Is this a good deal?

if it's got a good stock and a good bore then it isn't awful considering the market for nuggets and the astronomical prices being asked for many of them.

>>32316416
No

eh,
Not good not bad.

File: hungarian_rebel_with_M44.jpg (127KB, 1280x1230px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1280x1230px

>>32316416
>$225 dollars for a carbine length russian m44 mosin with a matching bayonet and slight pitting in the barrel.
Considering the bayonet is permanently-attached to the M44 I should certainly hope it's matching. That's an OK price for 2016; go for it.

how much pitting are we talking

do you have any experience with mosins/milsurp rifles in general? could you tell the difference between slight pitting and heavy pitting?

>>32317015
no experience really, but it seems pretty slight.

>>32316416
I payed $400 for a Tula hex 91/30
Should I feel bad?

>>32318357
Not if you're happy.

>>32318400
It had a beautiful stock under all the cosmoline. The store I got it at didn't put any of their milsurp out on the shelves and it was caked more usual. Excited to fire over the beak if I get a change.

Found a Mosin that has an Arch Angel Stock. He's trying to sell it packaged deal with a savage Axis .308 for $450. I understand Mosin market went up but I'm not sure if this is a good deal just based on the stock. Should I pull the trigger on this deal /k/?

>>32318357
Maybe not if you are Australian

>>32316416
That's decent. A good condition Soviet M44 is about 250.

>>32318492
That's about $225 a rifle, not great especially for an arc angel mosin. That said the savage could be nice. If you got the cash lying around go for it.

>>32316416
>mosin
Only for collection. For shooting its shit.

>>32316416
>slight pitting in the barrel
that's a decent price but I certainly wouldn't pay a normal price for a rifle with a pitted barrel