold a faulty product. They only offered a replacement plan once they were found out. Fuck 'em.

>>32320744
>>32321355
>Eotech

Enjoy your soon to be out of business company that sells faulty trash.

>>32321477
Once Vortex drops their reasonably priced holographic sight, they're toast

File: 1481706572938.jpg (14KB, 493x500px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 493x500px

>>32320735
>tfw astigmatism and all rds reticules look like this
I..I..It's okay, I like prism sights b..b..better anyways

have used all of these,several different models,overseas and home, at one time they were pretty even,more of a personal choice rather than which was best. now though eotec has gone way down hill over the last 5 yrs,and the fact they covered up a major flaw(that we all knew about cause we were using the fucking things)that put military personnel in danger i wouldnt have anything to do with them no matter how good the product. now a days i use a meprolite m21 reflex,works great,been around for a long time,cost around the same as the entry models of the others.

File: 14816654879790.jpg (89KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 960x540px

>>32320765
this nigga know what up
>Aimpoint reliability and battery time
>eotech ergonomic
the best combat optic today

>>32321812
thank you for your service

>>32321845
>2 vodka has been deposited into your vodka account

File: DSC00372.jpg (540KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

540KB, 2048x1536px

>>32321855

>>32321735
Whats the reticle gling to look like? Do we know anything besides its going to cst 800

>>32321845
How is an aimpoint unergonomic? For that matter how is a eotech ergonomic? Do you hold your fucking rifle by the optic?

>>32320735
EOTech a shit

>>32321355
>Wide view
all red dots have a wide view, you shoot with both eyes open
>FAST target acquisition
is this not something any red dot can do?
>>but EOTech breaks.
>If you are in the military yes
Thanks for proving the point that EOTechs have nothing over Aimpoints and they break.

File: IMG_20161015_142632.jpg (3MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x3120px

I fucking love my aimpoint.

File: blackfire.png (115KB, 301x373px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 301x373px

>>32320735
Only thing that annoys me about the eotech is it leaks that gas over time causing fogging and there is no way to prevent this.

Aimpoint is a over priced red dot hyped up by people who hate American companies. This is why I go with Trijicon and Nightforce.

>>32322038
so the aimpoint pro
other than it's battery life and size, is it the most value for the price in aimpoint's line up?

>>32322089
Nightforce makes red dots?

>>32321776
Same here.

I can still shoot fine with basic RDS though, the dot becomes a football but it doesn't make a huge difference at RDS ranges. Eotechs are completely unusable though.

If I wanted a red dot I'd buy from india

>>32321776
>>32322435
Well fuck i might have astigmatism. Every red dot ive looked through is mostly a circle but theyve all got a little tail. I figured my glasses were just messing it up


does this mean im inelligible for eye surgery now? Would my optometrist tell me or mark it on my prescription? Fuck i hate people who can just see normal

>>32321355

enjoy your 12" winter time moa shift

>>32321891
Literally go look on their website you dunce.

>>32322457
It's usually marked on your prescription, the astigmatism number will be "CYL."

It's usually not an issue for eye surgery unless it's really severe. Mine is bad enough to make some kinds of surgery impossible but not others, and also to make contacts impractical (I could get them but they have to be custom made hard glass contacts that are uncomfortable and only fit in one orientation), but that's pretty uncommon.

>>32321985
Eotech window is bigger
so it is more ergonomic

Either. The XPS fixed the old Eotech battery issues.

Eotech's are better for speed, but unless you're rich or in the military an Aimpoint is going to last longer with basically the same performance.

File: eoKEK.jpg (79KB, 337x714px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 337x714px

>>32321866
top

>>32322038
Drebin give you that rifle?

>>32322031
actually, eotechs have a better cco capability with night vision than aimpoints because they render more clearly under it. also,
>winter time shift
nigga, I'm not really, operating, and I'm damn sure not doing it in 50 below, or 160, so I think I'm good.

File: FB_IMG_1479325693779.jpg (24KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 720x720px

>>32320735
Aimpoint, unless you're just trying to look like a "super tacticool 2operator4u" fag, the Aimpoint tromps all over the EoTech in terms of functionality,

>>32320744
>>32321355
>pic related

>>32320807
Quit shilling, they're not THAT good.

>>32320765

Ewwww....

How good is it though?

>>32321355

You have no clue what the fuck you're talking about

>>32322642
But eotechs are not faster.

>>32322468
Had an EOTech 512 for 4 years now. Been using it consistently in the hot Missouri summers and cold winters. Has never lost 1 MOA of zero the entire time.

>>32322354

One can't ever let reality get in the way of their shitposting, son

File: EOTech-512-POV-through-scope-HolographicSightGuide.com_.jpg (30KB, 295x384px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 295x384px

>>32322456

> Indian dot

>>32323105
>muh anecdotes

I bet you're the one guy who bought an I.O. AK that lasted 5000 rounds with "no hiccups".

>>32322468
>got to Iraq then Antartica then back to Iraq again without zeroing your weapon
>slight shift in zero
Wow 0/10 would not use

>>32323211
No such luck friendo. Bought the optic before L3 came clean about the zero shift flaw. Likely won't buy another because of that revelation, but I love the sight I have an it's been nothing but rock-solid over the years with consistent use. Just sharing some real world experience instead of some biased fanboy shitpost that /k/ is used to.

>>32323187
laughed out loud

>>32322089
Well maybe American companies should get their shit together and actually put out quality products that don't blow up or break.

>>32323223
>Thinking the desert is hot 24/7

What about the trijicon rx01?

File: Gt+starts+off+just+presenting+the+facts+gt+uses+reasonable+_3981d649e40276a37ce78a39fb7957dc.jpg (19KB, 326x316px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 326x316px

>>32323088
>quit shilling, they're not that good

WRONG

>>32323558
He's right tho.

They're not the best but they are most definitely one of the better optics available.

>>32323223
>go outside in common -30 winter degree weather
>gun shoots off human size target a full half foot at 100m
>0/10 would not use

What's the point of having red dots over some good iron sights ?

>>32321477
M8 they are owned by L3 and they aren't going out of business any time soon

>>32323726
much faster, easier target acquisition, improved night ops capabilities

>>32323726
You don't have to line up two posts, all you have to do is shoulder, aim the reticle wherever and fire.

And then you have a wider range of view than many iron sight set ups, easier to use at night, and they're just all around easier to use than most iron sights.

>>32320735
all these peasants not using glorious ACOGmasterrace

>>32323320
You're mom is hot 24/7, what's you're point? Your a fag.

>>32323726
>Muh tacticool

>>32321355
How long does an eotech battery last? just checked my aimpoint, its still on. Left it in the closet in july.

>>32325474
0.1 years (1000 hours) continuous on. Aimpoint lasts 3 years continuous on.

>>32323187
>Gives a whole new meaning to "Drop compensating reticle"

Aimpoint.
Literally bomb proof reliability, amazing battery life (5 years), multitude of options to choose from - Entry level all the way up to IR capability military issue type stuff.
For those of you who spout such nonsense as "wider view" - Do you even both eyes open? This is how you're supposed to use red dots.

File: muhsbr.png (2MB, 1568x819px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1568x819px

>>32322038
I too, love my Aimpoint.

File: susat.jpg (53KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1024x768px

>>32320735
Neither.

SUSAT master race.

>>32326627
Disgusting

>>32320765
that thing is built like a tank. in fact, I bet you could run a tank over it and it wouldn't even scratch.

anyway, it's better than super-expensive aimpoint and eotech.

SO MUCH MISINFORMATION IN THIS THREAD
Holy fuck you kids are retarded.
Spec Ops wouldn't use EOtech if they were anything but the best on (or off) the market
Fucking poorfags trying to justify their aimpoint garbage because they can't figure out hoe to use EOtechs. I get it, it has more than 1 button on it, that just makes you retarded not the design.
L3 communications literally did nothing wrong. The issues reported were widely overblown and did not affect functionality.
>Aimpoint shills BTFO

>>32320735

I had Eotech for years and while I never had delamination problems, my zero would wonder in the Las Vegas heat. My problems went away with Aimpoint. But anecdotal experiences aside, you can find a brand new Aimpoint pro with mount on Amazon for $400. That's 3 years of always on, brick shit house durability 2 moa dot that simply cannot be beat for the price.

I haven't had any issues with my Vortex Spitfire prism

>>32321355
Pre-2015 Eokek fanboys:
>MUH SOF
>MUH OPERATOR
>YOU KNOW THEY'RE GUD IF TEH MILITARY USES THEM

Post-2015 Eokek fanboys:
>STOP PRETENDING TO BE OPERATOR!
>YOU'RE A CIVILIAN, YOU'LL NEVER HAVE ANY OF THE ISSUES THE MILITARY HAD!
>MUH FIELD OF VIEW

>>32321477
>>32321735

As someone pointed out they are owned by one of the huge defense contractors. The losses they may have incurred from the sight debacle are basically equivalent to a rounding error on their balance sheet.

>>32326704
for once hunter isn't the BIGGEST faggot in existence, specops would more likely use ELCAN in my opinion, they survive feed tray covers, if they can survive the feed tray on a MG, they can survive anywhere. that or they use other high end optics depending on their needs, magnification, or lack of. I know an operator who started using the mk17 to put hajjis down in fewer hits, he got a kill at 600 with iron sights.

>>32327291
>Hunter is one person
Its a meme dude
If it was really him there would be 30 Hunters

>>32326627
Your raifu a shit

>>32325072
This

ACOG is best COG

>>32327891
I like acogs but the eye relief is super short. Whats up with that

>>32322354
>>32322089
>not getting a zeiss RDS
>pls

>>32322038
Where's your operator you fag

>>32323716
yeah shame the pre-exps series were the only ones with the problem.
but you knew that, right? you weren't just parroting memes from /k/ without ever actually touching an EOtech, right?

fuck off nogunz faggot

>>32326704
>>32326768
Samefag

>>32327291
Do us a favor and an hero

>>32320735
I was in the same boat 6 months ago. Aimpoint is much better than eotech. With the Aimpoint pro that I got I can leave it on for 3 years without changing the battery. On a go to gun for home defense the red dot should be on, you might not have time to turn on the eotech. If you are rich you can get the Aimpoint comp m4 that has an 8 year battery life. I would post a pic but im working at the fun shop and can't figure out how to upload a picture on my phone.

File: NakedGun.jpg (15KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 400x300px

>>32323005
?

>>32328504
This guy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6JU5t2bpHg

Bushnell trs 25

>>32320765

Where can I throw my money to get one?

>>32328378
Yea and herein lies my problem. My bedside gun in my glock 21SF with tac light and night sights, that's if I don't have anough notice to grab the DDM4 V9 LW with ACOG and tac light I have leaned in the corner.

This is a new M4gery that I may outfit with KAC railz at a later date for dat dere SOPMOD look but I may keep it basic, already threw the stolen valor BUIS on there and zeroed it cause I don't have a carry handle. It needs a sight or carry handle cause just a back up iron looks gay and makes no sense.

I'm thinking the aimpoint pro would look good but so would the eotech 512. If this gets used it would be with notice so the leaving the sight on is not a huge selling point though the battery life is definitely a bonus I think the larger reticle would be better suited for this build of a light weight loaner rifle for operating operationally at the range or if SHTF.

Do the new 512/518s have issues or just the old ones?

>>32320735
>Eotech
Enjoy your delamination and failing company.

>>32327304
>If it was really him there would be 30 Hunters
I saw the faggot flag and came as fast as I could.

The best optic is my TruGlo that I got with my savings at Target, the most /k/ store ever. It has a big field of view, a bright dot, and it fits on the pictinny rail on my Echo1 M4.

File: IMG_1943.jpg (828KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]

828KB, 1536x2048px

>>32328969
Pic related. You can tell from the vortex flash hider and Kryptek sling I'm not going for 100% authentic look though it is a colt M4 upper, colt side mounted sling swivel and spikes M4 lower.

File: RX01NSN_additional_popup_1.jpg (16KB, 575x377px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 575x377px

What do you people think about the Trijicon RX01?

>>32321477
>L3
>going out of business

bitch you're dumb as FUCK.

>>32323088
>he Aimpoint tromps all over the EoTech in terms of functionality,
you're a dumb fuck.

>>32329560
shit.

Same with RX30.

source: I own the following:

2x MRO, 2x Aimpoint T1, 1x RX30, 1x SRS, 1x Leupold LCO, 1x RMR. These are just the red dots.

>>32327082
This. These idiots think L3 even gives a fuck about the money they lost in the Eotech issue. Do any of you even know how much shit L3 sells to the military?

>>32329624
What makes it shit?

>>32326704
>L3 didndu nothin, he a good boy

>>32320735
Aimpoint unless you have really bad astigmatism.

File: 1479515864542.jpg (39KB, 341x411px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 341x411px

>>32321355

> Aimpoint trash

You know how I know you are full of shit?

File: Zootopia-Nick-Wilde.jpg (286KB, 1500x1125px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1500x1125px

>>32320807
>>32321036
>>32321367
>>32321477
>>32321411
>>32322031
>>32322038
>>32322468
>>32323088
>>32323558
>>32325744
>>32326933
>>32328378
>>32330807
Aimpoint is overpriced garbage.
>Made in Sweden.
Enjoy funding Muslim rape gangs!
>Overpriced.
Other company's make just as good reflex optics at 1/2 the price.
>1/2 of the view of an EOTech
Enjoy being cucked out of view.
>Shit reticule.
ONLY 2 MOA DOT.
>Shit interface.
Just a fucking knob, no tactile/indication of brightness.
>Shit NVG compatibility.
Sucks at nvg work.
>Fuck huge sight.
WHY SO BIG?
>Shit water depth.
15ft HAHAHAHAHA!
>STILL USED BY DELTA/SEALS/USMC.
Real operators use EOTech.
Enjoy your cuck sight, mommy couldn't buy you a EOTech! The poorfag rage is STRONG.

>>32325827
That is a fancy SBR.

Once I have the funds I want to buy a T2 for my pinned 14.5" build.

>>32328264
You know you're fucking retarded right?

File: 1310408064982.jpg (10KB, 441x408px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 441x408px

>>32323187

File: 1210162346d.jpg (858KB, 2304x1296px) Image search: [Google]

858KB, 2304x1296px

>>32328378
Here is my set up, I am back from work now. Well been back for a few hours but w/e.